• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

存在多形性时角膜内皮细胞密度估计值可预测性的进一步分析

Further Analysis of the Predictability of Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Estimates When Polymegethism Is Present.

作者信息

Doughty Michael J

机构信息

Department of Vision Sciences, Glasgow-Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland.

出版信息

Cornea. 2017 Aug;36(8):973-979. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001218.

DOI:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001218
PMID:28614153
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess variability in endothelial cell density (ECD) estimates when polymegethism (variance in cell areas) is present.

METHODS

Using noncontact specular microscope images of the corneal endothelium, 4 sets of 20 cases were selected, which included 200 cells and had coefficient of variation values of less than 30% (group 1), 31%-40% (group 2), 41%-50% (group 3), and over 50% (group 4). A stepwise analysis was undertaken, 20 cells at a time, of the ECD estimates when using different numbers of cells for the calculations.

RESULTS

The net differences in ECD estimates when comparing sets of 20 cells with 200 cells were 5.0% ± 3.9%, 8.1% ± 7.3%, 11.3% ± 9.4%, and 14.5% ± 12.4% for groups 1 to 4, respectively. For measures on 100 cells per image, the predicted variances in ECD values were 5.6%, 8.8%, 11.1%, and 13.7% for the 4 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher values of corneal endothelial polymegethism result in predictable increases in the variability (uncertainty) in ECD estimates, thus reducing the "accuracy" of ECD values. There is no obvious utility in assessing more than 100 cells in such endothelia.

摘要

目的

评估存在多形性(细胞面积方差)时内皮细胞密度(ECD)估计值的变异性。

方法

使用角膜内皮的非接触式镜面显微镜图像,选取4组,每组20例,共200个细胞,变异系数值分别小于30%(第1组)、31%-40%(第2组)、41%-50%(第3组)和超过50%(第4组)。在计算时,每次逐步分析使用不同数量细胞时的ECD估计值,每次分析20个细胞。

结果

第1至4组中,将20个细胞组与200个细胞组的ECD估计值进行比较时,净差异分别为5.0%±3.9%、8.1%±7.3%、11.3%±9.4%和14.5%±12.4%。对于每张图像100个细胞的测量,4组ECD值的预测方差分别为5.6%、8.8%、11.1%和13.7%。

结论

角膜内皮多形性值越高,ECD估计值的变异性(不确定性)会出现可预测的增加,从而降低ECD值的“准确性”。对于此类内皮细胞,评估超过100个细胞并无明显益处。

相似文献

1
Further Analysis of the Predictability of Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Estimates When Polymegethism Is Present.存在多形性时角膜内皮细胞密度估计值可预测性的进一步分析
Cornea. 2017 Aug;36(8):973-979. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001218.
2
On the regional variability of averaged cell area estimates for the human corneal endothelium in relation to the extent of polymegethism.关于人类角膜内皮平均细胞面积估计值的区域变异性与多形性程度的关系。
Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec;38(6):2537-2546. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0765-2. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
3
Assessment of the reliability of endothelial cell-density estimates in the presence of pseudoguttata.评估存在假性皱褶时内皮细胞密度估计值的可靠性。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;250(1):111-21. doi: 10.1007/s00417-011-1812-8. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
4
Assessment of the reliability of human corneal endothelial cell-density estimates using a noncontact specular microscope.使用非接触式角膜内皮显微镜评估人角膜内皮细胞密度估计值的可靠性。
Cornea. 2000 Mar;19(2):148-58. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200003000-00006.
5
An observational cross-sectional study on the corneal endothelium of medium-term rigid gas permeable contact lens wearers.一项关于中期硬性透气性角膜接触镜佩戴者角膜内皮的观察性横断面研究。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017 Apr;40(2):109-115. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2016.12.001. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
6
Reliability of a video-based noncontact specular microscope for assessing the corneal endothelium.
Cornea. 2007 Sep;26(8):924-9. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3180cfe4f1.
7
A comparison of two methods for estimating polymegethism in cell areas of the human corneal endothelium.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008 Jan;28(1):47-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2007.00533.x.
8
Two single descriptors of endothelial polymegethism and pleomorphism.内皮细胞多形性和多态性的两个单一描述符。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Aug;248(8):1159-66. doi: 10.1007/s00417-010-1337-6. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
9
Could the coefficient of variation (COV) of the corneal endothelium be overestimated when a centre-dot method is used?当使用中心点法时,角膜内皮细胞的变异系数(COV)会被高估吗?
Clin Exp Optom. 2008 Jan;91(1):103-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2007.00203.x.
10
Evaluation of possible error sources in corneal endothelial morphometry with a semiautomated noncontact specular microscope.使用半自动非接触式共焦显微镜评估角膜内皮形态计量学中可能的误差源。
Cornea. 2013 Sep;32(9):1196-203. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318295e72a.

引用本文的文献

1
Expression of Yes-associated protein in endothelial cells of human corneas before and after storage in organ culture.人角膜在器官培养保存前后内皮细胞中Yes相关蛋白的表达
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31073. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82269-y.
2
Comparison of Donor Cornea Endothelial Cell Density Determined by Eye Banks and by a Central Reading Center in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.在角膜保存时间研究中,眼库与中央阅片中心测定的供体角膜内皮细胞密度的比较。
Cornea. 2019 Apr;38(4):426-432. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001846.