• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准钻与超声种植体预备:锥形种植体植入 4 周后的临床研究。

Standard Drilling Versus Ultrasonic Implant Site Preparation: A Clinical Study at 4 Weeks After Insertion of Conical Implants.

机构信息

*Assistant Professor and Head, Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. †Assistant Professor, Department of Implant and Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy. ‡Director, DNA Medikalakademia Implantology Training and Educational Center, Istanbul, Turkey. §Faculty, Oral Surgery Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. ¶Professor, Periodontology Department, Dean, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

Implant Dent. 2017 Aug;26(4):547-552. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000615.

DOI:10.1097/ID.0000000000000615
PMID:28614158
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Clinically evaluate implants placed after ultrasonic implant site preparation (UISP) and standard drilling (SD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten patients received 21 implants placed using UISP (n = 11) or SD (n = 10). Bone quality was hand assessed and final insertion torque (IT), resonance frequency analysis (ISQ) at baseline and ISQ, and removal torque values (RTV) at 4 weeks were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

Mean IT values were 70.91 and 72.40 N/cm in UISP and SD groups, respectively, and were not statistically different. IT significantly correlated to bone quality. Mean ISQ values at baseline and 4 weeks were not significantly different and were 74.72 and 74.73 for UISP and 76.70 and 73.20 for SD, respectively. Mean ISQ at baseline significantly correlated to IT values and bone quality in both groups. Mean RTV values in both UISP (51.32 N/cm) and SD (53.1 N/cm) were not significantly different but significantly correlated to IT values. All implants achieved osseointegration and were restored.

CONCLUSION

Implant placement after ultrasonic preparation can be considered a predictable technique leading to clinical and biological responses similar to SD 4 weeks after insertion.

摘要

目的

临床评估超声种植体预备(UISP)和标准钻孔(SD)后植入的种植体。

材料和方法

10 名患者共接受了 21 枚种植体的植入,其中 11 枚采用 UISP 植入(UISP 组),10 枚采用 SD 植入(SD 组)。手动评估骨质量,并记录和比较基线时的最终植入扭矩(IT)、共振频率分析(ISQ)和 4 周时的 ISQ 和去除扭矩值(RTV)。

结果

UISP 组和 SD 组的平均 IT 值分别为 70.91 和 72.40 N/cm,差异无统计学意义。IT 值与骨质量显著相关。UISP 组和 SD 组的基线和 4 周时的平均 ISQ 值差异无统计学意义,分别为 74.72 和 74.73,76.70 和 73.20。两组的基线平均 ISQ 值与 IT 值和骨质量显著相关。UISP(51.32 N/cm)和 SD(53.1 N/cm)的平均 RTV 值差异无统计学意义,但与 IT 值显著相关。所有植入物均实现了骨整合并得到了修复。

结论

超声预备后的种植体植入可以被认为是一种可预测的技术,在植入后 4 周,其临床和生物学反应与 SD 相似。

相似文献

1
Standard Drilling Versus Ultrasonic Implant Site Preparation: A Clinical Study at 4 Weeks After Insertion of Conical Implants.标准钻与超声种植体预备:锥形种植体植入 4 周后的临床研究。
Implant Dent. 2017 Aug;26(4):547-552. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000615.
2
Resonance Frequency Analysis of Thermal Acid-Etched, Hydrophilic Implants During First 3 Months of Healing and Osseointegration in an Early-Loading Protocol.早期加载方案中热酸蚀亲水性种植体愈合和骨整合前3个月的共振频率分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Jul-Aug;30(4):843-50. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3985.
3
Evaluation of local cancellous bone amelioration by poly-L-DL-lactide copolymers to improve primary stability of dental implants: a biomechanical study in sheep.聚-L-DL-丙交酯共聚物改善局部松质骨以提高牙种植体初期稳定性的评估:一项在绵羊身上的生物力学研究
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 May;26(5):572-80. doi: 10.1111/clr.12445. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
4
Implant primary stability determined by resonance frequency analysis: correlation with insertion torque, histologic bone volume, and torsional stability at 6 weeks.种植体初始稳定性的共振频率分析:与植入扭矩、组织学骨量和 6 周时的扭转稳定性的相关性。
Implant Dent. 2012 Dec;21(6):474-80. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31826918f1.
5
Insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis of dental implant systems in an animal model with loaded implants.在植入负载的动物模型中对牙科种植体系统进行植入扭矩和共振频率分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 Sep-Oct;21(5):726-32.
6
Early loading of splinted implants supporting a two-unit fixed partial denture in the posterior maxilla: 13-month results from a randomized controlled clinical trial of two different implant systems.在上颌后牙区支持双单位固定局部义齿的夹板式种植体早期加载:两种不同种植系统随机对照临床试验的13个月结果
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Aug;27(8):1017-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12667. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
7
Does Length, Diameter, or Bone Quality Affect Primary and Secondary Stability in Self-Tapping Dental Implants?长度、直径或骨质会影响自攻式牙种植体的初期稳定性和二期稳定性吗?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jul;74(7):1344-53. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
8
Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and insertional torque (IT) stability comparisons of implants placed using osteotomes versus drilling techniques: A preliminary case study.使用骨凿与钻孔技术植入种植体的共振频率分析(RFA)和植入扭矩(IT)稳定性比较:一项初步病例研究。
Quintessence Int. 2015 Oct;46(9):789-98. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a34453.
9
Relationship between the bone density estimated by cone-beam computed tomography and the primary stability of dental implants.锥形束计算机断层扫描估计的骨密度与牙种植体的初始稳定性之间的关系。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Jul;23(7):832-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02203.x. Epub 2011 May 5.
10
Undersized implant site preparation to enhance primary implant stability in poor bone density: a prospective clinical study.采用小型种植体植入位点预备技术提高骨密度不佳患者种植体初期稳定性的前瞻性临床研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Dec;69(12):e506-12. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.08.007.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of the Histological Characteristics of Bone Tissue Following Implant Drill Preparation Under Various Parameters: An In Vitro Study.不同参数下种植体钻孔制备后骨组织组织学特征的比较分析:一项体外研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 21;14(7):2161. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072161.
2
Evaluation of implant site preparation with piezosurgery versus conventional drills in terms of operation time, implant stability and bone density (randomized controlled clinical trial- split mouth design).超声骨刀与传统钻备洞在手术时间、种植体稳定性和骨密度方面的比较(随机对照临床试验- 分侧设计)。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 3;22(1):567. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02613-4.
3
Changes in implant stability using different site preparation techniques: Osseodensification drills versus piezoelectric surgery. A multi-center prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
不同种植体预备技术对种植体稳定性的影响:骨密实化钻与超声骨刀。一项多中心前瞻性随机对照临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Feb;25(1):133-140. doi: 10.1111/cid.13140. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
4
Stability and marginal bone loss in implants placed using piezoelectric osteotomy versus conventional drilling: systematic review and meta-analysis.采用压电骨切开术与传统钻孔术植入时的稳定性和边缘骨丢失:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021 Mar 1;26(2):e226-e237. doi: 10.4317/medoral.24146.
5
Primary Stability Optimization by Using Fixtures with Different Thread Depth According To Bone Density: A Clinical Prospective Study on Early Loaded Implants.根据骨密度使用不同螺纹深度的种植体优化初期稳定性:早期负载种植体的临床前瞻性研究
Materials (Basel). 2019 Jul 27;12(15):2398. doi: 10.3390/ma12152398.
6
Immediate Loading of Implant-Supported Single Crowns after Conventional and Ultrasonic Implant Site Preparation: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.种植体支持的单冠即刻负载:常规和超声种植体预备后的多中心随机对照临床试验。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Aug 14;2018:6817154. doi: 10.1155/2018/6817154. eCollection 2018.