Lu Y, Zhang M, Chen W H
National Institute of Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China.
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Apr 20;35(4):269-272. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9391.2017.04.007.
To investigate the application and effectiveness evaluation of the standard of GBZ/T 229.1-2010 in practice, and to explore the applicability, aiming to provide technical evidence for the revision of GBZ/T 229.1-2010. There were 2 questionnaire surveys carried out in the study, including general survey and specific survey. Databases were established and data were input with Excel 2010 and Epidata version 3.1 software. SPSS version 19.0 software was used for data cleaning and statistical analysis. The general survey received 100 questionnaires, with 43 from facilities and 57 from professional expertise. There were 59 questionnaires from occupational health technical service organizations held by government, and 11 from colleges and universities. The leading three jobs using GBZ/T 229.1-2010 were the occupational hazards evaluation for constructive project (69.0%) , lecturing/training (55.0%) , occupational hazards monitoring (50.0%) , respectively. The high frequency used contents of GBZ/T 229.1-2010 were the fourth part "classification" (67.0%) , the fifth part "the principles of classification management" (59.0%) , annex A "the correct use instructions" (52.0%) , respectively. In the results of feasibility, scores of the fourth part "classification" , the fifth part "the principles of classification management" , annex A "the correct use instructions" were 3.07, 3.03, 3.23, respectively. The parts needed to be modified as priories were the fourth part "classification" (22.0%) , the fifth part "the principles of classification management" (13.0%) , annex A "the correct use instructions" (12.0%) . The specific survey received 15 questionnaires, with 12 from the employers and 3 from occupational health technical service organizations. The awareness rate of GBZ/T 229.1-2010 among occupational health professionals was 83.3%. Classification results in the employers were used for guidance on improvement measures (66.7%) , health surveillance and monitoring (58.3%) , certification for occupational health and safety management system (33.3%) , occupational disease diagnosis (33.3%) , and personal protective equipment issued (33.3%) , etc. In the results of feasibility, scores of the content of free SiO(2), occupational exposure ratio, physical labor intensity level, classification of industrial dust, principles of classification management, annex A "the correct use instructions" were 5.00, 4.33, 5.00, 5.00, 3.67, 3.67, respectively. GBZ/T 229.1-2010 indicates that the standard is feasible and practical. But there are still some problems, such as classification of different kinds of industrial dusts at workplace, and the interaction of occupational exposure to industrial dusts and other hazards at workplace, etc.
为探讨GBZ/T 229.1—2010标准在实际工作中的应用及效果评价,探索其适用性,旨在为GBZ/T 229.1—2010标准的修订提供技术依据。本研究开展了2次问卷调查,包括普查和专项调查。建立数据库,采用Excel 2010和Epidata 3.1软件录入数据,运用SPSS 19.0软件进行数据清理和统计分析。普查共收到100份问卷,其中来自机构的有43份,来自专业人员的有57份。其中,来自政府举办的职业卫生技术服务机构的问卷有59份,来自高校的有11份。使用GBZ/T 229.1—2010标准最多的前三项工作分别是建设项目职业病危害评价(69.0%)、授课/培训(55.0%)、职业病危害监测(50.0%)。GBZ/T 229.1—2010标准使用频率较高的内容分别是第四部分“分类”(67.0%)、第五部分“分类管理原则”(59.0%)、附录A“正确使用说明”(52.0%)。在可行性结果方面,第四部分“分类”、第五部分“分类管理原则”、附录A“正确使用说明”的得分分别为3.07、3.03、3.23。需要优先修改的部分分别是第四部分“分类”(22.0%)、第五部分“分类管理原则”(13.0%)、附录A“正确使用说明 ”(12.0%)。专项调查共收到15份问卷,其中来自用人单位的有12份,来自职业卫生技术服务机构的有3份。职业卫生专业人员对GBZ/T 229.1—2010标准的知晓率为83.3%。用人单位的分类结果用于指导改进措施(66.7%))、健康监护与监测(58.3%)、职业健康安全管理体系认证(33.3%)、职业病诊断(33.3%)、发放个人防护用品(33.3%)等。在可行性结果方面,游离SiO₂含量、职业接触比值、体力劳动强度分级、生产性粉尘分类、分类管理原则、附录A“正确使用说明”等内容的得分分别为5.00、4.33、5.00、5.00、3.67、3.67。GBZ/T 229.1—2010标准表明该标准具有可行性和实用性。但仍存在一些问题,如工作场所不同种类生产性粉尘的分类,以及工作场所生产性粉尘职业接触与其他危害因素的相互作用等。