Lu Y, Zhang M, Zhou Z J
National Institute of Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China.
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Nov 20;35(11):837-839. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9391.2017.11.008.
To investigate the application and effectiveness evaluation of the standard of GBZ/T 229.2-2010 in practice, and to explore the applicability, aiming to provide technical evidence for the re-vision of GBZ/T 229.2-2010. There were 2 questionnaire surveys carried out in the study, including general survey and specific survey. Databases were established and data were input with Excel 2010 and Epi-data version 3.1 software. SPSS version 19.0 software was used for data cleaning and statistical analysis. In total, the general survey received 100 questionnaires, with 59 from occupational health technical ser-vice organizations held by government, and 11 from colleges and universities. The leading three jobs using GBZ/T 229.2-2010 were the occupational hazards evaluation for constructive project (65.0%), lecturing/train-ing (50.0%), occupational hazards monitoring (43.0%), respectively. In the results of feasibility, scores of the fourth part "classification" , the fifth part "the principles of classification management" , annex A "the correct use instructions" were 3.4, 3.3, 3.5 respectively. In total, the specific survey received 27 questionnaires, with 18 from the employers and 9 from occupational health technical service organizations. The awareness rate of GBZ/T 229.2-2010 among occupational health professionals was 72.2%. In the results of feasibility, scores of the level of chemical hazards, occupational exposure ratio, physical labor intensity level, classification of expo-sure to industrial toxicants, principles of classification management, annex A "the correct use instructions" were 3.2, 3.7, 4.3, 4.1, 3.2, 3.2, respectively The results indicates that each part of GBZ/T 229.2-2010 is feasible and practical. But there are still some problems, such as classification of different kinds of chemicals at workplace, and the interaction of occupational exposure to chemicals and other hazards at work-place, etc. We suggest that in the revision of GBZ/T 229.2-2010, the action level of hazards should be clear.
为探讨GBZ/T 229.2—2010标准在实际中的应用及效果评价,探索其适用性,旨在为GBZ/T 229.2—2010的修订提供技术依据。本研究开展了2次问卷调查,包括普查和专项调查。建立数据库,并使用Excel 2010和Epi-data 3.1软件录入数据。采用SPSS 19.0软件进行数据清理和统计分析。普查共收到100份问卷,其中来自政府举办的职业卫生技术服务机构的有59份,来自高校的有11份。使用GBZ/T 229.2—2010的前三位工作分别是建设项目职业病危害评价(65.0%)、授课/培训(50.0%)、职业病危害监测(43.0%)。在可行性结果中,第四部分“分类”、第五部分“分类管理原则”、附录A“正确使用说明”的得分分别为3.4、3.3、3.5。专项调查共收到27份问卷,其中来自用人单位的有18份,来自职业卫生技术服务机构的有9份。职业卫生专业人员对GBZ/T 229.2—2010的知晓率为72.2%。在可行性结果中,化学危害程度、职业接触率、体力劳动强度分级、工业毒物接触分类、分类管理原则、附录A“正确使用说明”的得分分别为3.2、3.7、4.3、4.1、3.2、3.2。结果表明,GBZ/T 229.2—2010各部分具有可行性和实用性。但仍存在一些问题,如工作场所不同化学品的分类,以及工作场所化学物职业接触与其他危害因素的相互作用等。建议在GBZ/T 229.2—2010修订中,明确危害的行动水平。