Greenwood James, Schwarz Carsten, Sommerwerck Urte, Nash Edward F, Tamm Michael, Cao Weihua, Mastoridis Paul, Debonnett Laurie, Hamed Kamal
Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Thomas Drive, Liverpool, UK.
Department of Pediatric Pneumology and Immunology, Cystic Fibrosis Centre Berlin, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2017 Jul;11(7):249-260. doi: 10.1177/1753465817710596.
This study assessed the ease of use of tobramycin inhalation powder (TIP) administered via T-326 inhaler versus tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS) and colistimethate sodium (COLI), both administered via nebulizers, for the treatment of chronic pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF).
A real-world, open-label, crossover, interventional phase IV study was conducted in CF patients aged ⩾6 years with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV) ⩾25% to ⩽90% predicted. Patients were assigned to one of the three treatment arms in Cycle 1; all patients received TIP in Cycle 2. Each cycle consisted of 28 days on and 28 days off the treatment.
A total of 60 patients [mean (standard deviation) age, 27.6 (8.4) years] were allocated to three treatment arms [TIS/TIP ( n = 14); COLI/TIP ( n = 28); TIP/TIP ( n = 18)] in Cycle 1. The mean total administration time, which included device setup and cleaning, in Cycle 1 versus Cycle 2 for TIS/TIP, COLI/TIP, and TIP/TIP arms were 37.0 versus 5.0 min, 16.4 versus 3.8 min, and 4.2 versus 3.4 min, respectively. The difference in mean total administration time was significantly shorter in Cycle 2 than in Cycle 1 for TIS/TIP ( p = 0.0112) and COLI/TIP ( p = 0.0016) arms. Overall, 12 patients were found to have contaminated devices across the two treatment cycles. In the TIP/TIP arm, no contamination of the T-326 inhaler was observed in either cycle. Treatment satisfaction, assessed by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication and ACCEPT® questionnaire, was better overall for TIP compared with TIS and COLI. There were no unexpected adverse events and most were mild or moderate in intensity.
The T-326 inhaler used to deliver TIP was easy to use, required shorter total administration time, and was much less frequently contaminated than the nebulizers. The safety findings observed for TIP were generally consistent with its established safety profile.
本研究评估了通过T - 326吸入器给药的妥布霉素吸入粉(TIP)与通过雾化器给药的妥布霉素吸入溶液(TIS)和黏菌素甲磺酸钠(COLI)相比,用于治疗囊性纤维化(CF)患者慢性肺部铜绿假单胞菌感染的易用性。
对年龄≥6岁、第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV)为预测值的25%至90%的CF患者进行了一项真实世界、开放标签、交叉、IV期干预性研究。患者在第1周期被分配到三个治疗组之一;所有患者在第2周期接受TIP治疗。每个周期包括28天治疗期和28天停药期。
第1周期共有60例患者[平均(标准差)年龄,27.6(8.4)岁]被分配到三个治疗组[TIS/TIP(n = 14);COLI/TIP(n = 28);TIP/TIP(n = 18)]。TIS/TIP组、COLI/TIP组和TIP/TIP组第1周期与第2周期的平均总给药时间(包括装置设置和清洁)分别为37.0分钟对5.0分钟、16.4分钟对3.8分钟和4.2分钟对3.4分钟。TIS/TIP组(p = 0.0112)和COLI/TIP组(p = 0.0016)第2周期的平均总给药时间差异明显短于第1周期。总体而言,在两个治疗周期中发现12例患者的装置受到污染。在TIP/TIP组中,两个周期均未观察到T - 326吸入器受到污染。通过药物治疗满意度问卷和ACCEPT®问卷评估,TIP的总体治疗满意度优于TIS和COLI。未出现意外不良事件,大多数不良事件强度为轻度或中度。
用于递送TIP的T - 326吸入器易于使用,总给药时间较短,且受污染的频率远低于雾化器。观察到的TIP安全性结果与其既定的安全性概况总体一致。