Darekar Anuja, Lamontagne Anouk, Fung Joyce
School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Feil and Oberfeld Research Center, Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital of the Centre Intégré de Santé et Services Sociaux de Laval (CISSS-Laval); Research site of the Montreal Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation (CRIR), 3205, Place Alton Goldbloom, Laval, QC, H7V 1R2, Canada.
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Jun 15;14(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0265-7.
Locomotor strategies for obstacle circumvention require appropriate postural coordination that depends on sensorimotor integration within the central nervous system. It is not known how these strategies are affected by a stroke. The objective of this study was to contrast postural coordination strategies used for obstacle circumvention between post-stroke participants (n = 12) and healthy controls (n = 12).
Participants walked towards a target in a virtual environment (11 × 8 m room) with cylindrical obstacles that were stationary or approaching from head-on, or diagonally 30° left/right.
Two stepping strategies for obstacle circumvention were identified: 1) side step: increase in step width by the foot ipsilateral to the side of circumvention; 2) cross step: decrease in step width by the foot contralateral to the side of circumvention. The side step strategy was favoured by post-stroke individuals in circumventing stationary and head-on approaching obstacles. In circumventing diagonally approaching obstacles, healthy controls generally veered opposite to obstacle approach (>60% trials), whereas the majority of post-stroke participants (7/12) veered to the same side of obstacle approach (V). Post-stroke participants who veered to the opposite side (V, 5/12) were more independent and faster ambulators who favoured the side step strategy in circumventing obstacles approaching from the paretic side and cross step strategy for obstacles approaching from the non-paretic side. V participants generally favoured the side step strategy for both diagonal approaches. Segmental rotation amplitudes and latencies were largest in the V group, and significantly greater in post-stroke participants than controls for all obstacle conditions. All participants initiated circumvention with the feet followed by the pelvis and thorax, demonstrating a caudal-rostral sequence of reorientation.
Postural coordination strategies for obstacle circumvention were altered post stroke, depending on the residual or restored functional abilities. Segmental re-orientations are also affected by the motion and direction of obstacle.
规避障碍物的运动策略需要适当的姿势协调,这依赖于中枢神经系统内的感觉运动整合。目前尚不清楚这些策略如何受到中风的影响。本研究的目的是对比中风后参与者(n = 12)和健康对照组(n = 12)在规避障碍物时所使用的姿势协调策略。
参与者在虚拟环境(11×8米的房间)中朝着目标行走,房间内有圆柱形障碍物,这些障碍物静止不动、从正面或向左/右对角线30°方向靠近。
确定了两种规避障碍物的迈步策略:1)侧步:在规避侧同侧脚的步宽增加;2)交叉步:在规避侧对侧脚的步宽减小。中风后个体在规避静止和正面靠近的障碍物时更倾向于侧步策略。在规避对角线靠近的障碍物时,健康对照组通常朝着与障碍物靠近方向相反的方向转向(>60%的试验),而大多数中风后参与者(7/12)朝着障碍物靠近方向的同一侧转向(V)。转向相反方向(V,5/12)的中风后参与者是更独立且行走速度更快的个体,他们在规避患侧靠近的障碍物时倾向于侧步策略,而在规避非患侧靠近的障碍物时倾向于交叉步策略。V组参与者在两种对角线接近情况下通常都倾向于侧步策略。V组的节段旋转幅度和潜伏期最大,并且在所有障碍物条件下,中风后参与者的节段旋转幅度和潜伏期均显著大于对照组。所有参与者均以脚开始规避动作,随后是骨盆和胸部,呈现出从尾端到头部的重新定向顺序。
中风后规避障碍物的姿势协调策略发生了改变,这取决于残余或恢复的功能能力。节段的重新定向也受到障碍物的运动和方向的影响。