Suppr超能文献

地佐辛预防丙泊酚注射痛的效果:一项荟萃分析。

Effects of dezocine on prevention of propofol injection pain: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhou Chengmao, Yang Yuting, Zhu Yu, Ruan Lin

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Zhaoqing Medical College, Zhaoqing.

Department of Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Changde, Changde.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2017 Jun 1;10:1369-1375. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S128889. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of dezocine on the prevention of propofol injection pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of dezocine in preventing propofol injection pain, from inception to April 2016, in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI. Next, two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed quality in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Finally, RevMan 5.2 software was used to conduct a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs totaling 630 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis study showed: 1) compared with the control group (relative risk [RR] =0.32, 95% CI [0.26, 0.39], <0.00001), the dezocine group showed a decreasing incidence of propofol injection pain; 2) for severity of propofol injection pain, incidences of mild pain (RR =0.55, 95% CI [0.40, 0.75], =0.0001), moderate pain (RR =0.28, 95% CI [0.18, 0.43], <0.00001), and severe pain (RR =0.11, 95% CI [0.06, 0.23], <0.00001) were considerably lower in the dezocine group than in the control group; 3) when comparing the incidence of propofol injection pain in the dezocine group with that of the lidocaine group, no statistically significant differences were found (RR =0.86, 95% CI [0.66, 1.13], =0.29); and 4) subgroup analysis indicated a significant reduction in the incidence of propofol injection.

CONCLUSION

Dezocine can both prevent propofol injection pain and mitigate its severity, and its efficacy shows no significant difference from that of lidocaine.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估地佐辛对预防丙泊酚注射痛的效果。

材料与方法

我们在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和中国知网中检索了从创刊至2016年4月地佐辛预防丙泊酚注射痛的随机对照试验(RCT)。接下来,两名研究者根据纳入和排除标准独立筛选文献、提取数据并评估质量。最后,使用RevMan 5.2软件进行荟萃分析。

结果

本荟萃分析纳入了7项RCT,共630例患者。荟萃分析研究显示:1)与对照组相比(相对危险度[RR]=0.32,95%可信区间[CI][0.26, 0.39],P<0.00001),地佐辛组丙泊酚注射痛的发生率降低;2)对于丙泊酚注射痛的严重程度,地佐辛组轻度疼痛(RR=0.55,95%CI[0.40, 0.75],P=0.0001)、中度疼痛(RR=0.28,95%CI[0.18, 0.43],P<0.00001)和重度疼痛(RR=0.11,95%CI[0.06, 0.23],P<0.00001)的发生率均显著低于对照组;3)比较地佐辛组与利多卡因组丙泊酚注射痛的发生率,未发现统计学显著差异(RR=0.86,95%CI[0.66, 1.13],P=0.29);4)亚组分析表明丙泊酚注射痛的发生率显著降低。

结论

地佐辛既能预防丙泊酚注射痛,又能减轻其严重程度,且其疗效与利多卡因无显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验