• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

物种水平的植物功能性状在湿地指示状态类别间的变化。

Variation in species-level plant functional traits over wetland indicator status categories.

作者信息

McCoy-Sulentic Miles E, Kolb Thomas E, Merritt David M, Palmquist Emily C, Ralston Barbara E, Sarr Daniel A

机构信息

School of Forestry Northern Arizona University Fort Collins USA.

USDA Forest Service National Stream and Aquatic Ecology Center Fort Collins CO USA.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2017 Apr 17;7(11):3732-3744. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2975. eCollection 2017 Jun.

DOI:10.1002/ece3.2975
PMID:28616170
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5468150/
Abstract

Wetland indicator status (WIS) describes the habitat affinity of plant species and is used in wetland delineations and resource inventories. Understanding how species-level functional traits vary across WIS categories may improve designations, elucidate mechanisms of adaptation, and explain habitat optima and niche. We investigated differences in species-level traits of riparian flora across WIS categories, extending their application to indicate hydrologic habitat. We measured or compiled data on specific leaf area (SLA), stem specific gravity (SSG), seed mass, and mature height of 110 plant species that occur along the Colorado River in Grand Canyon, Arizona. Additionally, we measured leaf δC, δN, % carbon, % nitrogen, and C/N ratio of 56 species with C3 photosynthesis. We asked the following: (i) How do species-level traits vary over WIS categories? (ii) Does the pattern differ between herbaceous and woody species? (iii) How well do multivariate traits define WIS categories? (iv) Which traits are correlated? The largest trait differences among WIS categories for herbaceous species occurred for SSG, seed mass, % leaf carbon and height, and for woody species occurred for height, SSG, and δC. SSG increased and height decreased with habitat aridity for both woody and herbaceous species. The δC and hence water use efficiency of woody species increased with habitat aridity. Water use efficiency of herbaceous species increased with habitat aridity via greater occurrence of C4 grasses. Multivariate trait assemblages differed among WIS categories. Over all species, SLA was correlated with height, δC, % leaf N, and C/N; height was correlated with SSG and % leaf C; SSG was correlated with % leaf C. Adaptations of both herbaceous and woody riparian species to wet, frequently inundated habitats include low-density stem tissue. Adaptations to drier habitats in the riparian zone include short, high-density cavitation-resistant stem tissue, and high water use efficiency. The results enhance understanding about using traits to describe plant habitat in riparian systems.

摘要

湿地指示状态(WIS)描述了植物物种对栖息地的亲和力,用于湿地划定和资源清查。了解物种水平的功能性状如何在WIS类别之间变化,可能会改进湿地指定,阐明适应机制,并解释栖息地适宜性和生态位。我们研究了河岸植物群在WIS类别中的物种水平性状差异,将其应用扩展到指示水文栖息地。我们测量或收集了亚利桑那州大峡谷科罗拉多河沿岸110种植物的比叶面积(SLA)、茎比重(SSG)、种子质量和成熟高度的数据。此外,我们测量了56种具有C3光合作用的植物的叶片δC、δN、碳含量百分比、氮含量百分比和C/N比。我们提出了以下问题:(i)物种水平性状在WIS类别之间如何变化?(ii)草本植物和木本植物的模式是否不同?(iii)多变量性状对WIS类别的定义效果如何?(iv)哪些性状相关?草本植物在WIS类别之间最大的性状差异出现在SSG、种子质量、叶片碳含量百分比和高度方面,而木本植物的最大性状差异出现在高度、SSG和δC方面。对于木本植物和草本植物来说,SSG随着栖息地干旱程度的增加而增加,高度则随着栖息地干旱程度的增加而降低。木本植物的δC以及因此的水分利用效率随着栖息地干旱程度的增加而增加。草本植物的水分利用效率随着栖息地干旱程度的增加而增加,这是通过C4草本植物的更多出现实现的。多变量性状组合在WIS类别之间存在差异。在所有物种中,SLA与高度、δC、叶片氮含量百分比和C/N相关;高度与SSG和叶片碳含量百分比相关;SSG与叶片碳含量百分比相关。草本和木本河岸物种对湿润、经常被淹没的栖息地的适应包括低密度的茎组织。河岸带对较干燥栖息地的适应包括短而高密度的抗空化茎组织以及高水分利用效率。这些结果增强了对利用性状描述河岸系统中植物栖息地的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f961/5468150/ffa8b26bd54e/ECE3-7-3732-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f961/5468150/c3af5d66245a/ECE3-7-3732-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f961/5468150/cbb3185ae253/ECE3-7-3732-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f961/5468150/be7028c865f9/ECE3-7-3732-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f961/5468150/ffa8b26bd54e/ECE3-7-3732-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f961/5468150/c3af5d66245a/ECE3-7-3732-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f961/5468150/cbb3185ae253/ECE3-7-3732-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f961/5468150/be7028c865f9/ECE3-7-3732-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f961/5468150/ffa8b26bd54e/ECE3-7-3732-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Variation in species-level plant functional traits over wetland indicator status categories.物种水平的植物功能性状在湿地指示状态类别间的变化。
Ecol Evol. 2017 Apr 17;7(11):3732-3744. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2975. eCollection 2017 Jun.
2
Abundance-weighted plant functional trait variation differs between terrestrial and wetland habitats along wide climatic gradients.丰度加权的植物功能性状变化在沿宽气候梯度的陆地和湿地生境之间存在差异。
Sci China Life Sci. 2021 Apr;64(4):593-605. doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1766-1. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
3
Limiting resource and leaf functional traits jointly determine distribution patterns of leaf intrinsic water use efficiency along aridity gradients.有限资源和叶片功能性状共同决定了叶片内在水分利用效率沿干旱梯度的分布格局。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jul 29;13:909603. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.909603. eCollection 2022.
4
Intra- and interspecific trait variations reveal functional relationships between specific leaf area and soil niche within a subtropical forest.种内和种间性状变化揭示了亚热带森林中比叶面积和土壤生态位之间的功能关系。
Ann Bot. 2018 May 11;121(6):1173-1182. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx222.
5
Future changes in key plant traits across Central Europe vary with biogeographical status, woodiness, and habitat type.中欧主要植物性状的未来变化因生物地理状况、木质化程度和栖息地类型而异。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jan 10;907:167954. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167954. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
6
Functional coordination between leaf traits and biomass allocation and growth of four herbaceous species in a newly established reservoir riparian ecosystem in China.中国新建水库河岸生态系统中四种草本植物叶片性状、生物量分配与生长之间的功能协调性
Ecol Evol. 2018 Nov 8;8(23):11372-11384. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4494. eCollection 2018 Dec.
7
Contrasting effects of plant inter- and intraspecific variation on community trait responses to restoration of a sandy grassland ecosystem.植物种间和种内变异对沙地草原生态系统恢复的群落性状响应的对比效应
Ecol Evol. 2017 Jan 24;7(4):1125-1134. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2711. eCollection 2017 Feb.
8
Variation in bulk-leaf C discrimination, leaf traits and water-use efficiency-trait relationships along a continental-scale climate gradient in Australia.沿澳大利亚大陆气候梯度的叶片 bulk-leaf C 分辨力、叶片性状和水分利用效率-性状关系的变化。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Mar;24(3):1186-1200. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13911. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
9
Global patterns of intraspecific leaf trait responses to elevation.全球种内叶片特征对海拔变化的响应模式。
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Jul;25(7):2485-2498. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14646. Epub 2019 May 6.
10
Evidence of a universal scaling relationship for leaf CO2 drawdown along an aridity gradient.叶二氧化碳沿干旱梯度下降的普遍比例关系的证据。
New Phytol. 2011 Apr;190(1):169-180. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03579.x. Epub 2010 Dec 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Trait-based adaptability of to the effects of soil water and salinity in the Yellow River Delta.黄河三角洲基于性状的对土壤水分和盐分影响的适应性
Ecol Evol. 2021 Jul 28;11(16):11352-11361. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7925. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
Convergent Variations in the Leaf Traits of Desert Plants.沙漠植物叶片性状的趋同变异
Plants (Basel). 2020 Aug 4;9(8):990. doi: 10.3390/plants9080990.

本文引用的文献

1
Root tissue structure is linked to ecological strategies of grasses.根系组织结构与禾本科植物的生态策略相关。
New Phytol. 2000 Dec;148(3):459-471. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00775.x.
2
Trends in wood density and structure are linked to prevention of xylem implosion by negative pressure.木材密度和结构的变化趋势与通过负压防止木质部内爆有关。
Oecologia. 2001 Feb;126(4):457-461. doi: 10.1007/s004420100628. Epub 2001 Feb 1.
3
Leaf size, specific leaf area and microhabitat distribution of chaparral woody plants: contrasting patterns in species level and community level analyses.
丛林木本植物的叶片大小、比叶面积和微生境分布:物种水平和群落水平分析中的对比模式
Oecologia. 2002 Feb;130(3):449-457. doi: 10.1007/s004420100805. Epub 2002 Feb 1.
4
Correlations between carbon isotope ratio and microhabitat in desert plants.沙漠植物中碳同位素比率与微生境之间的相关性。
Oecologia. 1988 Sep;76(4):562-566. doi: 10.1007/BF00397870.
5
Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale.全球尺度下植被类型的最大扎根深度。
Oecologia. 1996 Dec;108(4):583-595. doi: 10.1007/BF00329030.
6
The Role of Riparian Corridors in Maintaining Regional Biodiversity.河岸走廊在维持区域生物多样性中的作用。
Ecol Appl. 1993 May;3(2):209-212. doi: 10.2307/1941822.
7
Herbaceous Angiosperms Are Not More Vulnerable to Drought-Induced Embolism Than Angiosperm Trees.草本被子植物并不比被子植物树木更容易受到干旱诱导栓塞的影响。
Plant Physiol. 2016 Oct;172(2):661-667. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00829. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
8
Reinforcing loose foundation stones in trait-based plant ecology.强化基于性状的植物生态学中的松散基石。
Oecologia. 2016 Apr;180(4):923-31. doi: 10.1007/s00442-016-3549-x. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
9
Drowned, buried and carried away: effects of plant traits on the distribution of native and alien species in riparian ecosystems.被淹没、掩埋和冲走:植物性状对河岸生态系统中本地和外来物种分布的影响。
New Phytol. 2014 Oct;204(1):19-36. doi: 10.1111/nph.12951. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
10
Environmental and physiological determinants of carbon isotope discrimination in terrestrial plants.陆地植物中碳同位素分馏的环境和生理决定因素。
New Phytol. 2013 Dec;200(4):950-65. doi: 10.1111/nph.12423. Epub 2013 Jul 31.