• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球尺度下植被类型的最大扎根深度。

Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale.

作者信息

Canadell J, Jackson R B, Ehleringer J B, Mooney H A, Sala O E, Schulze E-D

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, 94305, Stanford, CA, USA.

Department of Botany, University of Texas at Austin, 78713, TX, Austin, USA.

出版信息

Oecologia. 1996 Dec;108(4):583-595. doi: 10.1007/BF00329030.

DOI:10.1007/BF00329030
PMID:28307789
Abstract

The depth at which plants are able to grow roots has important implications for the whole ecosystem hydrological balance, as well as for carbon and nutrient cycling. Here we summarize what we know about the maximum rooting depth of species belonging to the major terrestrial biomes. We found 290 observations of maximum rooting depth in the literature which covered 253 woody and herbaceous species. Maximum rooting depth ranged from 0.3 m for some tundra species to 68 m for Boscia albitrunca in the central Kalahari; 194 species had roots at least 2 m deep, 50 species had roots at a depth of 5 m or more, and 22 species had roots as deep as 10 m or more. The average for the globe was 4.6±0.5 m. Maximum rooting depth by biome was 2.0±0.3 m for boreal forest. 2.1±0.2 m for cropland, 9.5±2.4 m for desert, 5.2±0.8 m for sclerophyllous shrubland and forest, 3.9±0.4 m for temperate coniferous forest, 2.9±0.2 m for temperate deciduous forest, 2.6±0.2 m for temperate grassland, 3.7±0.5 m for tropical deciduous forest, 7.3±2.8 m for tropical evergreen forest, 15.0±5.4 m for tropical grassland/savanna, and 0.5±0.1 m for tundra. Grouping all the species across biomes (except croplands) by three basic functional groups: trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants, the maximum rooting depth was 7.0±1.2 m for trees, 5.1±0.8 m for shrubs, and 2.6±0.1 m for herbaceous plants. These data show that deep root habits are quite common in woody and herbaceous species across most of the terrestrial biomes, far deeper than the traditional view has held up to now. This finding has important implications for a better understanding of ecosystem function and its application in developing ecosystem models.

摘要

植物能够扎根的深度对整个生态系统的水文平衡以及碳和养分循环都具有重要意义。在此,我们总结了关于主要陆地生物群落中物种最大扎根深度的已知情况。我们在文献中找到了290条关于最大扎根深度的观测数据,涵盖了253种木本和草本植物。最大扎根深度范围从某些苔原物种的0.3米到卡拉哈里中部的白枝树(Boscia albitrunca)的68米;194种植物的根系至少深达2米,50种植物的根系深度在5米或更深,22种植物的根系深度达10米或更深。全球的平均深度为4.6±0.5米。各生物群落的最大扎根深度分别为:北方森林2.0±0.3米,农田2.1±0.2米,沙漠9.5±2.4米,硬叶灌木林和森林5.2±0.8米,温带针叶林3.9±0.4米,温带落叶林2.9±0.2米,温带草原2.6±0.2米,热带落叶林3.7±0.5米,热带常绿林7.3±2.8米,热带草原/稀树草原15.0±5.4米,苔原0.5±0.1米。将所有生物群落(除农田外)的物种按树木、灌木和草本植物这三个基本功能组进行分类,树木的最大扎根深度为7.0±1.2米,灌木为5.1±0.8米,草本植物为2.6±0.1米。这些数据表明,在大多数陆地生物群落的木本和草本物种中,深根习性相当普遍,远比目前传统观点所认为的要深。这一发现对于更好地理解生态系统功能及其在生态系统模型开发中的应用具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale.全球尺度下植被类型的最大扎根深度。
Oecologia. 1996 Dec;108(4):583-595. doi: 10.1007/BF00329030.
2
A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes.陆地生物群落根系分布的全球分析。
Oecologia. 1996 Nov;108(3):389-411. doi: 10.1007/BF00333714.
3
Rooting strategies in a subtropical savanna: a landscape-scale three-dimensional assessment.亚热带稀树草原的根系策略:一项景观尺度的三维评估
Oecologia. 2018 Apr;186(4):1127-1135. doi: 10.1007/s00442-018-4083-9. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
4
Depth of the biologically active zone in upland habitats at the Hanford Site, Washington: Implications for remediation and ecological risk management.华盛顿州汉福德场地高地栖息地生物活性区的深度:对修复和生态风险管理的启示
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2015 Jan;11(1):150-60. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1581. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
5
Alternative biome states of African terrestrial vegetation and the potential drivers: A continental-scale study.非洲陆地植被的替代生物群落状态及其潜在驱动因素:一项大陆尺度的研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Dec 15;800:149489. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149489. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
6
Rooting depth as a key woody functional trait in savannas.扎根深度是稀树草原中一个关键的木本功能性状。
New Phytol. 2020 Sep;227(5):1350-1361. doi: 10.1111/nph.16613. Epub 2020 May 12.
7
Global climate and the distribution of plant biomes.全球气候与植物生物群落的分布。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Oct 29;359(1450):1465-76. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1525.
8
Tree water uptake patterns across the globe.全球树木的水分吸收模式。
New Phytol. 2024 Jun;242(5):1891-1910. doi: 10.1111/nph.19762. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
9
Rooting depth varies differentially in trees and grasses as a function of mean annual rainfall in an African savanna.在非洲稀树草原,树木和草本植物的根系深度随年平均降雨量的变化而有所不同。
Oecologia. 2018 Jan;186(1):269-280. doi: 10.1007/s00442-017-4011-4. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
10
Arctic rooting depth distribution influences modelled carbon emissions but cannot be inferred from aboveground vegetation type.北极地区的根系深度分布会影响碳排放量的模拟结果,但无法根据地上植被类型进行推断。
New Phytol. 2023 Oct;240(2):502-514. doi: 10.1111/nph.18998. Epub 2023 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Revealing European-wide ecosystem strategies to drought from space.揭示全欧洲范围内从太空应对干旱的生态系统策略。
Sci Adv. 2025 Aug;11(31):eadt9251. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adt9251. Epub 2025 Jul 30.
2
Fine root and soil carbon stocks are positively related in grasslands but not in forests.细根碳储量与土壤碳储量在草原中呈正相关,但在森林中并非如此。
Commun Earth Environ. 2025;6(1):497. doi: 10.1038/s43247-025-02486-9. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
3
Estimating Rooting Depth From Herbarium Specimens Might Be More Accurate Than Using Large Trait Databases.

本文引用的文献

1
Water relations and growth of shrubs before and after fire in a semi-arid woodland.半干旱林地火灾前后灌木的水分关系与生长
Oecologia. 1992 Jul;90(4):467-473. doi: 10.1007/BF01875439.
2
Hydraulic lift and water use by plants: implications for water balance, performance and plant-plant interactions.植物的水力提升与水分利用:对水分平衡、性能及植物间相互作用的影响
Oecologia. 1993 Oct;95(4):565-574. doi: 10.1007/BF00317442.
3
Hydraulic lift: water efflux from upper roots improves effectiveness of water uptake by deep roots.水力提升:上部根系排出的水分提高了深层根系吸收水分的效率。
根据植物标本估计根系深度可能比使用大型性状数据库更准确。
Ecol Evol. 2025 Jun 17;15(6):e71529. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71529. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
A continental scale analysis reveals widespread root bimodality.一项大陆尺度的分析揭示了根系双峰分布的广泛存在。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jun 17;16(1):5281. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60055-2.
5
Modeling Wildfire Effects on Ecosystem Services in two Disparate California Watersheds and Communities.模拟野火对加利福尼亚州两个不同流域和社区生态系统服务的影响。
Environ Manage. 2025 Jul;75(7):1680-1700. doi: 10.1007/s00267-025-02185-3. Epub 2025 May 23.
6
Diversity of Plant Communities Surrounding the Hot Springs on the Eastern Flank of the Sierra Madre Oriental, Northeastern Mexico.墨西哥东北部马德雷山脉东麓温泉周围植物群落的多样性
Biology (Basel). 2025 Apr 7;14(4):382. doi: 10.3390/biology14040382.
7
Deep soil contributions to global nitrogen budgets.深层土壤对全球氮收支的贡献。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jan 23;16(1):966. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-56132-1.
8
Plant functional type and peat properties determine elemental transfer in boreal mire vegetation.植物功能类型和泥炭特性决定了北方泥炭地植被中的元素转移。
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 9;10(20):e38925. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38925. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.
9
Recovery of Scots Pine Seedlings from Long-Term Zinc Toxicity.苏格兰松幼苗从长期锌毒性中的恢复
Plants (Basel). 2024 Aug 11;13(16):2227. doi: 10.3390/plants13162227.
10
Groundwater-dependent ecosystem map exposes global dryland protection needs.地下水依赖型生态系统图揭示了全球干旱地区的保护需求。
Nature. 2024 Aug;632(8023):101-107. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07702-8. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
Oecologia. 1989 Apr;79(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00378231.
4
Resource partitioning between shrubs and grasses in the Patagonian steppe.巴塔哥尼亚草原灌木与草本植物之间的资源分配
Oecologia. 1989 Dec;81(4):501-505. doi: 10.1007/BF00378959.
5
Comparative physiology of burned and unburned Rhus laurina after chaparral wildfire.丛林野火后燃烧与未燃烧的月桂叶漆树的比较生理学
Oecologia. 1986 Dec;71(1):63-68. doi: 10.1007/BF00377322.
6
Recovery patterns of three chaparral shrub species after wildfire.三种山地常绿阔叶灌丛林灌木物种在野火后的恢复模式。
Oecologia. 1989 Aug;80(3):309-320. doi: 10.1007/BF00379032.
7
Hydraulic lift: Substantial nocturnal water transport between soil layers by Artemisia tridentata roots.水力提升:三齿蒿根系在土壤层之间进行大量夜间水分传输。
Oecologia. 1987 Oct;73(4):486-489. doi: 10.1007/BF00379405.
8
Water use patterns of four co-occurring chaparral shrubs.四种共生的丛林灌木的用水模式。
Oecologia. 1986 Sep;70(2):172-177. doi: 10.1007/BF00379236.
9
Summer water relations of the desert phreatophyte Prosopis glandulosa in the Sonoran Desert of southern California.加利福尼亚南部索诺兰沙漠中沙漠深根性植物腺牧豆树的夏季水分关系
Oecologia. 1981 Aug;50(2):271-276. doi: 10.1007/BF00348050.
10
Further observations on the water relations ofProsopis tamarugo of the northern Atacama desert.关于阿塔卡马沙漠北部塔马鲁戈牧豆树水分关系的进一步观察
Oecologia. 1980 Jan;44(2):177-180. doi: 10.1007/BF00572676.