• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Technical success and short-term results of surgical treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an experience of three centers.胃肠道间质瘤手术治疗的技术成功率及短期疗效:三个中心的经验
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jun 2;2:56. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2017.05.04. eCollection 2017.
2
Comparison between submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric stromal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer.固有肌层起源的胃间质瘤黏膜下隧道内镜切除术与内镜全层切除术的比较
Surg Endosc. 2017 Aug;31(8):3376-3382. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5350-7. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
3
Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) compared to submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection (STER) for treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.内镜全层切除术(EFTR)与黏膜下隧道内镜切除术(STER)治疗胃胃肠道间质瘤的比较。
Endosc Int Open. 2023 Feb 23;11(2):E179-E186. doi: 10.1055/a-1972-3409. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
Endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer in North America: methods and feasibility data.北美源于固有肌层的胃胃肠间质瘤的内镜切除术:方法和可行性数据。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1787-1792. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5862-9. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
5
A comparison of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic full-thickness resection and laparoscopic-assisted surgery for small gastrointestinal stromal tumors.内镜全层切除术与腹腔镜辅助手术治疗小胃肠道间质瘤的疗效与安全性比较
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3357-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4612-0. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
6
Clinical feasibility and safety of third space robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors dissection : A new surgical technique for treating gastric GISTs.经第三空间机器人与内镜协同手术治疗胃胃肠间质瘤的临床可行性和安全性:一种治疗胃 GIST 的新手术技术。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec;33(12):4192-4200. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07223-w. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
7
Endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.胃胃肠道间质瘤的内镜切除
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Dec 19;2:115. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2017.12.03. eCollection 2017.
8
Laparoscopic resection of clinically suspected gastric stromal tumors.腹腔镜切除临床疑似胃间质瘤
Surg Innov. 2006 Dec;13(4):231-7. doi: 10.1177/1553350606295960.
9
Endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor using clip-and-cut endoscopic full-thickness resection: a single-center, retrospective cohort in Korea.使用夹切式内镜全层切除术对胃胃肠道间质瘤进行内镜切除:韩国一项单中心回顾性队列研究
Clin Endosc. 2024 May;57(3):350-363. doi: 10.5946/ce.2023.144. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
10
Long-term outcomes of treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor by laparoscopic surgery: review of the literature and our experience.腹腔镜手术治疗胃胃肠道间质瘤的长期疗效:文献综述及我们的经验
Hepatogastroenterology. 2013 Nov-Dec;60(128):2011-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic Resection Versus Laparoscopic Resection for Gastric Submucosal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Safety and Efficacy.胃黏膜下肿瘤的内镜切除术与腹腔镜切除术:安全性和有效性的系统评价与荟萃分析
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;18(1):e70104. doi: 10.1111/ases.70104.
2
Double-nylon purse-string suture in closing postoperative wounds following endoscopic resection of large (≥ 3 cm) gastric submucosal tumors.双尼龙荷包缝合术在经内镜切除大(≥ 3 cm)胃黏膜下肿瘤后的术后伤口闭合中的应用。
World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 7;30(9):1143-1153. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i9.1143.
3
Comparison of efficacy and safety between endoscopic and laparoscopic resections in the treatment of gastric stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜切除术与腹腔镜切除术治疗胃间质瘤的疗效及安全性比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Dec;13(6):2863-2873. doi: 10.21037/jgo-22-1121.
4
Comparative Study on the Clinical Effects of Different Surgical Methods in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.不同手术方法治疗胃肠道间质瘤的临床效果比较研究
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Jul 21;2022:1280756. doi: 10.1155/2022/1280756. eCollection 2022.
5
Comparison of Prognosis Between Microscopically Positive and Negative Surgical Margins for Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.原发性胃肠道间质瘤手术切缘镜下阳性与阴性的预后比较:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 19;12:679115. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.679115. eCollection 2022.
6
Comparison Among Endoscopic, Laparoscopic, and Open Resection for Relatively Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (<5 cm): A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.相对较小的胃胃肠道间质瘤(<5厘米)的内镜、腹腔镜和开放手术切除的比较:一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 29;11:672364. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.672364. eCollection 2021.
7
The therapeutic effect of the digestive endoscopy tunneling technique on upper gastrointestinal muscularis propria tumors.消化内镜隧道技术对上消化道固有肌层肿瘤的治疗效果
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Sep 15;13(9):10663-10669. eCollection 2021.
8
Comprehensive review into the challenges of gastrointestinal tumors in the Gulf and Levant countries.对海湾地区和黎凡特国家胃肠道肿瘤挑战的全面综述。
World J Clin Cases. 2020 Feb 6;8(3):487-503. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i3.487.
9
Endoscopic full-thickness resection for treating small tumors originating from the muscularis propria in the gastric fundus: An improvement in technique over 15 years.内镜全层切除术治疗胃底固有肌层小肿瘤:15年技术改进
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019 Nov 15;11(11):1054-1064. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i11.1054.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic wedge gastrectomy for large gastrointestinal stromal tumors.腹腔镜楔形胃切除术治疗大型胃肠道间质瘤的安全性和有效性。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr;43(4):796-800. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
2
Current Techniques for Treating Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract.治疗上消化道胃肠道间质瘤的当前技术
Clin Endosc. 2016 May;49(3):226-8. doi: 10.5946/ce.2016.061. Epub 2016 May 23.
3
Current management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Surgery, current biomarkers, mutations, and therapy.胃肠道间质瘤的当前管理:手术、当前生物标志物、突变及治疗
Surgery. 2015 Nov;158(5):1149-64. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.06.027. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
4
Endoscopic full-thickness resection in the colorectum with a novel over-the-scope device: first experience.使用新型套扎式内镜全层切除术治疗结直肠癌:初步经验
Endoscopy. 2015 Aug;47(8):719-25. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391781. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
5
Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.胃肠道间质瘤:欧洲肿瘤内科学会诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2014 Sep;25 Suppl 3:iii21-6. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu255.
6
Laparoscopic versus open gastric resection for larger than 5 cm primary gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): a size-matched comparison.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗直径大于5厘米的原发性胃胃肠道间质瘤(GIST):一项大小匹配的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Sep;28(9):2577-83. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3506-x. Epub 2014 May 23.
7
Over-the-scope clip-assisted method for resection of full-thickness submucosal lesions of the gastrointestinal tract.经内镜圈套夹辅助切除胃肠道全层黏膜下病变的方法
Endoscopy. 2014 Sep;46(9):758-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365513. Epub 2014 May 15.
8
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) related emergencies.胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)相关急症。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(4):269-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
9
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors.胃肠道间质瘤。
Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2013 Jun;42(2):399-415. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
10
Laparoscopic versus open resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach.腹腔镜与开腹胃肠间质瘤切除术比较。
Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1546-54. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2622-8. Epub 2012 Dec 12.

胃肠道间质瘤手术治疗的技术成功率及短期疗效:三个中心的经验

Technical success and short-term results of surgical treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an experience of three centers.

作者信息

Gluzman Mark Igorevich, Kashchenko Victor Anatolevich, Karachun Aleksei Mikhailovich, Orlova Rashida Vakhidovna, Nakatis Iakov Aleksandrovich, Pelipas Iurii Vasilevich, Vasiukova Evgenia Leonidovna, Rykov Ivan Vladimirovich, Petrova Veronika Vladimirovna, Nepomniashchaia Svetlana Leonidovna, Klimov Anton Sergeevich

机构信息

Federal State-Funded Budgetary Public Health Facility L.G. Sokolov' Hospital N 122 of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.

Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Saint-Petersburg State University", Medical Department, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.

出版信息

Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jun 2;2:56. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2017.05.04. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.21037/tgh.2017.05.04
PMID:28616611
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5460099/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) comprise about 80% of gastrointestinal sarcomas. In patients with localized disease, surgery is considered as "Gold Standard" treatment. Organ-sparing radical en-block resection is widely accepted practice. Since lymph node dissection is not routinely indicated, minimally invasive approach is of particular interest. The aim of this study is to investigate the short-term outcomes of different surgical treatment of GISTs.

METHODS

We analyzed data of 116 patients who received surgical treatment for localized forms of GIST. Tumors were located in the stomach in 87 (75%) cases, in the small intestine in 26 (22.4%) cases, and extragastrointestinal GISTs were found in 3 (2.6%) patients. Four different approaches were used-open surgery (OpS, n=48), laparoscopic surgery (LS, n=40), endoscopic procedures (EP, n=22) and hybrid rendezvous (HR, n=6). Patient demographics, clinical presentation of tumors, characteristics of operation procedures (duration, intraoperative blood loss, frequency of R0-resection and fragmentation of tumor), postoperative complications and length of hospital stay were examined in all these groups.

RESULTS

Radical treatment (R0-resection) was performed in all patients. There were no cases of tumor ruptures during surgical procedure. Mean size of GIST in OpS was 9.1±2.0 [2-35] cm; in LS: 4.9±0.8 (1.5-15) cm; in HR: 3.5±0.8 (2-4.5) cm and in EP: 2.3±0.3 (0.4-3.5) cm. Intraoperative blood loss in OpS was 369.7±209.5 [0-4,000] mL; LS: 63.9±16.0 [0-150] mL; in HR: 96.7±44.3 [50-200] mL; in EP: 33.3±11.0 [0-150] mL. Duration of operation in OpS was 160±20.4 [50-310] min; in LS: 104.7±12.7 [50-185]; in HR: 176.7±44.0 [110-260] min and in EP: 89.8±15.5 [25-190] min. Complication rate in OpS was 5 (10.4%); in LS: 3 (7.5%); in HR: 0% and in EP: 3 (13.6%). Length of hospital stay in OpS was 13.8±2.2 [7-52] days; in LS: 11, 4±2.2 [4-21] days; in HR: 11±3.2 [7-15] days and in EP: 11, 9±2.1 [5-22] days. There were no postoperative deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a diversity of surgical approaches for GISTs treatment. From our point of view, the main selection criteria for certain procedure are size, localization, growth type of the tumor and status of overlying mucosa. Nevertheless, due to relative rarity and heterogeneity of this pathology, individualization is necessary in each specific case. Laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery is proved to be safe and feasible for resection of the gastric GISTs, with a reasonable operation time, low blood loss, and an acceptable complication rate. Immediate results indicate that all interventions were performed radically without mortality or serious morbidity.

摘要

背景

胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)约占胃肠道肉瘤的80%。对于局限性疾病患者,手术被视为“金标准”治疗方法。保留器官的根治性整块切除是广泛接受的做法。由于通常不常规进行淋巴结清扫,微创方法备受关注。本研究的目的是调查GIST不同手术治疗的短期结果。

方法

我们分析了116例接受局限性GIST手术治疗患者的数据。肿瘤位于胃的有87例(75%),位于小肠的有26例(22.4%),3例(2.6%)患者为胃肠道外GIST。采用了四种不同方法——开放手术(OpS,n = 48)、腹腔镜手术(LS,n = 40)、内镜手术(EP,n = 22)和混合会师手术(HR,n = 6)。对所有这些组的患者人口统计学、肿瘤临床表现、手术操作特征(持续时间、术中失血、R0切除频率和肿瘤破碎情况)、术后并发症及住院时间进行了检查。

结果

所有患者均进行了根治性治疗(R0切除)。手术过程中无肿瘤破裂病例。OpS组GIST的平均大小为9.1±2.0 [2 - 35] cm;LS组:4.9±0.8(1.5 - 15)cm;HR组:3.5±0.8(2 - 4.5)cm;EP组:2.3±0.3(0.4 - 3.5)cm。OpS组术中失血量为369.7±209.5 [0 - 4,000] mL;LS组:63.9±16.0 [0 - 150] mL;HR组:96.7±44.3 [50 - 200] mL;EP组:33.3±11.0 [0 - 150] mL。OpS组手术持续时间为160±20.4 [50 - 310]分钟;LS组:104.7±12.7 [50 - 185]分钟;HR组:176.7±44.0 [110 - 260]分钟;EP组:89.8±15.5 [25 - 190]分钟。OpS组并发症发生率为5例(10.4%);LS组:3例(7.5%);HR组:0%;EP组:3例(13.6%)。OpS组住院时间为13.8±2.2 [7 - 52]天;LS组:11.4±2.2 [4 - 21]天;HR组:11±3.2 [7 - 15]天;EP组:11.9±2.1 [5 - 22]天。无术后死亡病例。

结论

GIST治疗有多种手术方法。在我们看来,特定手术的主要选择标准是肿瘤大小、位置、生长类型及覆盖黏膜的状态。然而,由于这种病理情况相对罕见且具有异质性,每个具体病例都需要个体化。腹腔镜和内镜手术被证明对胃GIST切除是安全可行的,手术时间合理,失血少,并发症发生率可接受。近期结果表明所有干预均为根治性,无死亡或严重并发症。