Estremera-Arévalo Fermín, Albéniz Eduardo, Rullán María, Areste Irene, Iglesias Rosa, Vila Juan José
Aparato Digestivo, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, España.
Aparato Digestivo, Complejo Hospitalario de navarra .
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2017 Aug;109(8):578-586. doi: 10.17235/reed.2017.4773/2016.
Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has been performed since 2008 on more than 5,000 patients. It has proven to be highly effective in the treatment of achalasia and has shown promising outcomes for other esophageal motility spastic disorders.
A literature review of the efficacy of POEM compared to the previous invasive treatments for different esophageal motility disorders was performed. The application in the pediatric and elderly populations and its role as a rescue therapy after other procedures are also outlined.
Short-term outcomes are similar to laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) and pneumatic endoscopic dilation (PD) (clinical success > 90%) for achalasia subtypes I and II. Mid-term outcomes are comparable to LHM and overcome the results obtained after PD (> 90% vs ~50%). With regard to type III achalasia, POEM efficacy is 98% compared to 80.8% for LHM and the PD success remains at 40%. With regard to spastic esophageal disorders (SED), POEM has an effectiveness of 88% and 70% for distal esophageal spasm (DES) and jackhammer esophagus (JE) respectively. A response of 95% in patients with sigmoid esophagus has been reported. POEM has been performed in pediatric and elderly populations and has obtained a higher efficacy than PD in pediatric series (100% vs 33%) without greater adverse events. Previous treatments do not seem to hinder POEM results with excellent response rates, including 97% in post LHM and 100% in a re-POEM series. Final considerations: POEM has shown excellent short and mid-term results for all subtypes of achalasia but long-term results are not yet available. The promising results in SED may make POEM the first-line treatment for SED. A high-safety profile and efficacy have been shown in elderly and pediatric populations. Previous treatments do not seem to diminish the success rate of POEM. Core tip: POEM has emerged as an efficient treatment option for all subtypes of achalasia and other scenarios (including previous treatments and elderly and pediatric populations). Short and mid-term results are comparable to LHM and are better than PD data. The clinical response rate of DES and JE may make POEM the first-line treatment for SED.
自2008年以来,经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)已应用于5000多名患者。事实证明,它在治疗贲门失弛缓症方面非常有效,并且在治疗其他食管动力性痉挛性疾病方面也显示出了良好的效果。
对POEM与以往针对不同食管动力性疾病的侵入性治疗方法的疗效进行了文献综述。还概述了其在儿科和老年人群中的应用以及作为其他手术术后挽救治疗的作用。
对于I型和II型贲门失弛缓症,短期疗效与腹腔镜Heller肌切开术(LHM)和气囊内镜扩张术(PD)相似(临床成功率>90%)。中期疗效与LHM相当,且优于PD术后的结果(>90%对~50%)。对于III型贲门失弛缓症,POEM的疗效为98%,而LHM为80.8%,PD的成功率仍为40%。对于痉挛性食管疾病(SED),POEM对远端食管痉挛(DES)和胡桃夹食管(JE)的有效率分别为88%和70%。据报道,乙状结肠食管患者的缓解率为95%。POEM已在儿科和老年人群中开展,在儿科系列研究中其疗效高于PD(100%对33%),且不良事件并未增加。既往治疗似乎并不影响POEM的效果,有效率很高,包括LHM术后患者的有效率为97%,再次行POEM治疗系列的有效率为100%。最终结论:POEM在所有贲门失弛缓症亚型中均显示出优异的短期和中期效果,但长期结果尚不可知。在SED方面的良好结果可能使POEM成为SED的一线治疗方法。在老年和儿科人群中已显示出高安全性和疗效。既往治疗似乎并不降低POEM的成功率。核心提示:POEM已成为所有贲门失弛缓症亚型以及其他情况(包括既往治疗、老年和儿科人群)的有效治疗选择。短期和中期结果与LHM相当,且优于PD的数据。DES和JE的临床缓解率可能使POEM成为SED的一线治疗方法。