Suppr超能文献

“医生与手枪”及医生言论的监管

"Docs vs. Glocks" and the Regulation of Physicians' Speech.

作者信息

Appelbaum Paul S

机构信息

Dr. Appelbaum, who is editor of this column, is the Elizabeth K. Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine and Law, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Jul 1;68(7):647-649. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.68701. Epub 2017 Jun 15.

Abstract

Physicians increasingly have recognized the importance of asking patients whether they own firearms and suggesting safe means of storage. Florida's legislature perceived these questions as threats to patients' rights to keep guns and passed a law restricting physicians from making such inquiries. When a number of physicians and their organizations challenged the law in 2011, a six-year odyssey through the courts ensued. In the end, the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the statute, recognizing that physicians' free speech rights extend to communications with patients, a decision that may influence other attempts to restrict clinicians' speech.

摘要

医生们越来越认识到询问患者是否拥有枪支并建议安全储存方式的重要性。佛罗里达州立法机构认为这些问题是对患者持有枪支权利的威胁,并通过了一项法律,限制医生进行此类询问。2011年,一些医生及其组织对该法律提出质疑,随后历经六年的法庭漫长历程。最终,美国第十一巡回上诉法院推翻了该法规,认定医生的言论自由权延伸至与患者的交流,这一裁决可能会影响其他限制临床医生言论的企图。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验