Moen Daniel S, Wiens John J
Am Nat. 2017 Jul;190(1):29-44. doi: 10.1086/692065. Epub 2017 May 11.
A major goal of ecology and evolutionary biology is to explain patterns of species richness among clades. Differences in rates of net diversification (speciation minus extinction over time) may often explain these patterns, but the factors that drive variation in diversification rates remain uncertain. Three important candidates are climatic niche position (e.g., whether clades are primarily temperate or tropical), rates of climatic niche change among species within clades, and microhabitat (e.g., aquatic, terrestrial, arboreal). The first two factors have been tested separately in several studies, but the relative importance of all three is largely unknown. Here we explore the correlates of diversification among families of frogs, which collectively represent ∼88% of amphibian species. We assemble and analyze data on phylogeny, climate, and microhabitat for thousands of species. We find that the best-fitting phylogenetic multiple regression model includes all three types of variables: microhabitat, rates of climatic niche change, and climatic niche position. This model explains 67% of the variation in diversification rates among frog families, with arboreal microhabitat explaining ∼31%, niche rates ∼25%, and climatic niche position ∼11%. Surprisingly, we show that microhabitat can have a much stronger influence on diversification than climatic niche position or rates of climatic niche change.
生态学和进化生物学的一个主要目标是解释各分支中物种丰富度的模式。净多样化率(即一段时间内物种形成减去灭绝的速率)的差异往往可以解释这些模式,但驱动多样化率变化的因素仍不明确。三个重要的候选因素是气候生态位位置(例如,各分支主要是温带还是热带)、分支内物种间气候生态位变化的速率以及微生境(例如,水生、陆生、树栖)。前两个因素已在多项研究中分别进行了测试,但这三个因素的相对重要性在很大程度上尚不清楚。在这里,我们探讨蛙类科之间多样化的相关因素,蛙类共同代表了约88%的两栖动物物种。我们收集并分析了数千个物种的系统发育、气候和微生境数据。我们发现,拟合效果最佳的系统发育多元回归模型包含所有三种类型的变量:微生境、气候生态位变化速率和气候生态位位置。该模型解释了蛙类科之间多样化率变化的67%,其中树栖微生境解释了约31%,生态位变化速率解释了约25%,气候生态位位置解释了约11%。令人惊讶的是,我们发现微生境对多样化的影响可能比气候生态位位置或气候生态位变化速率更强。