Suppr超能文献

咖啡因摄入对通过不同方法量化的无氧能力的影响。

Effect of caffeine ingestion on anaerobic capacity quantified by different methods.

作者信息

Arcoverde Lucyana, Silveira Rodrigo, Tomazini Fabiano, Sansonio André, Bertuzzi Romulo, Lima-Silva Adriano Eduardo, Andrade-Souza Victor Amorim

机构信息

Sport Science Research Group, Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, Academic Center of Vitoria, Federal University of Pernambuco, Vitória de Santo Antão, Pernambuco, Brazil.

Endurance Performance Research Group, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Jun 15;12(6):e0179457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179457. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

We investigated whether caffeine ingestion before submaximal exercise bouts would affect supramaximal oxygen demand and maximal accumulated oxygen deficit (MAOD), and if caffeine-induced improvement on the anaerobic capacity (AC) could be detected by different methods. Nine men took part in several submaximal and supramaximal exercise bouts one hour after ingesting caffeine (5 mg·kg-1) or placebo. The AC was estimated by MAOD, alternative MAOD, critical power, and gross efficiency methods. Caffeine had no effect on exercise endurance during the supramaximal bout (caffeine: 131.3 ± 21.9 and placebo: 130.8 ± 20.8 s, P = 0.80). Caffeine ingestion before submaximal trials did not affect supramaximal oxygen demand and MAOD compared to placebo (7.88 ± 1.56 L and 65.80 ± 16.06 kJ vs. 7.89 ± 1.30 L and 62.85 ± 13.67 kJ, P = 0.99). Additionally, MAOD was similar between caffeine and placebo when supramaximal oxygen demand was estimated without caffeine effects during submaximal bouts (67.02 ± 16.36 and 62.85 ± 13.67 kJ, P = 0.41) or when estimated by alternative MAOD (56.61 ± 8.49 and 56.87 ± 9.76 kJ, P = 0.91). The AC estimated by gross efficiency was also similar between caffeine and placebo (21.80 ± 3.09 and 20.94 ± 2.67 kJ, P = 0.15), but was lower in caffeine when estimated by critical power method (16.2 ± 2.6 vs. 19.3 ± 3.5 kJ, P = 0.03). In conclusion, caffeine ingestion before submaximal bouts did not affect supramaximal oxygen demand and consequently MAOD. Otherwise, caffeine seems to have no clear positive effect on AC.

摘要

我们研究了在次最大强度运动前摄入咖啡因是否会影响超最大摄氧量和最大累积氧亏(MAOD),以及是否可以通过不同方法检测到咖啡因对无氧能力(AC)的改善作用。九名男性在摄入咖啡因(5毫克·千克-1)或安慰剂一小时后,参加了几次次最大强度和超最大强度运动。通过MAOD、替代MAOD、临界功率和总效率方法来估算AC。咖啡因对超最大强度运动期间的运动耐力没有影响(咖啡因组:131.3±21.9秒,安慰剂组:130.8±20.8秒,P = 0.80)。与安慰剂相比,次最大强度试验前摄入咖啡因对超最大摄氧量和MAOD没有影响(7.88±1.56升和65.80±16.06千焦,对比7.89±1.30升和62.85±13.67千焦,P = 0.99)。此外,当在次最大强度运动期间估算超最大摄氧量时不考虑咖啡因的影响,或者通过替代MAOD估算时,咖啡因组和安慰剂组的MAOD相似(67.02±16.36和62.85±13.67千焦,P = 0.41)或(56.61±8.49和56.87±9.76千焦,P = 0.91)。通过总效率估算的AC在咖啡因组和安慰剂组之间也相似(21.80±3.09和20.94±2.67千焦,P = 0.15),但通过临界功率方法估算时,咖啡因组的AC较低(16.2±2.6对比19.3±3.5千焦,P = 0.03)。总之,次最大强度运动前摄入咖啡因不会影响超最大摄氧量,因此也不会影响MAOD。否则,咖啡因似乎对AC没有明显的积极作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c43/5472322/1d5e2cac9080/pone.0179457.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验