Zagatto A M, Bertuzzi R, Miyagi W E, Padulo J, Papoti M
Department of Physical Education, UNESP- Univ Estadual Paulista, Bauru, Brazil.
School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Int J Sports Med. 2016 Aug;37(9):700-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-104413. Epub 2016 May 13.
The main barrier to the wide use of maximal accumulated oxygen deficit (MAOD) is the considerable time required to apply several sub- and supra-maximal exercise sessions. The main question of this study was whether the determination of MAOD using a single supramaximal exercise session (MAODALT) is valid and reliable in running. We investigated the effects of the supramaximal exercise intensity (A) and the reliability of a single supramaximal exercise session (B) to assess MAOD in treadmill running. For this aim 29 subjects participated in A & B studies with single allocation "A" (n=15) and "B" (n=14). The conventional MAOD and 8 MAODALT were determined in exhaustive efforts varying between 100-150% at an intensity associated with maximal oxygen uptake (i+V˙O2MAX). In B study 2 supramaximal efforts were applied to analyze the test-retest reliability. Non-significant differences were found between MAOD and the 8 values of MAODALT. Despite the MAOD being statistically correlated with the MAODALT 100% i+V˙O2MAX (0.49
最大累积氧亏缺(MAOD)广泛应用的主要障碍在于,进行多次亚极量和超极量运动测试需要耗费大量时间。本研究的主要问题是,在跑步运动中,采用单次超极量运动测试来测定MAOD(MAODALT)是否有效且可靠。我们研究了超极量运动强度(A)以及单次超极量运动测试(B)对评估跑步机跑步中MAOD的可靠性的影响。为此,29名受试者参与了A和B两项研究,分别采用单次分组“A”(n = 15)和“B”(n = 14)。在与最大摄氧量(i + V˙O2MAX)相关的强度下,通过100 - 150%的力竭运动来测定传统MAOD和8次MAODALT。在B研究中,进行了2次超极量运动测试以分析重测信度。MAOD与8次MAODALT值之间未发现显著差异。尽管MAOD与100% i + V˙O2MAX时的MAODALT存在统计学相关性(0.49 < r > 0.59),但在115% i + V˙O2MAX(52.4±1.7 mL·kg(-1))时测定的MAODALT呈现出更高的相关值(0.65 < r > 0.77)和一致性。此外,在115% i + V˙O2MAX时的MAOD具有较高的重测信度。在115% i + V˙O2MAX时测定的MAODALT是评估跑步中MAOD的一种有效且可靠的方法。