Saouter Erwan, Aschberger Karin, Fantke Peter, Hauschild Michael Z, Bopp Stephanie K, Kienzler Aude, Paini Alicia, Pant Rana, Secchi Michela, Sala Serenella
Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate D-Sustainable Resources, European Commission, Ispra, Italy.
Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate F-Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, European Commission, Ispra, Italy.
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2017 Dec;36(12):3450-3462. doi: 10.1002/etc.3889. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
The scientific consensus model USEtox is recommended by the European Commission as the reference model to characterize life cycle chemical emissions in terms of their potential human toxicity and freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity impacts in the context of the International Reference Life Cycle Data System Handbook and the Environmental Footprint pilot phase looking at products (PEF) and organizations (OEF). Consequently, this model has been systematically used within the PEF/OEF pilot phase by 25 European Union industry sectors, which manufacture a wide variety of consumer products. This testing phase has raised some questions regarding the derivation of and the data used for the chemical-specific freshwater ecotoxicity effect factor in USEtox. For calculating the potential freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity impacts, USEtox bases the effect factor on the chronic hazard concentration (HC50) value for a chemical calculated as the arithmetic mean of all logarithmized geometric means of species-specific chronic median lethal (or effect) concentrations (L[E]C50). We investigated the dependency of the USEtox effect factor on the selection of ecotoxicological data source and toxicological endpoints, and we found that both influence the ecotoxicity ranking of chemicals and may hence influence the conclusions of a PEF/OEF study. We furthermore compared the average measure (HC50) with other types of ecotoxicity effect indicators, such as the lowest species EC50 or no-observable-effect concentration, frequently used in regulatory risk assessment, and demonstrated how they may also influence the ecotoxicity ranking of chemicals. We acknowledge that these indicators represent different aspects of a chemical's ecotoxicity potential and discuss their pros and cons for a comparative chemical assessment as performed in life cycle assessment and in particular within the PEF/OEF context. Environ Toxicol Chem 2017;36:3450-3462. © 2017 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC.
欧盟委员会推荐科学共识模型USEtox作为参考模型,以便在《国际参考生命周期数据系统手册》以及产品环境足迹(PEF)和组织环境足迹(OEF)试点阶段的背景下,从潜在的人类毒性和淡水水生生态毒性影响方面来表征生命周期化学排放。因此,在PEF/OEF试点阶段,欧盟25个制造各类消费品的行业部门系统地使用了该模型。这个测试阶段引发了一些关于USEtox中特定化学物质淡水生态毒性效应因子的推导及其所用数据的问题。为计算潜在的淡水水生生态毒性影响,USEtox将效应因子基于一种化学物质的慢性危害浓度(HC50)值,该值计算为物种特异性慢性半数致死(或效应)浓度(L[E]C50)的所有对数化几何均值的算术平均值。我们研究了USEtox效应因子对生态毒理学数据源和毒理学终点选择的依赖性,发现两者都会影响化学物质的生态毒性排名,进而可能影响PEF/OEF研究的结论。我们还将平均测量值(HC50)与监管风险评估中常用的其他类型的生态毒性效应指标进行了比较,如最低物种EC50或无可见效应浓度,并展示了它们如何也可能影响化学物质的生态毒性排名。我们认识到这些指标代表了化学物质生态毒性潜力的不同方面,并讨论了它们在生命周期评估中,特别是在PEF/OEF背景下进行比较化学评估时的优缺点。《环境毒理学与化学》2017年;36:3450 - 3462。© 2017作者。《环境毒理学与化学》由Wiley Periodicals, Inc.代表SETAC出版。