Faculty of Health Science, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Feb;27(3-4):582-592. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13925. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
To explore the illness experiences of older patients with late-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and to develop knowledge about how patients perceive their preferences to be taken into account in decision-making processes concerning mechanical ventilation and/or noninvasive ventilation.
Decisions about whether older patients with late-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease will benefit from noninvasive ventilation treatment or whether the time has come for palliative treatment are complicated, both medically and ethically. Knowledge regarding patients' values and preferences concerning ventilation support is crucial yet often lacking.
Qualitative design with a hermeneutic-phenomenological approach.
The data consist of qualitative in-depth interviews with 12 patients from Norway diagnosed with late-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The data were analysed within the three interpretative contexts described by Kvale and Brinkmann.
The participants described their lives as fragile and burdensome, frequently interrupted by unpredictable and frightening exacerbations. They lacked information about their diagnosis and prognosis and were often not included in decisions about noninvasive ventilation or mechanical ventilation.
Findings indicate that these patients are highly vulnerable and have complex needs in terms of nursing care and medical treatment. Moreover, they need access to proactive advanced care planning and an opportunity to discuss their wishes for treatment and care.
To provide competent care for these patients, healthcare personnel must be aware of how patients experience being seriously ill. Advanced care planning and shared decision-making should be initiated alongside the curative treatment.
探讨晚期慢性阻塞性肺疾病老年患者的患病体验,并了解患者对机械通气和/或无创通气决策过程中自身偏好被考虑的看法。
对于晚期慢性阻塞性肺疾病老年患者是否将从无创通气治疗中获益,以及是否到了姑息治疗的时间,这在医学和伦理上都是复杂的决定。关于患者对通气支持的价值观和偏好的知识至关重要,但往往却缺乏。
定性设计,采用解释学-现象学方法。
数据来自挪威 12 名被诊断为晚期慢性阻塞性肺疾病的患者的定性深入访谈。数据在 Kvale 和 Brinkmann 描述的三个解释性背景下进行分析。
参与者描述他们的生活脆弱而沉重,经常被不可预测和可怕的恶化所打断。他们缺乏有关诊断和预后的信息,并且经常不参与无创通气或机械通气的决策。
研究结果表明,这些患者非常脆弱,在护理和医疗方面有复杂的需求。此外,他们需要获得积极的高级护理计划,并有机会讨论他们对治疗和护理的愿望。
为了为这些患者提供有能力的护理,医疗保健人员必须了解患者的患病体验。应在进行治疗的同时开始进行高级护理计划和共同决策。