• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Discussing patient preferences for levels of life-sustaining treatment: development and pilot testing of a Danish POLST form.探讨患者对维持生命治疗水平的偏好:丹麦 POLST 表单的制定和初步测试。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Jan 11;21(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00892-2.
2
Decision-making conversations for life-sustaining treatment with seriously ill patients using a Danish version of the US POLST: a qualitative study of patient and physician experiences.使用丹麦版美国 POLST 对重病患者进行维持生命治疗的决策对话:一项对患者和医生体验的定性研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Mar;40(1):57-66. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2036481. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
3
Patient-physician conversations about life-sustaining treatment: Treatment preferences and participant assessments.医患关于维持生命治疗的对话:治疗偏好与参与者评估。
Palliat Support Care. 2023 Feb;21(1):20-26. doi: 10.1017/S1478951521001875.
4
To What Extent Do Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Reflect Patients' Preferences for Care at the End of Life?医生对维持生命治疗的医嘱(POLST)在多大程度上反映了患者在生命末期的护理偏好?
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Feb;22(2):334-339.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.016. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
5
Nursing Home Residents' Preferences on Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment.养老院居民对维持生命治疗医嘱的偏好
Gerontologist. 2016 Aug;56(4):714-22. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv019. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
6
Quality of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Forms Completed in Nursing Homes.疗养院填写的医生下达的维持生命治疗表格的质量。
J Palliat Med. 2017 May;20(5):538-541. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0280. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
7
Reasons for Discordance Between Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences and Medical Orders in Nursing Facilities Without POLST.无缓和医疗预嘱的护理机构中维持生命治疗偏好与医疗指令之间存在差异的原因。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023 Aug;40(8):837-843. doi: 10.1177/10499091221127996. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
8
Use of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment program for patients being discharged from the hospital to the nursing facility.针对从医院出院转至护理机构的患者使用医生下达的维持生命治疗计划。
J Palliat Med. 2014 Jan;17(1):43-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0097. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
9
Use of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment among California Nursing Home Residents.加利福尼亚州疗养院居民使用医生下达的维持生命治疗医嘱的情况。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Oct;31(10):1119-26. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3728-9. Epub 2016 May 17.
10
Do Life-sustaining Treatment Orders Match Patient and Surrogate Preferences? The Role of POLST.是否维持生命治疗令符合患者和代理人的偏好?POLST 的作用。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Feb;36(2):413-421. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06292-1. Epub 2020 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Shared decision-making with older people on TReatment Escalation planning for Acute deterioration in the emergency Medical Setting: a qualitative study of Clinicians' perspectives (STREAMS-C).在急诊医疗环境中治疗恶化的治疗升级计划方面与老年人共同决策:临床医生观点的定性研究(STREAMS-C)。
Age Ageing. 2024 Sep 1;53(9). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae204.
2
Responses to Open Peer Commentaries about "Timely dying in dementia: use patients' judgments and broaden the concept of suffering" and "Can an effective end-of-life intervention for advanced dementia be viewed as moral?".对关于“痴呆症患者的适时死亡:运用患者的判断并拓宽痛苦的概念”以及“针对晚期痴呆症的有效临终干预能否被视为道德行为?”的公开同行评论的回应
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2024 Mar 15;16(1):e12529. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12529. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
3
Perspectives of healthcare professionals and older patients on shared decision-making for treatment escalation planning in the acute hospital setting: a systematic review and qualitative thematic synthesis.医疗保健专业人员和老年患者对急性医院环境中治疗升级规划共同决策的看法:一项系统综述和定性主题综合分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Aug 10;62:102144. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102144. eCollection 2023 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Are We Getting What We Really Want? A Systematic Review of Concordance Between Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Documentation and Subsequent Care Delivered at End-of-Life.我们是否得到了我们真正想要的?对医生开具的维持生命治疗医嘱(POLST)文件与临终时提供的后续护理之间的一致性进行系统评价。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Sep;38(9):1142-1158. doi: 10.1177/1049909120976319. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
2
Indicators of Critical Illness and Predictors of Mortality in COVID-19 Patients.COVID-19患者的重症指标及死亡预测因素
Infect Drug Resist. 2020 Jun 26;13:1995-2000. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S261159. eCollection 2020.
3
The Importance of Addressing Advance Care Planning and Decisions About Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders During Novel Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19).在2019年新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)疫情期间,重视预先医疗计划及关于不进行心肺复苏医嘱决策的重要性
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1771-1772. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4894.
4
Shared decision making-Much studied, much still unknown.共同决策——研究众多,但仍有诸多未知。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Nov;102(11):1946-1948. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.09.006.
5
Changes in End-of-Life Practices in European Intensive Care Units From 1999 to 2016.1999年至2016年欧洲重症监护病房临终护理实践的变化
JAMA. 2019 Nov 5;322(17):1692-1704. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.14608.
6
Talking about end of life in general palliative care - what's going on? A qualitative study on end-of-life conversations in an acute care hospital in Denmark.在一般姑息治疗中谈论临终 - 怎么回事?丹麦一家急性护理医院关于临终谈话的定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Jul 25;18(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0448-z.
7
Improving Advanced Care Planning through Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Expansion across the United States: Lessons Learned from State-Based Developments.通过在美国扩大医生维持生命治疗医嘱(POLST)来改善临终关怀计划:基于各州发展的经验教训。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2020 Jan;37(1):19-26. doi: 10.1177/1049909119851511. Epub 2019 May 23.
8
Changes Over Time in the Oregon Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Registry: A Study of Two Decedent Cohorts.随着时间的推移,俄勒冈州维持生命治疗医嘱登记处的变化:两个死者队列的研究。
J Palliat Med. 2019 May;22(5):500-507. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0446. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
9
Patient and family engagement in the ICU: Report from the task force of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine.患者和家属在重症监护病房中的参与:来自世界危重病医学会联合会工作组的报告。
J Crit Care. 2018 Dec;48:251-256. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
10
Implementation and adoption of advanced care planning in the elderly trauma patient.老年创伤患者的先进医疗照护计划的实施与采用。
World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Sep 6;13:40. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0201-6. eCollection 2018.

探讨患者对维持生命治疗水平的偏好:丹麦 POLST 表单的制定和初步测试。

Discussing patient preferences for levels of life-sustaining treatment: development and pilot testing of a Danish POLST form.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Vejle and Middelfart Hospitals, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beriderbakken 4, DK-7100, Vejle, Denmark.

Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B.Winsløwsvej 19, DK-5000, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Jan 11;21(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00892-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12904-021-00892-2
PMID:35016665
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8749111/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medically frail and/or chronically ill patients are often admitted to Danish hospitals without documentation of patient preferences. This may lead to inappropriate care. Modelled on the American Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form, the purpose of the study was to develop and pilot test a Danish POLST form to ensure that patients' preferences for levels of life-sustaining treatment are known and documented.

METHODS

The study was a mixed methods study. In the initial phase, a Danish POLST form was developed on the basis of literature and recommendations from the National POLST organisation in the US. A pilot test of the Danish POLST form was conducted in hospital wards, general practitioners' clinics, and nursing homes. Patients were eligible for inclusion if death was assessed as likely within 12 months. The patient and his/her physician engaged in a conversation where patient values, beliefs, goals for care, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment alternatives were discussed. The POLST form was completed based on the patient's values and preferences. Family members and/or nursing staff could participate. Participants' assessments of the POLST form were evaluated using questionnaires, and in-depth interviews were conducted to explore experiences with the POLST form and the conversation.

RESULTS

In total, 25 patients participated, 45 questionnaires were completed and 14 interviews were conducted. Most participants found the POLST form readable and understandable, and 93% found the POLST form usable to a high or very high degree for discussing preferences regarding life-sustaining treatment. Three themes emerged from the interviews: (a) an understandable document is essential for the conversation, (b) handling and discussing wishes, and (c) significance for the future.

CONCLUSION

The Danish version of the POLST form is assessed by patients, families, physicians, and nurses as a useful model for obtaining and documenting Danish patients' preferences for life-sustaining treatment. However, this needs to be confirmed in a larger-scale study.

摘要

背景

体弱多病和/或患有慢性病的患者经常在没有记录患者偏好的情况下被送往丹麦的医院。这可能导致护理不当。该研究以美国的《医生指令维持生命治疗》(POLST)表格为蓝本,旨在开发和试点测试丹麦的 POLST 表格,以确保了解和记录患者对维持生命治疗水平的偏好。

方法

该研究是一项混合方法研究。在初始阶段,根据文献和美国国家 POLST 组织的建议,开发了丹麦的 POLST 表格。在医院病房、全科医生诊所和疗养院进行了丹麦 POLST 表格的试点测试。如果预计患者在 12 个月内死亡,则符合纳入标准。患者及其医生进行了一次对话,讨论了患者的价值观、信仰、护理目标、诊断、预后和治疗选择。根据患者的价值观和偏好填写 POLST 表格。家属和/或护理人员可以参与。使用问卷评估参与者对 POLST 表格的评估,并进行深入访谈,以探讨对 POLST 表格和对话的经验。

结果

共有 25 名患者参与,完成了 45 份问卷,并进行了 14 次访谈。大多数参与者认为 POLST 表格易于阅读和理解,93%的人认为 POLST 表格非常有用,可以用于讨论维持生命治疗的偏好。访谈中出现了三个主题:(a)易懂的文件对于对话至关重要,(b)处理和讨论意愿,以及(c)对未来的意义。

结论

患者、家属、医生和护士评估丹麦版的 POLST 表格是一种有用的模型,可以获取和记录丹麦患者对维持生命治疗的偏好。然而,这需要在更大规模的研究中得到证实。