Draper K, Ley C, Parsonnet J
1 Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, MC 5187, Stanford, CA 94305-5119, USA.
2 Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, MC 5187, Stanford, CA 94305-5119, USA.
Benef Microbes. 2017 Aug 24;8(4):507-519. doi: 10.3920/BM2016.0146. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
Probiotic use by patients and physicians has dramatically increased over the last decade, although definitive evidence is often lacking for their use. We examined probiotic-prescribing practices among health care providers (HCP) at a tertiary medical centre and compared these practices to clinical guidelines. HCP at the Stanford Medical Center received a survey on probiotic prescribing practices including choice of probiotic and primary indications. A broad overview of the literature was performed. Among 2,331 HCP surveyed, 632 responded. Of the 582 of these who routinely prescribed medications, 61% had recommended probiotic foods or supplements to their patients. Women and gastroenterologists were more likely to prescribe probiotics (odds ratio (OR): 1.5, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0-2.1; OR: 3.9, 95% CI: 1.5-10.1, respectively). Among probiotic prescribers, 50% prescribed inconsistently or upon patient request, and 40% left probiotic choice to the patient. Common indications for probiotics, particularly Lactobacillus GG, were prevention and treatment of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea (79 and 66%, respectively). Probiotics were often prescribed for 'general bowel health' or at patient request (27 and 39% of responders, respectively). Most respondents (63%) thought an electronic medical record (EMR) pop-up would change probiotic prescribing patterns. However, a review of published guidelines and large trials found inconsistencies in probiotic indications, dosages and strain selection. Probiotic prescribing is common but lacks consistency, with choice of probiotic frequently left to the patient, even for indications with some strain-specific evidence. Implementation of EMR pop-ups/pocket guides may increase consistency in probiotic prescribing, although the lack of clear and consistent guidelines must first be addressed with large, well-designed clinical trials.
在过去十年中,患者和医生对益生菌的使用显著增加,尽管其使用往往缺乏确凿证据。我们调查了一家三级医疗中心的医疗保健提供者(HCP)的益生菌处方做法,并将这些做法与临床指南进行了比较。斯坦福医疗中心的HCP收到了一份关于益生菌处方做法的调查问卷,包括益生菌的选择和主要适应症。对文献进行了广泛综述。在接受调查的2331名HCP中,632人做出了回应。在这582名经常开药的人中,61%曾向患者推荐过益生菌食品或补充剂。女性和胃肠病学家更有可能开益生菌处方(优势比(OR)分别为:1.5,95%置信区间(CI):1.0 - 2.1;OR:3.9,95%CI:1.5 - 10.1)。在开益生菌处方的人中,50%的人开处方不一致或根据患者要求开处方,40%的人让患者自行选择益生菌。益生菌的常见适应症,特别是鼠李糖乳杆菌GG,是预防和治疗抗生素相关性腹泻(分别为79%和66%)。益生菌经常被用于“一般肠道健康”或根据患者要求开具(分别占回应者的27%和39%)。大多数受访者(63%)认为电子病历(EMR)弹出提示会改变益生菌的处方模式。然而,对已发表指南和大型试验的回顾发现,益生菌的适应症、剂量和菌株选择存在不一致。益生菌处方很常见,但缺乏一致性,即使对于有一些菌株特异性证据的适应症,益生菌的选择也常常留给患者。实施EMR弹出提示/袖珍指南可能会提高益生菌处方的一致性,尽管首先必须通过大型、设计良好的临床试验来解决缺乏明确和一致指南的问题。