Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, UK.
Sleep Med Rev. 2018 Feb;37:114-129. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
This review aimed to assess the impact of behavioural therapy for insomnia administered alone (BT-I) or in combination with cognitive techniques (cognitive-behavioural therapy for insomnia, CBT-I) on depressive and fatigue symptoms using network meta-analysis. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched from 1986 to May 2015. Studies were included if they incorporated sleep restriction, a core technique of BT-I treatment, and an adult insomnia sample, a control group and a standardised measure of depressive and/or fatigue symptoms. Face-to-face, group, self-help and internet therapies were all considered. Forty-seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. Eleven classes of treatment or control conditions were identified in the network. Cohen's d at 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated to assess the effect sizes of each treatment class as compared with placebo. Results showed significant effects for individual face-to-face CBT-I on depressive (d = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.06-0.63) but not on fatigue symptoms, with high heterogeneity between studies. The source of heterogeneity was not identified even after including sex, age, comorbidity and risk of bias in sensitivity analyses. Findings highlight the need to reduce variability between study methodologies and suggest potential effects of individual face-to-face CBT-I on daytime symptoms.
本综述旨在通过网络荟萃分析评估单独进行的行为疗法治疗失眠(BT-I)或联合认知技术(认知行为疗法治疗失眠,CBT-I)对抑郁和疲劳症状的影响。检索了 1986 年至 2015 年 5 月的 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science。如果研究纳入了睡眠限制(BT-I 治疗的核心技术)和成人失眠样本、对照组和抑郁和/或疲劳症状的标准化测量,则将其纳入荟萃分析。面对面、小组、自助和互联网治疗都被考虑在内。共有 47 项研究纳入荟萃分析。在网络中确定了 11 类治疗或对照条件。计算 Cohen's d 以 95%置信区间(CI)评估与安慰剂相比,每种治疗类别的效果大小。结果表明,与安慰剂相比,个别面对面 CBT-I 对抑郁(d = 0.34,95%CI:0.06-0.63)有显著效果,但对疲劳症状没有显著效果,研究之间存在高度异质性。即使在敏感性分析中纳入了性别、年龄、合并症和偏倚风险,也无法确定异质性的来源。研究结果强调了需要减少研究方法之间的可变性,并表明个别面对面 CBT-I 可能对日间症状有影响。