Medical School for International Health Moshe Prywes Center for Medical Education, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel.
Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Office of International Medical Student Education, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Ann Glob Health. 2017 Mar-Apr;83(2):333-338. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2017.04.006.
Many of the 70,000 graduating US medical students [per year] have reported participating in a global health activity at some stage of medical school. This case study design provided a method for understanding the student's experience that included student's learning about culture, health disparities, exposure and reaction to a range of diseases actually encountered. The broad diversity of themes among students indicated that the GCE provided a flexible, personalized experience. We need to understand the student's experience in order to help design appropriate curricular experiences [and valid student assessment].
Our research aim was to analyze medical student reflection papers to understand how they viewed their Global Clinical Experience (GCE).
A qualitative case study design was used to analyze student reflection papers. All 28 students who participated in a GCE from 2008-2010 and in 2014-2015 and submitted a reflection paper on completion of the GCE were eligible to participate in the study. One student did not submit a reflection paper and was not included in the study.
All 27 papers were coded by paragraph for reflection and for themes. System of Care/Range of Care was mentioned most often, Aids to Adjustment Process was mentioned least. The theme, "Diseases," referred to any mention of a disease in the reflection papers, and 44 diseases were mentioned in the papers. The analysis for depth of reflection yielded the following data: Observation, 81/248 paragraphs; Observation and Interpretation, 130/248 paragraphs; and Observation, Interpretation, and Suggestions for change, 36/248 paragraphs; 9 reflection papers contained 27 separate accounts of a transformational experience.
This study provided a method for understanding the student's experience that included student's learning about culture, health disparities, and exposure and reaction to a range of diseases actually encountered. The broad diversity of themes among students indicated that the GCE provided a flexible, personalized experience. How we might design a curriculum to facilitate transformational learning experiences needs further research.
每年有 7 万名即将毕业的美国医学生[其中]有报告称,在医学院的某个阶段参与过一项全球卫生活动。本案例研究设计提供了一种理解学生体验的方法,包括学生对文化、卫生差异、接触和对实际遇到的一系列疾病的反应的学习。学生主题的广泛多样性表明,全球临床体验提供了灵活、个性化的体验。我们需要了解学生的体验,以便帮助设计适当的课程体验[和有效的学生评估]。
我们的研究目的是分析医学生的反思论文,以了解他们如何看待自己的全球临床体验(GCE)。
采用定性案例研究设计分析学生的反思论文。所有 2008-2010 年和 2014-2015 年参加 GCE 并在完成 GCE 后提交反思论文的 28 名学生都有资格参加这项研究。有一名学生未提交反思论文,因此未被纳入研究。
所有 27 篇论文都按段落进行了反思和主题编码。系统护理/护理范围被提及最多,适应辅助工具被提及最少。主题“疾病”是指在反思论文中提到的任何疾病,论文中提到了 44 种疾病。对反思深度的分析得出以下数据:观察,81/248 段;观察和解释,130/248 段;观察、解释和建议改变,36/248 段;9 篇反思论文包含了 27 个单独的转变经验。
本研究提供了一种理解学生体验的方法,包括学生对文化、卫生差异以及对实际遇到的一系列疾病的接触和反应的学习。学生主题的广泛多样性表明,全球临床体验提供了灵活、个性化的体验。我们如何设计一个课程来促进变革性的学习体验需要进一步研究。