Percopo Caroline M, Ma Michelle, Rosenberg Helene F
Inflammation Immunobiology Section, Laboratory of Allergic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Inflammation Immunobiology Section, Laboratory of Allergic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
J Leukoc Biol. 2017 Sep;102(3):905-913. doi: 10.1189/jlb.3AB0217-050RR. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
Administration of immunobiotic (Lp) directly to the respiratory mucosa promotes cross-protection against lethal pneumovirus infection via B-cell-independent mechanisms. In this study, we examined Lp-mediated cross protection in mice which cannot clear virus from lung tissue. Although Lp was initially protective, mice ultimately succumbed to a delayed lethal outcome associated with local production of the proinflammatory cytokines CCL1, -2, and -7, granulocyte recruitment, and ongoing virus replication. By contrast, CD8 mice, which are fully capable of clearing virus, are protected by Lp with no delayed lethal outcome, granulocyte recruitment to the airways, or induction of CCL7. Repeated administration of Lp to virus-infected mice had no impact on delayed mortality. Moreover, administration of Lp to the respiratory mucosa resulted in no induction of IFN-α or -β in or wild-type mice, and IFNR gene deletion had no impact on Lp-mediated protection. Overall, our findings indicate that although Lp administered to the respiratory tract has substantial impact on lethal virus-induced inflammation in situ, endogenous virus clearance mechanisms are needed to promote sustained protection. Our results suggest that a larger understanding of the mechanisms and mediators that limit acute virus-induced inflammation may yield new and useful therapeutic modalities.
将免疫益生菌(Lp)直接施用于呼吸道黏膜可通过不依赖B细胞的机制促进对致死性肺病毒感染的交叉保护。在本研究中,我们检测了Lp在无法从肺组织清除病毒的小鼠中介导的交叉保护作用。尽管Lp最初具有保护作用,但小鼠最终死于与促炎细胞因子CCL1、-2和-7的局部产生、粒细胞募集以及持续的病毒复制相关的延迟性致死结局。相比之下,完全能够清除病毒的CD8小鼠受到Lp的保护,没有延迟性致死结局、粒细胞向气道募集或CCL7的诱导。对病毒感染的小鼠重复施用Lp对延迟死亡率没有影响。此外,将Lp施用于呼吸道黏膜在基因敲除或野生型小鼠中均未诱导IFN-α或 -β的产生,并且IFNR基因缺失对Lp介导的保护没有影响。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,尽管将Lp施用于呼吸道对致死性病毒诱导的原位炎症有显著影响,但需要内源性病毒清除机制来促进持续保护。我们的结果表明,对限制急性病毒诱导炎症的机制和介质有更深入的了解可能会产生新的有用的治疗方法。