• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类的审美偏好一生中有多稳定?

How Stable Are Human Aesthetic Preferences Across the Lifespan?

作者信息

Pugach Cameron, Leder Helmut, Graham Daniel J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, John Jay College of Criminal JusticeNew York, NY, United States.

Faculty of Psychology, University of ViennaVienna, Austria.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 May 31;11:289. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00289. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00289
PMID:28620290
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5449452/
Abstract

How stable are human aesthetic preferences, and how does stability change over the lifespan? Here we investigate the stability of aesthetic taste in a cross-sectional study. We employed a simple rank-order preference task using paintings and photographs of faces and landscapes. In each of the four stimulus classes, we find that aesthetic stability generally follows an inverted U-shaped function, with the greatest degree of stability appearing in early to middle adulthood. We propose that one possible interpretation of this result is that it indicates a role for cognitive control (i.e., the ability to adapt cognition to current situations) in the construction of aesthetic taste, since cognitive control performance follows a generally similar trajectory across the lifespan. However, human aesthetic stability is on the whole rather low: even the most stable age groups show ranking changes of at least 1 rank per item over a 2-week span. We discuss possible implications for these findings in terms of existing theories of visual aesthetics and in terms of methodological considerations, though we acknowledge that other interpretations of our results are possible.

摘要

人类的审美偏好有多稳定,以及这种稳定性在整个生命周期中是如何变化的?在此,我们通过一项横断面研究来探究审美品味的稳定性。我们采用了一种简单的排序偏好任务,使用面部和风景的绘画及照片。在这四类刺激物中,我们发现审美稳定性通常呈现倒U形函数,在成年早期到中期出现最大程度的稳定性。我们提出,这一结果的一种可能解释是,它表明认知控制(即让认知适应当前情境的能力)在审美品味的构建中发挥了作用,因为认知控制能力在整个生命周期中遵循大致相似的轨迹。然而,人类的审美稳定性总体上相当低:即使是最稳定的年龄组在两周时间内每项的排名变化也至少有1位。我们从现有的视觉美学理论以及方法论考量方面讨论了这些发现可能带来的影响,不过我们承认对我们结果的其他解释也是有可能的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c2/5449452/225e8f34f731/fnhum-11-00289-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c2/5449452/3975182df3ef/fnhum-11-00289-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c2/5449452/626022027929/fnhum-11-00289-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c2/5449452/a68a98bfb8c4/fnhum-11-00289-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c2/5449452/225e8f34f731/fnhum-11-00289-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c2/5449452/3975182df3ef/fnhum-11-00289-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c2/5449452/626022027929/fnhum-11-00289-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c2/5449452/a68a98bfb8c4/fnhum-11-00289-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c2/5449452/225e8f34f731/fnhum-11-00289-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
How Stable Are Human Aesthetic Preferences Across the Lifespan?人类的审美偏好一生中有多稳定?
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 May 31;11:289. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00289. eCollection 2017.
2
Aesthetic Preference for Negatively-Valenced Artworks Remains Stable in Pathological Aging: A Comparison Between Cognitively Impaired Patients With Alzheimer's Disease and Healthy Controls.病理性衰老中对负性情绪艺术品的审美偏好保持稳定:阿尔茨海默病认知受损患者与健康对照的比较
Front Psychol. 2022 May 26;13:879833. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.879833. eCollection 2022.
3
Stronger shared taste for natural aesthetic domains than for artifacts of human culture.对自然审美领域的共同喜好强于对人类文化制品的喜好。
Cognition. 2018 Oct;179:121-131. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
4
Speed of person perception affects immediate and ongoing aesthetic evaluation.对人物的感知速度会影响即时和持续的审美评价。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jun;197:166-176. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
5
Aesthetic Preferences for Eastern and Western Traditional Visual Art: Identity Matters.东西方传统视觉艺术的审美偏好:身份认同至关重要。
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 20;7:1596. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01596. eCollection 2016.
6
Neuroaesthetics: The Cognitive Neuroscience of Aesthetic Experience.神经美学:审美体验的认知神经科学。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Mar;11(2):265-79. doi: 10.1177/1745691615621274.
7
Chromatic and spatial image statistics predict infants' visual preferences and adults' aesthetic preferences for art.颜色和空间图像统计可预测婴儿的视觉偏好以及成人对艺术的审美偏好。
J Vis. 2023 Aug 1;23(8):2. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.8.2.
8
All is beautiful? Generality vs. specificity of word usage in visual aesthetics.一切皆美?视觉美学中词汇使用的普遍性与特殊性
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Jan;139(1):187-201. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.10.004. Epub 2011 Nov 26.
9
Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments : The aesthetic episode - Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics.十年的审美鉴赏与审美判断模型:审美事件——实证美学的发展与挑战
Br J Psychol. 2014 Nov;105(4):443-64. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12084.
10
Perceptual and Social Attributes Underlining Age-Related Preferences for Faces.构成与年龄相关的面部偏好的感知和社会属性。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Aug 31;10:437. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00437. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Conserving the beauty of the world's reef fish assemblages.保护世界珊瑚礁鱼类群落的美丽。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jun 24;122(25):e2415931122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2415931122. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
2
Using machine learning to predict judgments on Western visual art along content-representational and formal-perceptual attributes.运用机器学习预测对西方视觉艺术的判断,依据是内容表现和形式感知属性。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0304285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304285. eCollection 2024.
3
Assessing the aesthetic attractivity of European butterflies: A web-based survey protocol.

本文引用的文献

1
Aesthetic Preferences for Eastern and Western Traditional Visual Art: Identity Matters.东西方传统视觉艺术的审美偏好:身份认同至关重要。
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 20;7:1596. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01596. eCollection 2016.
2
Private and Shared Taste in Art and Face Appreciation.艺术与面部审美中的个人品味与共同品味。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Apr 13;10:155. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00155. eCollection 2016.
3
The Development of Shared Liking of Representational but not Abstract Art in Primary School Children and Their Justifications for Liking.
评估欧洲蝴蝶的美学吸引力:一项基于网络的调查方案。
PLoS One. 2023 May 11;18(5):e0283360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283360. eCollection 2023.
4
Aesthetic Preference for Negatively-Valenced Artworks Remains Stable in Pathological Aging: A Comparison Between Cognitively Impaired Patients With Alzheimer's Disease and Healthy Controls.病理性衰老中对负性情绪艺术品的审美偏好保持稳定:阿尔茨海默病认知受损患者与健康对照的比较
Front Psychol. 2022 May 26;13:879833. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.879833. eCollection 2022.
5
The aesthetic value of reef fishes is globally mismatched to their conservation priorities.珊瑚礁鱼类的美学价值与其保护优先级在全球范围内不匹配。
PLoS Biol. 2022 Jun 7;20(6):e3001640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001640. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
Validation of an Aesthetic Assessment System for Commercial Tasks.用于商业任务的美学评估系统的验证
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Jan 9;24(1):103. doi: 10.3390/e24010103.
7
Hedonic Preferences to Audio and Visual Stimulation in Seniors with Cognitive Impairments.老年人认知障碍患者对视听刺激的享乐偏好。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;83(3):1353-1366. doi: 10.3233/JAD-210520.
8
The Aesthetic Self. The Importance of Aesthetic Taste in Music and Art for Our Perceived Identity.审美自我。音乐和艺术中的审美品味对我们感知到的身份认同的重要性。
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 9;11:577703. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577703. eCollection 2020.
9
A Theoretical Framework for How We Learn Aesthetic Values.关于我们如何学习审美价值的理论框架。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Sep 11;14:345. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00345. eCollection 2020.
10
Listening to birdsong reveals basic features of rate perception and aesthetic judgements.鸟鸣揭示了基本的感知速率和审美判断特征。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 25;287(1923):20193010. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.3010.
小学生对具象艺术而非抽象艺术的共同喜爱的发展及其喜爱的理由。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Feb 5;10:21. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00021. eCollection 2016.
4
Individual Aesthetic Preferences for Faces Are Shaped Mostly by Environments, Not Genes.个体对面部的审美偏好主要由环境而非基因塑造。
Curr Biol. 2015 Oct 19;25(20):2684-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.048. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
5
Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition.令人费解的 fMRI 研究中情绪、个性和社会认知的高度相关性。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 May;4(3):274-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01125.x.
6
The aesthetic aha: on the pleasure of having insights into Gestalt.美学顿悟:论洞察格式塔的愉悦
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Sep;144(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
7
Integrating holism and reductionism in the science of art perception.在艺术感知科学中整合整体论和还原论。
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr;36(2):145-6. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12001653.
8
The artful mind meets art history: toward a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation.巧思与艺术史相遇:为艺术欣赏科学构建心理历史学框架。
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Apr;36(2):123-37. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000489.
9
An Island of Stability: Art Images and Natural Scenes - but Not Natural Faces - Show Consistent Esthetic Response in Alzheimer's-Related Dementia.稳定之岛:阿尔茨海默病相关痴呆患者对艺术图像和自然场景而非自然面孔表现出一致的审美反应。
Front Psychol. 2013 Mar 7;4:107. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00107. eCollection 2013.
10
Putting reward in art: A tentative prediction error account of visual art.艺术中的奖赏:视觉艺术的一种试探性预测误差解释
Iperception. 2011;2(9):1035-62. doi: 10.1068/i0466aap. Epub 2011 Dec 15.