• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

艺术与面部审美中的个人品味与共同品味。

Private and Shared Taste in Art and Face Appreciation.

作者信息

Leder Helmut, Goller Juergen, Rigotti Tanya, Forster Michael

机构信息

Department of Basic Psychological Research and Research Methods, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Apr 13;10:155. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00155. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00155
PMID:27148012
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4829602/
Abstract

Whether beauty is in the eye of the beholder or shared among individuals is a longstanding question in empirical aesthetics. By decomposing the variance structure of data for facial attractiveness, it has been previously shown that beauty evaluations comprise a similar amount of private and shared taste (Hönekopp, 2006). Employing the same methods, we found that, for abstract artworks, components that vary between individuals and relate to personal taste are particularly strong. Moreover, we instructed half of our participants to disregard their own taste and judge stimuli according to the taste of others instead. Ninety-five women rated 100 abstract artworks for liking and 100 faces for attractiveness. We found that the private taste proportion was much higher in abstract artworks, accounting for 75% of taste compared to 40% in the face condition. Abstract artworks were also less affected than faces by the instruction to rate according to others' taste and therefore less susceptible to incorporation of external beauty standards. Together, our findings support the notion that art-and especially abstract art-crystallizes private taste.

摘要

美是存在于观赏者的眼中,还是在个体之间共享,这是实证美学中一个长期存在的问题。通过分解面部吸引力数据的方差结构,先前的研究表明,美的评价包含相似数量的个人品味和共享品味(霍内科普,2006年)。采用相同的方法,我们发现,对于抽象艺术作品,个体之间存在差异且与个人品味相关的成分尤为突出。此外,我们指示一半的参与者忽略自己的品味,而是根据他人的品味来评判刺激物。95名女性对100幅抽象艺术作品的喜爱程度和100张面孔的吸引力进行了评分。我们发现,抽象艺术作品中个人品味的比例要高得多,占品味的75%,而面部情况为40%。与面孔相比,抽象艺术作品受根据他人品味评分指令的影响也较小,因此不太容易纳入外部美的标准。总之,我们的研究结果支持了这样一种观点,即艺术——尤其是抽象艺术——体现了个人品味。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ebf/4829602/050ee3170a97/fnhum-10-00155-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ebf/4829602/050ee3170a97/fnhum-10-00155-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ebf/4829602/050ee3170a97/fnhum-10-00155-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Private and Shared Taste in Art and Face Appreciation.艺术与面部审美中的个人品味与共同品味。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Apr 13;10:155. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00155. eCollection 2016.
2
Once more: is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness.再一次:美是否只存在于旁观者的眼中?个人品味与共同品味对面部吸引力判断的相对贡献。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Apr;32(2):199-209. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.199.
3
The Development of Shared Liking of Representational but not Abstract Art in Primary School Children and Their Justifications for Liking.小学生对具象艺术而非抽象艺术的共同喜爱的发展及其喜爱的理由。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Feb 5;10:21. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00021. eCollection 2016.
4
Neural correlates of beauty retouching to enhance attractiveness of self-depictions in women.修饰自我形象以提升吸引力的神经关联:女性视角。
Soc Neurosci. 2021 Apr;16(2):121-133. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2021.1873178. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
5
Shared liking and association valence for representational art but not abstract art.对具象艺术而非抽象艺术的共同喜好和联想效价。
J Vis. 2015;15(5):11. doi: 10.1167/15.5.11.
6
Beauty in abstract paintings: perceptual contrast and statistical properties.抽象画中的美:感知对比和统计特性。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Mar 21;8:161. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00161. eCollection 2014.
7
The Influence of Art Expertise and Training on Emotion and Preference Ratings for Representational and Abstract Artworks.艺术专业知识与训练对具象和抽象艺术作品的情感及偏好评分的影响
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 5;10(8):e0134241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134241. eCollection 2015.
8
Fourier power spectrum characteristics of face photographs: attractiveness perception depends on low-level image properties.面部照片的傅里叶功率谱特征:吸引力感知取决于低层次图像属性。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 2;10(4):e0122801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122801. eCollection 2015.
9
Wonder, appreciation, and the value of art.惊叹、欣赏与艺术的价值。
Prog Brain Res. 2018;237:107-128. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 May 3.
10
Does beauty capture the eye, even if it's not (overtly) adaptive? A comparative eye-tracking study of spontaneous attention and visual preference with VAST abstract art.美是否能吸引眼球,即使它不是(明显)适应的?VAST 抽象艺术的自发性注意和视觉偏好的比较眼动研究。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Sep;209:103133. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103133. Epub 2020 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Aesthetic experiences across visual perception and mental imagery: Behaviorally indistinguishable, neurally distinct.跨视觉感知和心理意象的审美体验:行为上难以区分,神经上截然不同。
iScience. 2025 May 5;28(6):112588. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112588. eCollection 2025 Jun 20.
2
Individualized models of social judgments and context-dependent representations.社会判断的个性化模型与情境依赖表征
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 4;15(1):4208. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86056-1.
3
Appreciation of singing and speaking voices is highly idiosyncratic.对歌声和说话声的欣赏极具个性。

本文引用的文献

1
Shared liking and association valence for representational art but not abstract art.对具象艺术而非抽象艺术的共同喜好和联想效价。
J Vis. 2015;15(5):11. doi: 10.1167/15.5.11.
2
Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments : The aesthetic episode - Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics.十年的审美鉴赏与审美判断模型:审美事件——实证美学的发展与挑战
Br J Psychol. 2014 Nov;105(4):443-64. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12084.
3
The small step toward asymmetry: Aesthetic judgment of broken symmetries.迈向不对称的一小步:对打破对称性的审美判断。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Nov 6;11(11):241623. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241623. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Self-reference and emotional reaction drive aesthetic judgment.自我参照和情绪反应驱动审美判断。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 24;14(1):19699. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68331-9.
5
Consensus and contention in beauty judgment.审美判断中的共识与争议。
iScience. 2024 Jun 8;27(7):110213. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110213. eCollection 2024 Jul 19.
6
The psychometrics of rating facial attractiveness using different response scales.使用不同反应量表评定面部吸引力的心理测量学。
Perception. 2024 Sep;53(9):645-660. doi: 10.1177/03010066241256221. Epub 2024 May 23.
7
Experiencing beauty in everyday life.在日常生活中体验美。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 24;14(1):9463. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60091-w.
8
Integrative processing in artificial and biological vision predicts the perceived beauty of natural images.人工和生物视觉中的综合处理预测了自然图像的感知美。
Sci Adv. 2024 Mar;10(9):eadi9294. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adi9294. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
9
Genetic effects on variability in visual aesthetic evaluations are partially shared across visual domains.遗传因素对视觉审美评价变异性的影响在一定程度上是跨视觉领域共享的。
Commun Biol. 2024 Jan 6;7(1):55. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-05710-4.
10
About the Need for a More Adequate Way to Get an Understanding of the Experiencing of Aesthetic Items.关于需要一种更充分的方式来理解审美物品的体验。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Nov 6;13(11):907. doi: 10.3390/bs13110907.
Iperception. 2013 Jul 19;4(5):361-4. doi: 10.1068/i0588sas. eCollection 2013.
4
Visual aesthetics and human preference.视觉美学与人类偏好。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:77-107. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100504. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
5
Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.面部吸引力:基于进化的研究。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 12;366(1571):1638-59. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0404.
6
Beauty and the beholder: highly individual taste for abstract, but not real-world images.美在观者心中:对抽象图像有着高度个性化的品味,但对现实世界图像则不然。
J Vis. 2010 Feb 22;10(2):18.1-14. doi: 10.1167/10.2.18.
7
When attractiveness demands longer looks: the effects of situation and gender.当吸引力需要更长时间的注视时:情境与性别的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Sep;63(9):1858-71. doi: 10.1080/17470211003605142. Epub 2010 Apr 6.
8
Finding meaning in art: preferred levels of ambiguity in art appreciation.探寻艺术中的意义:艺术欣赏中对模糊性的偏好程度
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Nov;62(11):2105-12. doi: 10.1080/17470210903038974. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
9
The appraisal of facial beauty is rapid but not mandatory.对面部美的评估迅速但并非必需。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2008 Jun;8(2):132-42. doi: 10.3758/cabn.8.2.132.
10
Once more: is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness.再一次:美是否只存在于旁观者的眼中?个人品味与共同品味对面部吸引力判断的相对贡献。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Apr;32(2):199-209. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.199.