Daniels Lia M, Radil Amanda I, Goegan Lauren D
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Alberta, EdmontonAB, Canada.
Front Psychol. 2017 May 31;8:906. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00906. eCollection 2017.
Pre-service and practicing teachers feel responsible for a range of educational activities. Four domains of personal responsibility emerging in the literature are: student achievement, student motivation, relationships with students, and responsibility for ones own teaching. To date, most research has used variable-centered approaches to examining responsibilities even though the domains appear related. In two separate samples we used cluster analysis to explore how pre-service ( = 130) and practicing ( = 105) teachers combined personal responsibilities and their impact on three professional cognitions and their wellbeing. Both groups had low and high responsibility clusters but the third cluster differed: Pre-service teachers combined responsibilities for relationships and their own teaching in a cluster we refer to as teacher-based responsibility; whereas, practicing teachers combined achievement and motivation in a cluster we refer to as student-outcome focused responsibility. These combinations affected outcomes for pre-service but not practicing teachers. Pre-service teachers in the low responsibility cluster reported less engagement, less mastery approaches to instruction, and more performance goal structures than the other two clusters.
职前教师和在职教师对一系列教育活动负有责任。文献中出现的个人责任的四个领域是:学生成绩、学生动机、与学生的关系以及对自己教学的责任。迄今为止,尽管这些领域似乎相互关联,但大多数研究都采用以变量为中心的方法来研究责任。在两个独立的样本中,我们使用聚类分析来探讨职前教师(n = 130)和在职教师(n = 105)如何结合个人责任,以及它们对三种专业认知及其幸福感的影响。两组都有低责任聚类和高责任聚类,但第三个聚类不同:职前教师将对关系和自己教学的责任结合在一个我们称为基于教师的责任聚类中;而在职教师将成绩和动机结合在一个我们称为以学生成果为重点的责任聚类中。这些组合对职前教师的结果有影响,但对在职教师没有影响。低责任聚类中的职前教师比其他两个聚类报告的参与度更低、教学中的掌握方法更少,以及更多的成绩目标结构。