Department of Psychology, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, 1420 Austin Bluffs Pkwy, Colorado Springs, CO, 80918, USA.
Health Behavior Branch Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6710B Rockledge Drive MSC 7004, Bethesda, MD, 20817, USA.
Prev Sci. 2018 Feb;19(2):117-126. doi: 10.1007/s11121-017-0811-3.
The marijuana amotivational syndrome posits that cannabis use fosters apathy through the depletion of motivation-based constructs such as self-efficacy. The current study pursued a two-round design to rule out concomitant risk factors responsible for the connection from marijuana intake to lower general self-efficacy. College students (N = 505) completed measures of marijuana use, demographics (age, gender, and race), personality (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, openness, and neuroticism), other substance use (alcohol and tobacco), and general self-efficacy (initiative, effort, and persistence) in two assessments separated by a month. Hierarchical regression models found that marijuana use forecasted lower initiative and persistence, even after statistically ruling out 13 pertinent baseline covariates including demographics, personality traits, alcohol use, tobacco use, and self-efficacy subscales. A cross-lagged panel model involving initiative, effort, persistence, alcohol use, cigarette use, and marijuana use sought to unravel the temporal precedence of processes. Results showed that only marijuana (but not alcohol or tobacco) intake significantly and longitudinally prompted lower initiative and persistence. Furthermore, in the same model, the opposite temporal direction of events from lower general self-efficacy subscales to marijuana use was untenable. Findings provide partial support for the marijuana amotivational syndrome, underscore marijuana as a risk factor for decreased general self-efficacy, and offer implications and insights for marijuana prevention and future research.
大麻动机缺乏综合征认为,大麻通过消耗自我效能等基于动机的结构来助长冷漠。本研究采用两轮设计,以排除导致大麻摄入与较低一般自我效能感之间关联的同时存在的风险因素。大学生(N=505)在两次评估中完成了大麻使用、人口统计学(年龄、性别和种族)、人格(外向性、宜人性、尽责性、开放性和神经质)、其他物质使用(酒精和烟草)和一般自我效能感(主动性、努力和坚持)的测量,两次评估之间相隔一个月。层次回归模型发现,即使在统计上排除了包括人口统计学、人格特质、酒精使用、烟草使用和自我效能感分量表在内的 13 个相关基线协变量后,大麻使用仍预测了较低的主动性和坚持性。涉及主动性、努力、坚持、酒精使用、香烟使用和大麻使用的交叉滞后面板模型试图揭示过程的时间优先顺序。结果表明,只有大麻(而不是酒精或烟草)摄入显著且在纵向预测了较低的主动性和坚持性。此外,在同一模型中,从较低的一般自我效能感分量表到大麻使用的相反时间方向的事件是站不住脚的。研究结果为大麻动机缺乏综合征提供了部分支持,强调了大麻是降低一般自我效能感的一个风险因素,并为大麻预防和未来研究提供了启示和见解。