Mercille Julien
School of Geography, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jun 16;14(6):650. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14060650.
There is a growing literature on news media representations of alcohol-related issues. However, current scholarship has neglected critical political economic frameworks to interpret media coverage of alcohol. This paper presents such a framework that conceives of news organisations as corporations that share the values and interests of political and economic elites. The media are thus expected to present viewpoints that are more aligned with the alcohol industry than the scientific consensus on public health policy would warrant. The media are also expected, but to a lesser extent, to present a certain amount of support for public health perspectives because these are supported by a few socioeconomic elite groups (the medical professions, progressive politicians). The case of Ireland from 2012 to 2017 illustrates the framework empirically. Four main newspapers' coverage of the Public Health (Alcohol) Bill and related policies is examined. Results show that, overall, 44.0% of articles support public health measures and 56.0% are opposed or remain neutral. It is argued that the media are not strong proponents of public health for multiple reasons: there are more articles opposed to or neutral toward public health measures than supporting them; the number of supportive articles remains relatively small and there are still many pieces presenting drinks industry views; there are virtually no calls in the media for stronger measures; supportive coverage is partially explained by the pub owners lobby's support for minimum unit pricing; the media often downplay or ignore the negative consequences of alcohol, such as its role in accidents; many news articles normalise drinking and promote events sponsored by the industry; there is not a single Irish journalist covering alcohol issues systematically; and other policy issues that are prioritised by elites receive multiple times more media coverage than public health measures. In short, the media reflect the views of the political and economic establishment on public health measures: there is some support from the medical professions and progressive politicians, but overall, there is a clear reluctance to support strong public health strategies. One main recommendation for public health advocates to promote their perspectives is to diversify the mass media and make them less commercial in nature, as well as to engage with non-corporate, so-called progressive "alternative media" outlets.
关于新闻媒体对酒精相关问题的报道,相关文献日益增多。然而,当前的学术研究忽视了用以解读媒体对酒精报道的关键政治经济框架。本文提出了这样一个框架,将新闻机构视为与政治和经济精英有着共同价值观和利益的企业。因此,预计媒体呈现的观点会更符合酒精行业的利益,而非公共卫生政策方面的科学共识所应有的观点。同时,预计媒体也会在一定程度上支持公共卫生观点,不过程度较低,因为这些观点得到了一些社会经济精英群体(医学专业人士、进步政治家)的支持。2012年至2017年爱尔兰的案例从实证角度说明了这一框架。研究了四家主要报纸对《公共卫生(酒精)法案》及相关政策的报道。结果显示,总体而言,44.0%的文章支持公共卫生措施,56.0%的文章持反对态度或保持中立。有人认为,媒体并非公共卫生的坚定支持者,原因如下:反对或中立于公共卫生措施的文章多于支持它们的文章;支持性文章数量相对较少,且仍有许多文章呈现饮料行业的观点;媒体几乎没有呼吁采取更强有力的措施;支持性报道部分可归因于酒吧业主游说团体对最低单位定价的支持;媒体常常淡化或忽视酒精的负面后果,比如其在事故中的作用;许多新闻文章将饮酒常态化,并宣传由该行业赞助的活动;没有一名爱尔兰记者系统地报道酒精问题;精英阶层优先考虑的其他政策问题获得的媒体报道比公共卫生措施多得多。简而言之,媒体反映了政治和经济机构对公共卫生措施的看法:医学专业人士和进步政治家给予了一些支持,但总体而言,明显不愿支持强有力的公共卫生战略。公共卫生倡导者推广其观点的一项主要建议是使大众媒体多样化,减少其商业性质,并与非企业性质的、所谓的进步“另类媒体”渠道进行接触。