University of York, York, UK.
Addiction. 2021 Nov;116(11):3252-3260. doi: 10.1111/add.15404. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
This study explores the role of the public health advocacy coalition in alcohol policy development in Ireland. Compared with industry actors, much less is known about the membership, activities and influence of public health advocates in alcohol policymaking. To address this gap, this paper identifies several advocacy strategies, drawn from the advocacy coalition framework and other policy theories, and then analyses them in the context of recent Irish developments.
The study used theory-building process-tracing to construct a record of the public health advocacy coalition and its campaign to promote the Public Health (Alcohol) Act 2018 in Ireland. Specifically, we drew upon 131 primary documents produced by advocates, 464 newspaper articles and 18 semi-structured interviews with key advocates, public health experts and elected officials to undertake a thematic analysis.
Public health advocates in Ireland have developed sophisticated political strategies to foster major alcohol policy change. First, public health advocates led the formation of a broad-based advocacy coalition that helped members to effectively pool their limited resources as well as coordinate their strategy and messaging. Secondly, issue-framing and message discipline played a key role in the coalition's success. Advocates strategically focused upon the policy problem, specifically health harms, rather than the detailed content of the proposed measures. Finally, there is evidence of political learning, where advocates' prior experiences and knowledge of the political system in Ireland spurred innovations in campaigning. These strategies were interdependent and mutually reinforcing, and succeeded in building support for public health advocates' preferred policies among politicians and the general public.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: There are distinct capabilities that public health actors can mobilize in the policy process to win alcohol policy debates and capitalize on the constraints on industry influence on alcohol policymaking.
本研究探讨了公共卫生倡导联盟在爱尔兰酒精政策制定中的作用。与行业参与者相比,人们对公共卫生倡导者在酒精政策制定中的成员、活动和影响力知之甚少。为了弥补这一差距,本文从倡导联盟框架和其他政策理论中提取了几种倡导策略,并在最近爱尔兰的发展背景下对其进行了分析。
该研究使用理论构建过程追踪法来构建公共卫生倡导联盟及其在爱尔兰推动 2018 年《公共卫生(酒精)法案》的记录。具体来说,我们利用了倡导者制作的 131 份主要文件、464 篇报纸文章和 18 份与主要倡导者、公共卫生专家和民选官员的半结构化访谈记录进行主题分析。
爱尔兰的公共卫生倡导者制定了复杂的政治策略,以推动重大酒精政策变革。首先,公共卫生倡导者领导了一个基础广泛的倡导联盟的形成,这有助于成员有效地汇集他们有限的资源,并协调他们的策略和信息传递。其次,问题框架和信息纪律在联盟的成功中发挥了关键作用。倡导者战略性地关注政策问题,特别是健康危害,而不是所提议措施的详细内容。最后,有证据表明政治学习,即倡导者在爱尔兰的政治体系中的先前经验和知识促使了竞选活动的创新。这些策略是相互依存和相互加强的,成功地在政治家和公众中为公共卫生倡导者支持的政策赢得了支持。
讨论/结论:公共卫生行为者在政策过程中有独特的能力,可以调动来赢得酒精政策辩论,并利用对行业影响酒精政策制定的限制。