Wang Xinrui, Liu Ying, Zhang Yi, Ma Zhuo, An Zhuoling
Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Mar 18;19:635-645. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S496310. eCollection 2025.
The overuse and misuse of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in perioperative patients for stress ulcers prophylactic (SUP) is crucial. This study evaluated the impact of a Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (CFIR-ERIC)-guided intervention on the rational use of PPIs in a perioperative setting.
A single-center pre-post study was conducted at Beijing Chaoyang Hospital between April and November 2023. All hospitalized patients who used perioperative PPIs for SUP were included. Cases post-intervention were defined as the intervention group and were propensity score-matched with pre-intervention cases, which was defined as the control group. The intervention strategies were developed by following the updated CFIR framework and employing CFIR-ERIC strategies. Outcomes included rational use of PPIs, reasons for irrational use, total hospitalization and drug costs, PPI duration, costs, and average defined daily dose.
1122 cases were included in the intervention group and control group after propensity score matching, respectively. The intervention group showed significant improved rate of rational PPI use (81.7% vs 42.0%, p<0.001). Rates of non-indication use, inappropriate dosage and administration, drug selection, and administration route were significantly reduced (all p<0.05). Coagulation disorders or anticoagulant/antiplatelet treatment, severe trauma or multiple injuries, severe infection or sepsis were the three most prevalent severe risk factors among patients, with 46.7% and 29.5% of the two groups, respectively. We found no significant differences between the two groups in total hospitalization costs (¥55,672.84 vs ¥57,021.73, p=0.621) and total drug costs (¥3005.38 vs ¥3260.98, p=0.206). Additionally, PPI costs (¥7.44 vs ¥93.70, p<0.001) and defined daily dose (7.00 vs 8.00, p<0.001) were significantly lower in the intervention group. We also observed a downward trend in PPI duration (6.00 days vs 5.00 days, p=0.075).
The CFIR-ERIC-guided intervention effectively improved the rational use of PPIs for perioperative SUP, resulting in significant reductions in both the PPI duration and costs.
围手术期患者预防性使用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)时的过度使用和滥用情况至关重要。本研究评估了基于实施研究综合框架专家实施变革建议(CFIR-ERIC)的干预措施对围手术期合理使用PPI的影响。
2023年4月至11月在北京朝阳医院进行了一项单中心前后对照研究。纳入所有围手术期使用PPI进行应激性溃疡预防(SUP)的住院患者。干预后的病例定义为干预组,并与干预前的病例(定义为对照组)进行倾向得分匹配。干预策略是根据更新后的CFIR框架并采用CFIR-ERIC策略制定的。结果包括PPI的合理使用情况、不合理使用的原因、总住院费用和药物费用、PPI使用时长、费用以及平均限定日剂量。
倾向得分匹配后,干预组和对照组分别纳入1122例病例。干预组PPI合理使用率显著提高(81.7%对42.0%,p<0.001)。无指征使用、剂量和给药不当、药物选择及给药途径的发生率均显著降低(均p<0.05)。凝血障碍或抗凝/抗血小板治疗、严重创伤或多发伤、严重感染或脓毒症是患者中最常见的三种严重风险因素,两组中分别占比46.7%和29.5%。我们发现两组在总住院费用(55,672.84元对57,021.73元,p = 0.621)和总药物费用(3005.38元对3260.98元,p = 0.206)方面无显著差异。此外,干预组的PPI费用(7.44元对93.70元,p<0.001)和限定日剂量(7.00对8.00,p<0.001)显著更低。我们还观察到PPI使用时长呈下降趋势(6.00天对5.00天,p = 0.075)。
CFIR-ERIC指导的干预措施有效改善了围手术期SUP中PPI的合理使用,使PPI使用时长和费用均显著降低。