Suppr超能文献

水冲洗作为细胞减灭术联合腹腔热灌注化疗(CRS-HIPEC)的辅助手段。

Water lavage as an adjunct to cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC).

作者信息

Gabriel Emmanuel, Singla Smit, Kim Minhyung, Fisher Daniel, Powers Colin, Visioni Anthony, Attwood Kristopher, Skitzki Joseph

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Department of Immunology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2017 Sep;214(3):462-467. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.05.016. Epub 2017 Jun 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Water lavage (WL) during gastrointestinal cancer surgery has osmotically mediated lytic effects on tumor cells. We investigated the safety and efficacy of WL with CRS-HIPEC.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review, 1/2003-7/2014, of a single institution experience with CRS-HIPEC comparing patients who had WL (WL+) to those who did not (WL-).

RESULTS

Of 157 CRS-HIPECs, 16 (10.2%) were WL+. WL+ had more PCI scores >20 compared to WL- (56.3% vs 19.4%, respectively, p = 0.003); however, the completeness of cytoreduction (CC) was similar. There were no differences in hospital length of stay or post-operative complications. The average POD 1 sodium (Na) level was statistically lower in the WL+ group (133.6 ± 2.5 vs 135.5 ± 3.2 mEq/L, p = 0.023); however, the average Na at discharge for each group was 140 mEq/L. There were no differences in 3-year OS (3WL+:0.63 vs WL-:0.68, p = 0.97) or RFS (WL+:0.32 vs WL-:0.39, p = 0.47). A subset analysis for patients with PCI >20 showed no difference between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

WL offers a low cost, safe and theoretically efficacious method of tumor cell lysis for peritoneal malignancy.

摘要

背景

胃肠道癌手术期间的水洗(WL)对肿瘤细胞具有渗透介导的溶解作用。我们研究了WL联合细胞减灭术及腹腔热灌注化疗(CRS-HIPEC)的安全性和有效性。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,时间跨度为2003年1月至2014年7月,对单一机构中接受CRS-HIPEC的患者进行分析,比较接受WL的患者(WL+)和未接受WL的患者(WL-)。

结果

在157例CRS-HIPEC手术中,16例(10.2%)为WL+。与WL-相比,WL+的腹膜癌指数(PCI)评分>20的比例更高(分别为56.3%和19.4%,p = 0.003);然而,细胞减灭的完整性(CC)相似。住院时间或术后并发症方面无差异。WL+组术后第1天的平均钠(Na)水平在统计学上较低(133.6±2.5 vs 135.5±3.2 mEq/L,p = 0.023);然而,每组出院时的平均钠水平均为140 mEq/L。3年总生存期(OS)(WL+:0.63 vs WL-:0.68,p = 0.97)或无复发生存期(RFS)(WL+:0.32 vs WL-:0.39,p = 0.47)方面无差异。对PCI>20的患者进行的亚组分析显示两组之间无差异。

结论

WL为腹膜恶性肿瘤提供了一种低成本、安全且理论上有效的肿瘤细胞溶解方法。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验