Zhao Jingyi, Zhang Shufeng, Zhang Lei, Dong Xianhui, Li Jianhui, Wang Ying, Yao Yinhui
Department of Functional Center, Chengde Medical College, Chengde 067000, China.
Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, Chengde Medical College, Chengde 067000, China.
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;35(8):1166-1171. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
The aim of this study was to assess the value of serum procalcitonin (PCT) levels as a diagnostic marker for septic arthritis (SA) via meta-analysis.
We searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library, as well as the reference lists of relevant articles, for studies published up to May 21, 2015 and did not impose language restrictions. We selected original studies reporting the usefulness of PCT or C-reactive protein (CRP) as a diagnostic marker for SA. We summarized test performance characteristics with the use of forest plots, hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves, and bivariate random effects models. Prespecified subgroup analyses and meta-regression analyses were also performed.
This meta-analysis comprised 10 studies including 838 patients. The overall sensitivity of serum PCT levels for the diagnosis of SA in these studies was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.41-0.66), and the specificity of PCT was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.87-0.98). The positive likelihood ratio (LR) was 10.97 (95% CI, 4.65-25.89); the negative LR was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.38-0.62); and the area under ROC curve (AUROC) was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.78-0.85). Six studies also examined the usefulness of CRP levels as a marker for the diagnosis of SA. The sensitivity and specificity of CRP were 0.45 (95% CI, 0.35-0.55) and 0.079 (95% CI, 0.0.021-0.25), respectively, and the positive LR, negative LR and AUROC curve were 0.48 (95% CI, 0.39-0.61), 6.79 (95% CI, 2.04-23.81), and 0.30 (95% CI, 0.26-0.34), respectively.
PCT is more valuable than CRP for distinguishing SA from non-SA.
本研究旨在通过荟萃分析评估血清降钙素原(PCT)水平作为脓毒性关节炎(SA)诊断标志物的价值。
我们检索了截至2015年5月21日发表的PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆以及相关文章的参考文献列表,且未设语言限制。我们选择了报告PCT或C反应蛋白(CRP)作为SA诊断标志物有效性的原始研究。我们使用森林图、分层汇总受试者工作特征曲线和双变量随机效应模型总结了检验性能特征。还进行了预先设定的亚组分析和荟萃回归分析。
该荟萃分析包括10项研究,共838例患者。在这些研究中,血清PCT水平诊断SA的总体敏感性为0.54(95%可信区间,0.41 - 0.66),PCT的特异性为0.95(95%可信区间,0.87 - 0.98)。阳性似然比(LR)为10.97(95%可信区间,4.65 - 25.89);阴性似然比为0.49(95%可信区间,0.38 - 0.62);曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.82(95%可信区间,0.78 - 0.85)。六项研究还检验了CRP水平作为SA诊断标志物的有效性。CRP的敏感性和特异性分别为0.45(95%可信区间,0.35 - 0.55)和0.079(95%可信区间,0.021 - 0.25),阳性LR、阴性LR和AUROC曲线分别为0.48(95%可信区间,0.39 - 0.61)、6.79(95%可信区间,2.04 - 23.81)和0.30(95%可信区间,0.26 - 0.34)。
在区分SA与非SA方面,PCT比CRP更有价值。