Krumm Patrick, Zitzelsberger Tanja, Weinmann Melanie, Mangold Stefanie, Rath Dominik, Nikolaou Konstantin, Gawaz Meinrad, Kramer Ulrich, Klumpp Bernhard Daniel
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Germany.
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Germany.
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jul;92:11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.04.012. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
To compare left ventricular global function index (LVGFI) and quantitative late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in patients with unrecognized myocardial infarction (UMI), recognized myocardial infarction (RMI) and without myocardial infarction (MI).
Under waiver of the Institutional Review Board 235 patients (age 63.5±10.5years, 57 female) were retrospectively evaluated. All patients had undergone cardiac MRI at 1.5T for symptoms of CAD. 67 patients (29%) had suffered a known RMI before. Functional imaging and full-intensity late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging were evaluated for LVGFI and quantitative LGE mass.
Of 168 patients without history of RMI, 48 patients (29%) had UMI, 120 patients had no MI. LVGFI was lower in RMI patients (34±8% [range 16;52]), and UMI patients (35±8% [range 10;51]), compared to patients with no MI (38±7% [range 16;55]) respectively and similar between RMI and UMI patients. RMI patients had full-intensity LGE in 11±6% of left ventricular myocardial mass (LVMM). UMI patients had LGE in 9±5% of LVMM. RMI patients had significantly more LGE than UMI patients (p=0.0096).
LGE quantification is effective to assess infarction scar size in RMI and UMI patients. LVGFI provides information on cardiac function and morphology but does not allow for a reliable differentiation between patients with and without history of MI, due small differences and wide overlap of LVGFI values for all three patient groups. This may be a reason why LVGFI is not applied in clinical routine.
比较未识别心肌梗死(UMI)、已识别心肌梗死(RMI)和无心肌梗死(MI)患者的左心室整体功能指数(LVGFI)和定量延迟钆增强(LGE)情况。
在机构审查委员会豁免的情况下,对235例患者(年龄63.5±10.5岁,57例女性)进行回顾性评估。所有患者因CAD症状接受了1.5T心脏MRI检查。67例患者(29%)之前曾发生过已知的RMI。对功能成像和全强度延迟钆增强(LGE)成像评估LVGFI和定量LGE质量。
在168例无RMI病史的患者中,48例(29%)有UMI,120例无MI。与无MI患者(38±7%[范围16;55])相比,RMI患者(34±8%[范围16;52])和UMI患者(35±8%[范围10;51])的LVGFI较低,且RMI和UMI患者之间相似。RMI患者左心室心肌质量(LVMM)的11±6%有全强度LGE。UMI患者LVMM的9±5%有LGE。RMI患者的LGE明显多于UMI患者(p = 0.0096)。
LGE定量可有效评估RMI和UMI患者的梗死瘢痕大小。LVGFI提供有关心脏功能和形态的信息,但由于三组患者LVGFI值差异小且重叠大,无法可靠区分有无MI病史的患者。这可能是LVGFI未应用于临床常规的原因之一。