Themudo Raquel Espregueira, Johansson Lars, Ebeling-Barbier Charlotte, Lind Lars, Ahlstrom Håkan, Bjerner Tomas
Department of Radiology, Hospital Geral de Santo Antonio, Porto, Portugal.
Acta Radiol. 2009 Jul;50(6):652-7. doi: 10.1080/02841850902933081.
Traditionally, unrecognized myocardial infarction (UMI) is defined as the appearance, in a non-acute setting, of a new diagnostic Q wave. In the recent past, delayed-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DE-MRI) has provided a new imaging method for evaluating myocardial viability and to detect myocardial scars.
To investigate differences in tissue characteristics between UMI and recognized myocardial infarction (RMI) scars, by assessing the signal intensity (SI) detected by DE-MRI.
A randomized subgroup of 259 subjects from the Prospective Investigation of the Vasculature of Uppsala Seniors (PIVUS) study was submitted to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). DE-MRI-detected myocardial scars were divided in two groups, UMI and RMI, according to the hospital medical records. The scars detected by DE-MRI were analyzed by measuring SI ratio of scar tissue to normal myocardium.
The mean SI ratio in the UMI group (4.5+/-3.0, mean+/-SD) was lower than in the RMI group 8.9+/-5.1 (P-value = 0.001). This difference was still significant (P<0.0001) after adjustment for gender, body mass index, time of image acquisition after gadolinium administration, scar transmurality, or total myocardial infarction mass.
The difference in the SI ratio of the scars between the two groups most likely reflects a different contrast distribution volume of the tissues, which might indicate that UMI and RMI tissues diverge in tissue composition.
传统上,未识别的心肌梗死(UMI)被定义为在非急性情况下出现新的诊断性Q波。最近,延迟增强磁共振成像(DE-MRI)提供了一种新的成像方法,用于评估心肌活力和检测心肌瘢痕。
通过评估DE-MRI检测到的信号强度(SI),研究UMI和已识别心肌梗死(RMI)瘢痕之间组织特征的差异。
来自乌普萨拉老年人血管前瞻性研究(PIVUS)的259名受试者的随机亚组接受了心脏磁共振成像(MRI)检查。根据医院病历,将DE-MRI检测到的心肌瘢痕分为两组,UMI和RMI。通过测量瘢痕组织与正常心肌的SI比值,对DE-MRI检测到的瘢痕进行分析。
UMI组的平均SI比值(4.5±3.0,平均值±标准差)低于RMI组的8.9±5.1(P值=0.001)。在对性别、体重指数、钆注射后图像采集时间、瘢痕透壁性或总心肌梗死质量进行调整后,这种差异仍然显著(P<0.0001)。
两组瘢痕SI比值的差异很可能反映了组织中不同的对比剂分布容积,这可能表明UMI和RMI组织在组织组成上存在差异。