Li Haisheng, Tan Jianglin, Zhou Junyi, Yuan Zhiqiang, Zhang Jiaping, Peng Yizhi, Wu Jun, Luo Gaoxing
State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burn and Combined Injury, Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burn and Combined Injury, Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
J Surg Res. 2017 Jun 15;214:182-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.032. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
Electrical burns are important causes of trauma worldwide. This study aims to analyze the clinical characteristics, wound management, and outcome of electric burns.
This retrospective study was performed at the Institute of Burn Research of the Third Military Medical University during 2013-2015. Data including the demographics, injury patterns, wound treatment, and outcomes were collected and analyzed.
A total of 595 electrical burn patients (93.8% males) were included. The average age was 37.3 ± 14.6 y, and most patients (73.5%) were aged 19∼50 years. Most patients (67.2%) were injured in work-related circumstances. The mean total body surface area was 8.8 ± 11.8% and most wounds (63.5%) were full-thickness burns. Operation times of high-voltage burns and current burns were higher than those of low-voltage burns and arc burns, respectively. Of the 375 operated patients, 83.2% (n = 312) underwent skin autografting and 49.3% (n = 185) required skin flap coverage. Common types of skin flaps were adjacent (50.3%), random (42.2%), and pedicle (35.7%). Amputation was performed in 107 cases (18.0%) and concentrated on the hands (43.9%) and upper limbs (39.3%). The mean length of stay was 42.9 ± 46.3 d and only one death occurred (0.2%). Current burns and higher numbers of operations were major risk factors for amputation and length of stay, respectively.
Electrical burns mainly affected adult males with occupational exposures in China. Skin autografts and various skin flaps were commonly used for electric burn wound management. More standardized and effective strategies of treatment and prevention are still needed to decrease amputation rates.
电烧伤是全球创伤的重要原因。本研究旨在分析电烧伤的临床特征、创面处理及预后。
本回顾性研究于2013 - 2015年在第三军医大学烧伤研究所进行。收集并分析包括人口统计学资料、损伤类型、创面治疗及预后等数据。
共纳入595例电烧伤患者(男性占93.8%)。平均年龄为37.3±14.6岁,大多数患者(73.5%)年龄在19至50岁之间。大多数患者(67.2%)在工作相关情况下受伤。平均总体表面积为8.8±11.8%,大多数创面(63.5%)为全层烧伤。高压烧伤和电流烧伤的手术时间分别高于低压烧伤和电弧烧伤。在375例接受手术的患者中,83.2%(n = 312)接受了自体皮移植,49.3%(n = 185)需要皮瓣覆盖。常见的皮瓣类型为邻位皮瓣(50.3%)、随意皮瓣(42.2%)和带蒂皮瓣(35.7%)。107例(18.0%)患者进行了截肢,主要集中在手部(43.9%)和上肢(39.3%)。平均住院时间为42.9±46.3天,仅1例死亡(0.2%)。电流烧伤和手术次数较多分别是截肢和住院时间的主要危险因素。
在中国,电烧伤主要影响成年男性且多与职业暴露有关。自体皮移植和各种皮瓣常用于电烧伤创面处理。仍需要更规范有效的治疗和预防策略以降低截肢率。