• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

额颞叶痴呆患者言语流畅性表现的定性评估

Qualitative Assessment of Verbal Fluency Performance in Frontotemporal Dementia.

作者信息

van den Berg Esther, Jiskoot Lize C, Grosveld Mariëlle J H, van Swieten John C, Papma Janne M

机构信息

Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2017;44(1-2):35-44. doi: 10.1159/000477538. Epub 2017 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1159/000477538
PMID:28624827
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Verbal fluency is impaired in patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and primary progressive aphasia (PPA). This study explored qualitative differences in verbal fluency (clustering of words, switching between strategies) between FTD and PPA variants.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD) and 50 with PPA (13 nonfluent/agrammatic, 14 semantic, and 23 logopenic) performed a semantic and letter fluency task. Clustering (number of multiword strings) and switching (number of transitions between clustered and nonclustered words) were recorded by two independent raters. Between-group differences, associations with memory, language, and executive functioning, and longitudinal change (subsample) in clustering and switching were examined.

RESULTS

Interrater reliability was high (median 0.98). PPA patients generated (a) smaller (number of) clusters on semantic and letter fluency than bvFTD patients (p < 0.05). Semantic variant patients used more switches than nonfluent/agrammatic or logopenic variant patients (p < 0.05). Clustering in semantic fluency was significantly associated with memory and language (range standardized regression coefficients 0.24-0.38). Switching in letter fluency was associated with executive functioning (0.32-0.35).

CONCLUSION

Clustering and switching in verbal fluency differed between patients with subtypes of FTD and PPA. Qualitative aspects of verbal fluency provide additional information on verbal ability and executive control which can be used for clinically diagnostic purposes.

摘要

背景/目的:额颞叶痴呆(FTD)和原发性进行性失语(PPA)患者存在言语流畅性受损的情况。本研究探讨了FTD和PPA各亚型在言语流畅性(词语聚类、策略转换)方面的质性差异。

方法

29例行为变异型FTD(bvFTD)患者和50例PPA患者(13例非流畅性/语法缺失型、14例语义型和23例音韵性失写型)进行了语义和字母流畅性任务。由两名独立评分者记录聚类(多词串数量)和转换(聚类词与非聚类词之间的转换数量)情况。研究了组间差异、与记忆、语言和执行功能的关联以及聚类和转换的纵向变化(子样本)。

结果

评分者间信度较高(中位数为0.98)。PPA患者在语义和字母流畅性任务中生成的聚类(数量)比bvFTD患者小(p<0.05)。语义变异型患者比非流畅性/语法缺失型或音韵性失写型变异型患者使用更多的转换(p<0.05)。语义流畅性中的聚类与记忆和语言显著相关(标准化回归系数范围为0.24 - 0.38)。字母流畅性中的转换与执行功能相关(0.32 - 0.35)。

结论

FTD和PPA各亚型患者在言语流畅性的聚类和转换方面存在差异。言语流畅性的质性方面为言语能力和执行控制提供了额外信息,可用于临床诊断。

相似文献

1
Qualitative Assessment of Verbal Fluency Performance in Frontotemporal Dementia.额颞叶痴呆患者言语流畅性表现的定性评估
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2017;44(1-2):35-44. doi: 10.1159/000477538. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
2
Differential linguistic features of verbal fluency in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia and primary progressive aphasia.行为变异额颞叶痴呆和原发性进行性失语症言语流畅性的语言差异特征。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2024 Jul-Aug;31(4):669-677. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2022.2060748. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
3
Semantic fluency: cognitive basis and diagnostic performance in focal dementias and Alzheimer's disease.语义流畅性:局灶性痴呆和阿尔茨海默病的认知基础及诊断效能
Cortex. 2014 May;54:150-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Feb 22.
4
The underlying mechanisms of verbal fluency deficit in frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia.额颞叶痴呆和语义性痴呆中言语流畅性缺陷的潜在机制。
J Neurol. 2009 Jul;256(7):1083-94. doi: 10.1007/s00415-009-5073-y. Epub 2009 Apr 14.
5
Verbal fluency difficulties in aphasia: A combination of lexical and executive control deficits.失语症中的言语流畅性障碍:词汇和执行控制缺陷的组合。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 May;57(3):593-614. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12710. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
6
Semantic fluency in aphasia: clustering and switching in the course of 1 minute.失语症中的语义流畅性:1分钟内的聚类与转换
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 May;52(3):334-345. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12276. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
7
Memory and emotion processing performance contributes to the diagnosis of non-semantic primary progressive aphasia syndromes.记忆和情感处理能力有助于非语义性原发性进行性失语综合征的诊断。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;44(2):541-7. doi: 10.3233/JAD-141854.
8
A meta-analysis of neuropsychological, social cognitive, and olfactory functioning in the behavioral and language variants of frontotemporal dementia.一项关于行为和语言变异型额颞叶痴呆的神经心理学、社会认知和嗅觉功能的荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2019 Dec;49(16):2669-2680. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718003604. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
9
Language, executive function and social cognition in the diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia syndromes.语言、执行功能和社会认知在额颞叶痴呆综合征的诊断中的作用。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;25(2):178-96. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2013.763340.
10
The Language Profile of Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia.行为变异型额颞叶痴呆的语言特征
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;50(2):359-71. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150806.

引用本文的文献

1
Executive Function Deficits in Genetic Frontotemporal Dementia: Results From the GENFI Study.遗传性额颞叶痴呆的执行功能缺陷:GENFI研究结果
Neurol Genet. 2025 Jul 21;11(4):e200248. doi: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000200248. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Leveraging relatedness-based measures in people with language disorders: A scoping review.在语言障碍患者中利用基于关联性的测量方法:一项范围综述。
J Neuropsychol. 2025 Jun;19(2):299-337. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12405. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
3
Comparison of category and letter fluency tasks through automated analysis.
通过自动分析比较类别流畅性任务和字母流畅性任务。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 11;14:1212793. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1212793. eCollection 2023.
4
Longitudinal changes in qualitative aspects of semantic fluency in presymptomatic and prodromal genetic frontotemporal dementia.症状前和前驱性遗传性额颞叶痴呆语义流畅性定性方面的纵向变化。
J Neurol. 2023 Nov;270(11):5418-5435. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11845-5. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
5
Verbal fluency tests assess global cognitive status but have limited diagnostic differentiation: evidence from a large-scale examination of six neurodegenerative diseases.语言流畅性测试评估整体认知状态,但诊断鉴别能力有限:来自六种神经退行性疾病大规模检查的证据。
Brain Commun. 2023 Feb 21;5(2):fcad042. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad042. eCollection 2023.
6
Applying ACE-III, M-ACE and MMSE to Diagnostic Screening Assessment of Cognitive Functions within the Polish Population.运用 ACE-III、M-ACE 和 MMSE 对波兰人群认知功能的诊断筛查评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 27;19(19):12257. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912257.
7
Differential linguistic features of verbal fluency in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia and primary progressive aphasia.行为变异额颞叶痴呆和原发性进行性失语症言语流畅性的语言差异特征。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2024 Jul-Aug;31(4):669-677. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2022.2060748. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
8
Automated Analysis of Digitized Letter Fluency Data.数字化字母流畅性数据的自动化分析
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 29;12:654214. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.654214. eCollection 2021.
9
Comprehensive verbal fluency features predict executive function performance.全面的言语流畅性特征可预测执行功能表现。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 25;11(1):6929. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85981-1.
10
Aging Heads of State: The Politics of Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders.衰老的国家元首:痴呆症和老年认知障碍的政治。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2020;49(2):121-128. doi: 10.1159/000508660. Epub 2020 Aug 21.