• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多级前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与零切迹装置:安全性和可行性分析,重点关注矢状面排列及对临床结果的影响:单机构经验及文献综述

Multilevel Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion with Zero-Profile Devices: Analysis of Safety and Feasibility, with Focus on Sagittal Alignment and Impact on Clinical Outcome: Single-Institution Experience and Review of Literature.

作者信息

Albanese Vincenzo, Certo Francesco, Visocchi Massimiliano, Barbagallo Giuseppe M V

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, Policlinico "G. Rodolico" University Hospital, Catania, Italy.

Institute of Neurosurgery, Catholic University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2017 Oct;106:724-735. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.051. Epub 2017 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.051
PMID:28625909
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In multilevel degenerative conditions posterior approaches are often preferred, but anterior approaches provide comparable clinical results and better alignment. Anterior plating entails higher rates of soft tissue injuries and dysphagia, particularly in multilevel cases. This study evaluates efficacy and safety of zero-profile devices in 3- and 4-level anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion, analyzing patients' clinical and radiologic long-term outcomes.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 24 patients with cervical spondylotic myeloradiculopathy who underwent 3- and 4-level anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion with the zero-profile device. Mean follow-up was 39 months (range 24-72). Nurick grading was used for myelopathy, Neck Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale scores for arm and neck pain, and Short Form 36 survey for physical and mental health status. Postoperative radiograph and computed tomography were obtained after surgery, at 6 and 12 months, and at last follow-up to assess fusion rate and complications. Cervical alignment was measured by Cobb angle. Incidence of postoperative dysphagia was monitored according to Bazaz dysphagia index.

RESULTS

On last computed tomography scan, fusion was present in 49% of spaces (40 of 82). Mean neck and arm pain visual analog scale decreased from 6.7-1.6 (P < 0.01) and 5.9-0.9 (P < 0.01), respectively. Improvements in the Short Form 36 survey and Neck Disability Index were documented (P < 0.01). Lordosis was restored in all patients. Five of 24 patients complained of mild dysphagia (20.8%): in three (12.5%) short-term dysphagia and in two (8.3%) medium-term dysphagia. No long-term dysphagia (≥6 months) was observed.

CONCLUSION

Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion with a zero-profile device is effective and safe for 3- and 4-level cervical spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. It allows to restore cervical lordosis and achieve long-term satisfactory clinical outcome.

摘要

背景

在多节段退变疾病中,后路手术通常更受青睐,但前路手术能提供相当的临床效果且对线更好。前路钢板固定导致软组织损伤和吞咽困难的发生率更高,尤其是在多节段病例中。本研究评估零切迹装置在三、四节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中的有效性和安全性,分析患者的临床和影像学长期结果。

方法

我们前瞻性纳入了24例患有脊髓型颈椎病神经根病的患者,他们接受了三、四节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除并使用零切迹装置进行融合。平均随访时间为39个月(范围24 - 72个月)。采用Nurick分级评估脊髓病,采用颈部残疾指数和视觉模拟量表评分评估手臂和颈部疼痛,采用简短健康调查问卷评估身心健康状况。术后在手术时、6个月、12个月及最后一次随访时获取X线片和计算机断层扫描,以评估融合率和并发症。通过Cobb角测量颈椎对线情况。根据Bazaz吞咽困难指数监测术后吞咽困难的发生率。

结果

在最后一次计算机断层扫描时,82个间隙中有49%(40个)实现了融合。颈部和手臂疼痛视觉模拟量表评分分别从6.7降至1.�P < 0.01)和从5.9降至0.9(P < 0.01)。简短健康调查问卷和颈部残疾指数均有改善(P < 0.01)。所有患者的前凸均得以恢复。24例患者中有5例主诉轻度吞咽困难(20.8%):3例(12.5%)为短期吞咽困难,2例(8.3%)为中期吞咽困难。未观察到长期吞咽困难(≥6个月)。

结论

对于三、四节段脊髓型颈椎病神经根病,采用零切迹装置进行颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术是有效且安全的。它能够恢复颈椎前凸并取得长期满意的临床效果。

相似文献

1
Multilevel Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion with Zero-Profile Devices: Analysis of Safety and Feasibility, with Focus on Sagittal Alignment and Impact on Clinical Outcome: Single-Institution Experience and Review of Literature.多级前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与零切迹装置:安全性和可行性分析,重点关注矢状面排列及对临床结果的影响:单机构经验及文献综述
World Neurosurg. 2017 Oct;106:724-735. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.051. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
2
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device: a clinical and radiological study: Clinical article.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术联合零切迹一体化板和间隔器装置:一项临床和影像学研究:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):529-37. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE12951. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
3
Comparison of anterior cervical fusion after two-level discectomy or single-level corpectomy: sagittal alignment, cervical lordosis, graft collapse, and adjacent-level ossification.两种手术方式(两节段椎间盘切除术或单节段椎体次全切除术)治疗颈椎间盘疾病后颈椎融合的比较:矢状位曲度、颈椎前凸度、移植物塌陷及临近节段骨化。
Spine J. 2010 Mar;10(3):193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.09.006. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
4
Early follow-up outcomes of a new zero-profile implant used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.一种用于颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的新型零轮廓植入物的早期随访结果。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Jul;26(5):E193-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31827a2812.
5
Zero-Profile Spacer Versus Cage-Plate Construct in Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.零切迹椎间融合器与椎间融合器-钢板系统在前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病中的应用:系统评价与Meta分析
World Neurosurg. 2017 Aug;104:545-553. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.045. Epub 2017 May 17.
6
Comparison of a zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) and the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with an anterior plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.零轮廓锚定椎间融合器(ROI-C)与聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合器联合前路钢板用于多节段脊髓型颈椎病前路椎间盘切除融合术的比较。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jun;25(6):1881-90. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4500-x. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
7
Two-level corpectomy versus three-level discectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a comparison of perioperative, radiographic, and clinical outcomes.颈椎脊髓病的两级椎体次全切除术与三级椎间盘切除术:围手术期、影像学及临床结果比较
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Sep;23(3):280-9. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.SPINE14545. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
8
Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with posterior spinal fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: influence of cervical alignment on outcomes.多节段脊髓型颈椎病的椎板成形术与后路脊柱融合椎板切除术:颈椎对线对疗效的影响。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Nov;27(5):508-517. doi: 10.3171/2017.4.SPINE16831. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
9
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with stand-alone anchored cages versus posterior laminectomy and fusion for four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up.前路颈椎间盘切除及独立锚定椎间融合器融合术与后路椎板切除术及融合术治疗四节段脊髓型颈椎病的回顾性研究:两年随访
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 12;19(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2136-1.
10
Comparison of Curvature Between the Zero-P Spacer and Traditional Cage and Plate After 3-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Mid-term Results.三级前路颈椎间盘切除融合术后零切迹椎间融合器与传统椎间融合器及钢板的曲度比较:中期结果
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Oct;30(8):E1111-E1116. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000440.

引用本文的文献

1
[Comparison of effectiveness between zero-profile anchored cage and plate-cage construct in treatment of consecutive three-level cervical spondylosis].零切迹椎间融合器与钢板-椎间融合器治疗连续三节段颈椎病的疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Feb 15;39(2):193-200. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202410092.
2
Characterization of dysphagia following anterior cervical spine surgery.颈椎前路手术后吞咽困难的特征分析
Adv Comm Swallowing. 2021;24(1):55-62. doi: 10.3233/acs-210034. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
3
Changes in cervical alignment of Zero-profile device versus conventional cage-plate construct after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis.
零切迹装置与传统笼板结构在前路颈椎间盘切除融合术后颈椎曲度变化的Meta 分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Nov 24;17(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03400-1.
4
Is the Zero-P Spacer Suitable for 3-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery in Terms of Sagittal Alignment Reconstruction: A Comparison Study with Traditional Plate and Cage System.就矢状位对线重建而言,零切迹椎间融合器是否适用于三节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术:与传统钢板和椎间融合器系统的比较研究
Brain Sci. 2022 Nov 19;12(11):1583. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12111583.
5
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with zero-profile versus stand-alone cages for two-level cervical spondylosis: A retrospective cohort study.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术:零切迹椎间融合器与单独椎间融合器治疗双节段颈椎病的回顾性队列研究
Front Surg. 2022 Nov 2;9:1002744. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1002744. eCollection 2022.
6
A Comparison of 2 Anterior Hybrid Techniques for 3-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease.两种前路混合技术治疗三节段颈椎间盘退变疾病的比较
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Nov 6;26:e927972. doi: 10.12659/MSM.927972.
7
Locking stand-alone cage versus anterior plate construct in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.后路单开门椎管扩大成形术与颈椎前路减压融合术治疗颈椎间盘突出症的疗效比较:一项基于随机对照试验的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Nov;29(11):2734-2744. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06561-x. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
8
Can Self-Locking Cages Offer the Same Clinical Outcomes as Anterior Cage-with-Plate Fixation for 3-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) in Mid-Term Follow-Up?自锁 Cage 是否能在中期随访中获得与前路 Cage-钢板固定相同的临床效果?用于治疗三节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Jan 19;25:547-557. doi: 10.12659/MSM.911234.