Suppr超能文献

零轮廓锚定椎间融合器(ROI-C)与聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合器联合前路钢板用于多节段脊髓型颈椎病前路椎间盘切除融合术的比较。

Comparison of a zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) and the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with an anterior plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

作者信息

Liu Yijie, Wang Heng, Li Xuefeng, Chen Jie, Sun Han, Wang Genlin, Yang Huilin, Jiang Weimin

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188 Shizi Street, Suzhou, 215006, China.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2016 Jun;25(6):1881-90. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4500-x. Epub 2016 Mar 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We aimed to analyze the clinical and radiographic efficacy of a new zero-profile anchored spacer called the ROI-C in anterior discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM).

METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical, radiological outcomes and complications of multilevel ACDF with the ROI-C or with the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with an anterior plate. From April 2011 to April 2014, 60 patients with MCSM were operated on using ACDF, with the ROI-C in 28 patients and PEEK cages with an anterior plate in 32 patients. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and clinical and radiological results were compared between the ROI-C group and the cage-plate group.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 23.8 ± 6.6 months, ranging from 12 to 36 months. At the first month and the last follow-up, the neck disability index (NDI) scores were decreased, and the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores were significantly increased, compared with the presurgical measurements in both groups. There were no significant differences in NDI scores or JOA scores between the two groups (P > 0.05), but there were significant differences in the operation time, blood loss and the presence of dysphagia (P < 0.05). In addition, the cervical Cobb angle and disk height showed significant corrections, compared to those measured before the operation. There was no adjacent disc degeneration observed in the ROI-C group, and one patient with skip levels showed disc degeneration of the normal level between the skip levels in the cage-plate group. The degeneration rate of the cage-plate group was 3.1 %.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary clinical and radiographic efficacies of both ROI-C and cages with plates in ACDF for MCSM were satisfactory; both approaches could improve and maintain cervical lordosis and disk height. However, the ROI-C was associated with a simpler operation, a shorter operation time, less blood loss, and a lower risk of postoperative dysphagia compared to the PEEK cage with an anterior plate.

摘要

目的

我们旨在分析一种名为ROI-C的新型零轮廓锚定椎间融合器在前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病(MCSM)中的临床和影像学疗效。

方法

我们回顾性分析了采用ROI-C或带前路钢板的聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合器进行多节段ACDF的临床、放射学结果及并发症。2011年4月至2014年4月,60例MCSM患者接受了ACDF手术,其中28例使用ROI-C,32例使用带前路钢板的PEEK椎间融合器。比较ROI-C组和椎间融合器-钢板组的手术时间、术中出血量以及临床和放射学结果。

结果

平均随访时间为23.8±6.6个月,范围为12至36个月。与术前测量值相比,两组在术后第1个月和末次随访时,颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)评分均降低,日本骨科协会(JOA)评分均显著升高。两组间NDI评分或JOA评分无显著差异(P>0.05),但手术时间、出血量及吞咽困难的发生率存在显著差异(P<0.05)。此外,与术前测量值相比,颈椎Cobb角和椎间盘高度均有显著改善。ROI-C组未观察到相邻节段椎间盘退变,椎间融合器-钢板组有1例跳跃节段患者在跳跃节段之间的正常节段出现椎间盘退变。椎间融合器-钢板组的退变率为3.1%。

结论

ROI-C和带钢板的椎间融合器在ACDF治疗MCSM中的主要临床和影像学疗效均令人满意;两种方法均可改善并维持颈椎前凸和椎间盘高度。然而,与带前路钢板的PEEK椎间融合器相比,ROI-C手术操作更简单,手术时间更短,出血量更少,术后吞咽困难风险更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验