Rico Adriana, Pollack Lori A, Thompson Trevor D, Hsieh Mei-Chin, Wu Xiao-Cheng, Karlitz Jordan J, West Dee W, Rainey John M, Chen Vivien W
Cancer Surveillance Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
Louisiana Tumor Registry and Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States.
J Cancer Res Ther (Manch). 2016;5(2):7-13. doi: 10.14312/2052-4994.2017-2. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
In 2011, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommended testing for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Our study assessed testing prevalence and its association with socio-demographic and clinical factors and examined first-line treatment.
Ten state population-based registries supported by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) collected detailed cancer information on mCRC cases diagnosed in 2011, including biomarker testing and first-line treatment from ten central cancer registries. Data were analyzed with Chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression.
Of the 3,608 mCRC cases, 27% (n = 992) had a documented test. Increased age at diagnosis (p < 0.0001), racial/ethnic minorities (p = 0.0155), public insurance (p = 0.0018), and lower census tract education (p = 0.0023) were associated with less testing. Significant geographic variation in testing (p < 0.0001) ranged from 46% in New Hampshire to 18% in California. After adjusting for all covariates, age and residence at diagnosis (both p < 0.0001) remained predictors of testing. Non-Hispanic Blacks had less testing than non-Hispanic Whites (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61-0.97). Among those tested and found to have normal (wild-type) , 7% received anti-EGFR treatment; none received such treatment among those with mutated gene.
Despite NCCN guideline recommendations, 73% of mCRC cases diagnosed in 2011 had no documented test. Disparities in testing existed based on age, race, and residence at diagnosis.
These findings show the capacity of monitoring testing in the US using cancer registry data and suggest the need to understand the low uptake of testing, and associated treatment choices during the first year since diagnosis.
2011年,美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)建议对转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者进行检测。我们的研究评估了检测的普及率及其与社会人口统计学和临床因素的关联,并研究了一线治疗情况。
由疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的国家癌症登记计划(NPCR)支持的10个基于州人口的登记处收集了2011年确诊的mCRC病例的详细癌症信息,包括来自10个中央癌症登记处的生物标志物检测和一线治疗信息。数据采用卡方检验和多因素逻辑回归进行分析。
在3608例mCRC病例中,27%(n = 992)有检测记录。诊断时年龄增加(p < 0.0001)、种族/族裔少数群体(p = 0.0155)参保、公共保险(p = 0.0018)以及普查区教育程度较低(p = 0.0023)与检测较少相关。检测存在显著的地理差异(p < 0.0001),范围从新罕布什尔州的46%到加利福尼亚州的18%。在对所有协变量进行调整后,诊断时的年龄和居住地(均为p < 0.0001)仍然是检测的预测因素。非西班牙裔黑人的检测少于非西班牙裔白人(OR = 0.77,95% CI = 0.61 - 0.97)。在检测发现为正常(野生型)的患者中,7%接受了抗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)治疗;在基因发生突变的患者中无人接受此类治疗。
尽管有NCCN指南建议,但2011年确诊的mCRC病例中有73%没有检测记录。检测在年龄、种族和诊断时的居住地方面存在差异。
这些发现显示了利用癌症登记数据监测美国检测情况的能力,并表明需要了解检测利用率低以及确诊后第一年相关治疗选择的情况。