• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗复杂性皮肤及软组织感染的临床疗效

Clinical efficacy of piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections.

作者信息

Takimoto Kohei, Wang Qianzhi, Suzuki Daisuke, Katayama Mitsuya, Hayashi Yoshiro

机构信息

a Department of Intensive Care Medicine , Kameda Medical Center , Kamogawa , Japan.

b Postgraduate Education Center , Kameda Medical Center , Kamogawa , Japan.

出版信息

Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2017 Jul;18(10):1027-1034. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2017.1341491. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1080/14656566.2017.1341491
PMID:28627952
Abstract

Complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs) are skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) that involve deep soft tissue. cSSTIs often require surgical intervention and/or hospitalization. cSSTIs are associated with significant mortality and morbidity, and carry a significant burden on health care systems. Piperacillin/tazobactam has been regarded as a standard treatment for cSSTIs because of its antibiotic spectrum, safety and clinical efficacy. Several antibiotics, as compared to piperacillin/tazobactam, have been evaluated in the treatment of cSSTIs. Areas covered: This review summarizes randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the clinical efficacy of piperacillin/tazobactam for the treatment of cSSTIs. Expert opinion: Piperacillin/tazobactam, which covers most causative organisms in cSSTIs, is the drug of choice for the treatment of cSSTIs. Other options such as ertapenem and moxifloxacin may be reasonable where multiple daily dosing or intravenous administration is inappropriate. But in general, they should be avoided as an empirical treatment because of their highly association with resistant bacteria, which are becoming a global threat. Therefore, piperacilin/tazobactam is appropriate as an empirical therapy for the treatment of SSTIs and should be de-escalated as soon as causative organisms are identified, their drug-sensitivity results are available, and clinical condition becomes stable.

摘要

复杂皮肤及软组织感染(cSSTIs)是累及深部软组织的皮肤及软组织感染(SSTIs)。cSSTIs通常需要手术干预和/或住院治疗。cSSTIs与显著的死亡率和发病率相关,给医疗保健系统带来重大负担。哌拉西林/他唑巴坦因其抗菌谱、安全性和临床疗效,一直被视为cSSTIs的标准治疗药物。与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦相比,已有多种抗生素被评估用于治疗cSSTIs。涵盖领域:本综述总结了评估哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗cSSTIs临床疗效的随机对照试验(RCTs)。专家观点:哌拉西林/他唑巴坦覆盖了cSSTIs中的大多数致病微生物,是治疗cSSTIs的首选药物。在每日多次给药或静脉给药不合适的情况下,厄他培南和莫西沙星等其他选择可能是合理的。但一般来说,由于它们与耐药菌高度相关,而耐药菌正成为全球威胁,因此应避免将其作为经验性治疗药物。因此,哌拉西林/他唑巴坦适合作为SSTIs的经验性治疗药物,一旦确定致病微生物、获得其药敏结果且临床状况稳定,就应尽快降阶梯治疗。

相似文献

1
Clinical efficacy of piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗复杂性皮肤及软组织感染的临床疗效
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2017 Jul;18(10):1027-1034. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2017.1341491. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
2
Clinafloxacin versus piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of severe skin and soft-tissue infections in adults at a Veterans Affairs medical center.在一家退伍军人事务医疗中心,克林沙星与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗成人严重皮肤和软组织感染的对比研究。
Clin Ther. 2002 Jan;24(1):59-72. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)85005-6.
3
Efficacy and safety of piperacillin/tazobactam in skin and soft tissue infections.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗皮肤及软组织感染的疗效与安全性。
Eur J Surg Suppl. 1994(573):51-5.
4
Ertapenem versus piperacillin-tazobactam for treatment of mixed anaerobic complicated intra-abdominal, complicated skin and skin structure, and acute pelvic infections.厄他培南与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦治疗混合性厌氧性复杂性腹腔内感染、复杂性皮肤及皮肤结构感染和急性盆腔感染的比较
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2002 Winter;3(4):303-14. doi: 10.1089/109629602762539535.
5
Ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections: results of a double-blind, randomized comparative phase III trial.厄他培南与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗复杂性腹腔内感染:一项双盲、随机对照III期试验的结果
Ann Surg. 2003 Feb;237(2):235-45. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000048551.32606.73.
6
Ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam for the treatment of complicated infections: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.厄他培南与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗复杂性感染:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2009 Dec 2;9:193. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-193.
7
General microbiology and in vitro susceptibility of anaerobes isolated from complicated skin and skin-structure infections in patients enrolled in a comparative trial of ertapenem versus piperacillin-tazobactam.在厄他培南与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦对比试验中,从复杂皮肤及皮肤结构感染患者中分离出的厌氧菌的一般微生物学及体外药敏情况
Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Sep 1;35(Suppl 1):S119-25. doi: 10.1086/341932.
8
A randomized trial of the efficacy and safety of sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin monotherapy versus intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam followed by oral amoxicillin/clavulanate for complicated skin and skin structure infections.一项比较序贯静脉/口服莫西沙星单药治疗与静脉注射哌拉西林/他唑巴坦后继以口服阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗复杂性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的疗效和安全性的随机试验。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Nov;66(11):2632-42. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr344. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
9
Pharmacodynamic modeling of imipenem-cilastatin, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam for empiric therapy of skin and soft tissue infections: a report from the OPTAMA Program.亚胺培南-西司他丁、美罗培南和哌拉西林-他唑巴坦用于皮肤和软组织感染经验性治疗的药效学建模:OPTAMA项目报告
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2005 Winter;6(4):419-26. doi: 10.1089/sur.2005.6.419.
10
Ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam for diabetic foot infections in China: a Phase 3, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial.厄他培南对比哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗中国糖尿病足感染:一项 3 期、多中心、随机、双盲、阳性药物对照、非劣效性临床试验。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Jun;71(6):1688-96. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw004. Epub 2016 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Skin and soft tissue infections in hospitalized cancer patients: A retrospective study.住院癌症患者的皮肤和软组织感染:一项回顾性研究。
Saudi Med J. 2021 Dec;42(12):1333-1340. doi: 10.15537/smj.2021.42.12.20210624.
2
Overcoming Multidrug Resistance and Biofilms of with a Single Dual-Function Potentiator of β-Lactams.用一种双重β-内酰胺类药物增效剂克服 的多药耐药和生物膜。
ACS Infect Dis. 2020 May 8;6(5):1085-1097. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00486. Epub 2020 Apr 6.