• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗皮肤及软组织感染的疗效与安全性。

Efficacy and safety of piperacillin/tazobactam in skin and soft tissue infections.

作者信息

File T M, Tan J S

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Akron City Hospital, Ohio.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Suppl. 1994(573):51-5.

PMID:7524796
Abstract

Piperacillin/tazobactam has excellent in vitro activity against the most pathogens involved in skin infections. Two large multicentre studies recently evaluated the efficacy and safety of piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections in patients in hospital. The efficacy and safety of piperacillin/tazobactam (4 g/500 mg every 8 hours) have been assessed in an open study in Europe. Among 120 evaluable patients, 93% were clinically cured or improved. Only six patients were withdrawn from the study because of side effects. In another trial, piperacillin/tazobactam were compared with ticarcillin/clavulanate in a double-blinded prospective study in the United States. Of evaluable patients, 67 received piperacillin/tazobactam (3 g/375 mg every 6 hours) and 44 received ticarcillin/clavulanate (3 g/100 mg every 6 hours). At assessment, 76% of patients given piperacillin/tazobactam and 77% of patients given ticarcillin/clavulanate had responded favourably. The lower success rate in this trial may be attributed to more stringent inclusion criteria that resulted in the incorporation of a higher proportion of patients with more severe conditions including diabetic/ischaemic foot infections. The incidence of adverse reactions was similar in both groups. Piperacillin/tazobactam seems to be both effective and safe in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections in patients confined to hospital.

摘要

哌拉西林/他唑巴坦对大多数引起皮肤感染的病原体具有出色的体外活性。最近两项大型多中心研究评估了哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗住院患者皮肤和软组织感染的疗效和安全性。在欧洲的一项开放性研究中评估了哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(每8小时4g/500mg)的疗效和安全性。在120例可评估患者中,93%临床治愈或病情改善。仅有6例患者因副作用退出研究。在另一项试验中,在美国的一项双盲前瞻性研究中,将哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与替卡西林/克拉维酸进行了比较。在可评估患者中,67例接受哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(每6小时3g/375mg),44例接受替卡西林/克拉维酸(每6小时3g/100mg)。评估时,接受哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗的患者中有76%反应良好,接受替卡西林/克拉维酸治疗的患者中有77%反应良好。该试验中较低的成功率可能归因于更严格的纳入标准,导致纳入了更高比例病情更严重的患者,包括糖尿病/缺血性足部感染患者。两组不良反应发生率相似。哌拉西林/他唑巴坦在治疗住院患者皮肤和软组织感染方面似乎既有效又安全。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of piperacillin/tazobactam in skin and soft tissue infections.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗皮肤及软组织感染的疗效与安全性。
Eur J Surg Suppl. 1994(573):51-5.
2
A randomized controlled clinical trial on piperacillin/tazobactam versus ticarcillin/clavulanic acid for the treatment of bacterial infections.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与替卡西林/克拉维酸治疗细菌感染的随机对照临床试验
Chin Med J (Engl). 1998 Nov;111(11):1039-43.
3
Efficacy and safety of piperacillin/tazobactam in intra-abdominal infections.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗腹腔内感染的疗效与安全性。
Eur J Surg Suppl. 1994(573):57-60.
4
Piperacillin/tazobactam compared with cefuroxime/ metronidazole in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与头孢呋辛/甲硝唑治疗腹腔内感染的比较。
Eur J Surg. 1999 Sep;165(9):875-84. doi: 10.1080/11024159950189393.
5
Results of the North American trial of piperacillin/tazobactam compared with clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections. Investigators of the Piperacillin/Tazobactam Intra-abdominal Infection Study Group.北美哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与克林霉素和庆大霉素治疗严重腹腔内感染的试验结果。哌拉西林/他唑巴坦腹腔内感染研究组的研究人员。
Eur J Surg Suppl. 1994(573):61-6.
6
Comparative evaluation of the in vitro activity of three combinations of beta-lactams with beta-lactamase inhibitors: piperacillin/tazobactam, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid and ampicillin/sulbactam.β-内酰胺类与β-内酰胺酶抑制剂三种组合(哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、替卡西林/克拉维酸和氨苄西林/舒巴坦)体外活性的比较评价
Braz J Infect Dis. 2000 Feb;4(1):22-8.
7
Treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections.皮肤及软组织感染的治疗
Am J Surg. 1995 May;169(5A Suppl):27S-33S.
8
Piperacillin/tazobactam compared with ticarcillin/clavulanate in community-acquired bacterial lower respiratory tract infection.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与替卡西林/克拉维酸治疗社区获得性细菌性下呼吸道感染的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994 Oct;34(4):565-77. doi: 10.1093/jac/34.4.565.
9
Piperacillin and tazobactam versus clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of hospitalized women with pelvic infection. The Piperacillin/tazobactam Study Group.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与克林霉素和庆大霉素治疗住院盆腔感染女性的疗效比较。哌拉西林/他唑巴坦研究组
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Feb;83(2):280-6.
10
Treating diabetic foot infections with sequential intravenous to oral moxifloxacin compared with piperacillin-tazobactam/amoxicillin-clavulanate.与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦/阿莫西林-克拉维酸相比,序贯静脉注射至口服莫西沙星治疗糖尿病足感染。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Aug;60(2):370-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm130. Epub 2007 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective evaluating the appropriate use of piperacillin /tazobactam in cardiac center of a tertiary care hospital.前瞻性评估哌拉西林/他唑巴坦在一家三级护理医院心脏中心的合理使用情况。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 May 1;15(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01109-y.
2
Systemic antibiotics for treating diabetic foot infections.用于治疗糖尿病足感染的全身性抗生素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 4;2015(9):CD009061. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009061.pub2.
3
Piperacillin/Tazobactam (ZOSYN).哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(特治星)。
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1996;4(5):258-62. doi: 10.1155/S1064744996000506.
4
A practical guide to the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections.复杂皮肤及软组织感染治疗实用指南
Drugs. 2003;63(14):1459-80. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363140-00003.
5
Clinafloxacin versus piperacillin-tazobactam in treatment of patients with severe skin and soft tissue infections.克林沙星与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦治疗重症皮肤及软组织感染患者的疗效比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Feb;45(2):525-31. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.2.525-531.2001.
6
Piperacillin/tazobactam: an updated review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦:其在治疗细菌感染中的应用最新综述
Drugs. 1999 May;57(5):805-43. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199957050-00017.