Honkala Sanna M, Motiani Kumail K, Eskelinen Jari-Joonas, Savolainen Anna, Saunavaara Virva, Virtanen Kirsi A, Löyttyniemi Eliisa, Kapanen Jukka, Knuuti Juhani, Kalliokoski Kari K, Hannukainen Jarna C
1Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, FINLAND; 2Turku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital, Turku, FINLAND; 3Department of Medical Physics, Turku University Hospital, Turku, FINLAND; 4Department of Biostatistics, University of Turku, Turku, FINLAND; and 5Paavo Nurmi Centre, University of Turku, Turku, FINLAND.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Jul;49(7):1313-1322. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001232.
Epicardial (EAT) and pericardial (PAT) fat masses and myocardial triglyceride content (MTC) are enlarged in obesity and insulin resistance. We studied whether the high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) similarly decrease ectopic fat in and around the heart and whether the decrease is similar in healthy subjects and subjects with defective glucose tolerance (DGT).
A total of 28 healthy men (body mass index = 20.7-30.0 kg·m, age = 40-55 yr) and 16 men with DGT (body mass index = 23.8-33.5 kg·m, age = 43-53 yr) were randomized into HIIT and MICT interventions for 2 wk. EAT and PAT were determined by computed tomography and MTC by H-MRS.
At baseline, DGT subjects had impaired aerobic capacity and insulin sensitivity and higher levels of whole body fat, visceral fat, PAT, and EAT (P < 0.05, all) compared with healthy subjects. In the whole group, HIIT increased aerobic capacity (HIIT = 6%, MICT = 0.3%; time × training P = 0.007) and tended to improve insulin sensitivity (HIIT = 24%, MICT = 8%) as well as reduce MTC (HIIT = -42%, MICT = +23%) (time × training P = 0.06, both) more efficiently compared with MICT, and without differences in the training response between the healthy and the DGT subjects. However, both training modes decreased EAT (-5%) and PAT (-6%) fat (time P < 0.05) and not differently between the healthy and the DGT subjects.
Whole body fat, visceral fat, PAT, and EAT masses are enlarged in DGT. Both HIIT and MICT effectively reduce EAT and PAT in healthy and DGT subjects, whereas HIIT seems to be superior as regards improving aerobic capacity, whole-body insulin sensitivity, and MTC.
肥胖和胰岛素抵抗时,心外膜脂肪(EAT)、心包脂肪(PAT)以及心肌甘油三酯含量(MTC)会增加。我们研究了高强度间歇训练(HIIT)和中等强度持续训练(MICT)是否能同样程度地减少心脏内及周围的异位脂肪,以及在健康受试者和糖耐量受损(DGT)受试者中这种减少是否相似。
总共28名健康男性(体重指数=20.7 - 30.0 kg·m,年龄=40 - 55岁)和16名DGT男性(体重指数=23.8 - 33.5 kg·m,年龄=43 - 53岁)被随机分为HIIT组和MICT组,进行为期2周的干预。通过计算机断层扫描测定EAT和PAT,通过氢磁共振波谱(H - MRS)测定MTC。
在基线时,与健康受试者相比,DGT受试者的有氧能力和胰岛素敏感性受损,全身脂肪、内脏脂肪、PAT和EAT水平更高(所有P<0.05)。在整个组中,与MICT相比,HIIT更有效地提高了有氧能力(HIIT = 6%,MICT = 0.3%;时间×训练P = 0.007),并倾向于改善胰岛素敏感性(HIIT = 24%,MICT = 8%)以及降低MTC(HIIT = - 42%,MICT = + 23%)(时间×训练P = 0.06,两者);健康受试者和DGT受试者之间的训练反应没有差异。然而,两种训练方式均降低了EAT(-5%)和PAT(-6%)脂肪(时间P<0.05),且健康受试者和DGT受试者之间没有差异。
DGT患者的全身脂肪、内脏脂肪、PAT和EAT量增加。HIIT和MICT均可有效减少健康受试者和DGT受试者的EAT和PAT,而HIIT在提高有氧能力、全身胰岛素敏感性和MTC方面似乎更具优势。