Simon Fraser University, Canada.
University of Calgary, Canada.
Health (London). 2019 Jan;23(1):39-57. doi: 10.1177/1363459317715776. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
In Canada, the issue of creating safe and inclusive school environments for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer students has been in the spotlight. Several researchers and advocates have pointed out the positive effects of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer-positive policy frameworks on the health and wellbeing of all young people. In this article, we take a critical approach to analyzing narrative findings from qualitative interviews conducted with youth in three communities in British Columbia, Canada: "the North," Vancouver, and Abbotsford. Using a Foucauldian Discourse Analytic Approach and Butler's concept of Citationality, our analysis suggested that although explicit homophobia was largely absent from youth discussions, young people discursively constructed lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer identities and "communities" in ways that reified heteronormativity. Youth made references to sociopolitical discourses of libertarianism and liberalism and to homonormative stereotypes regarding gay masculinity. A few young people also alluded to egalitarian, queer-positive discourses, which appeared to interrogate structures of heteronormativity. Since studies suggest a connection between the existence of institutional supports for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer students in schools and their mental and physical wellbeing, we conclude by considering the limitations and possibilities of these sociopolitical discourses in the struggle for sexual and gender equity, and how they might help frame future health-related, anti-homophobia policy frameworks in educational settings.
在加拿大,为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿学生创建安全包容的学校环境的问题一直备受关注。几位研究人员和倡导者指出,女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿友好政策框架对所有年轻人的健康和幸福有积极影响。在本文中,我们采用批判的方法分析了在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省三个社区(“北部”、温哥华和阿伯茨福德)对年轻人进行的定性访谈的叙述性发现:使用福柯的话语分析方法和巴特勒的引文概念,我们的分析表明,尽管青年讨论中基本上没有明确的同性恋恐惧症,但年轻人以强化异性恋规范的方式来构建女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿的身份和“社区”。年轻人提到了关于自由主义和自由意志主义的社会政治话语,以及关于同性恋男性气质的同规范刻板印象。少数年轻人还提到了平等主义、酷儿友好的话语,这些话语似乎对异性恋规范的结构提出了质疑。由于研究表明学校为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿学生提供的制度支持与他们的身心健康之间存在联系,因此我们最后考虑了这些社会政治话语在争取性和性别平等方面的局限性和可能性,以及它们如何在教育环境中帮助构建未来与健康相关的反同性恋恐惧症政策框架。