Jones C T, Chen C Y, Campbell B G, Fransson B A
a Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences , College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University , Pullman , WA 99164-6610 , USA.
b Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island , 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island , Canada C1A 4P3.
N Z Vet J. 2017 Sep;65(5):248-251. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2017.1344586. Epub 2017 Jul 2.
To compare the combination of suture and tissue adhesive with suture alone for closure of enterotomy incisions in an ex vivo caprine jejunal model, by measuring the intraluminal pressure at which leakage occurred and the proportion of closures that leaked at intraluminal pressures <40 mmHg.
Jejunal tissue was harvested from a goat following euthanasia, and enterotomy incisions (4 mm in length) were made in each of 24 isolated jejunal segments. The enterotomies were randomly assigned to be closed using a single interrupted suture alone (n=12) or in combination with biopolymer tissue adhesive (n=12). The jejunal segments were infused with saline containing fluorescent dye and leakage pressure was defined as the peak pressure attained when visible leakage of saline solution occurred. The number of enterotomies that did or did not exhibit leakage at <40 mmHg intraluminal pressure was also recorded.
Enterotomies closed using a combination of suture and tissue adhesive leaked at higher intraluminal pressure (58.2 (SD 4.7) mmHg) than those closed with suture alone (29.8 (SD 4.2) mmHg; p<0.001). The proportion of enterotomy closures in which the intraluminal pressure failed to reach 40 mmHg before leakage occurred was higher in enterotomies closed using suture alone (9/12, 75%) compared to those closed using both suture and tissue adhesive (3/12, 25%; p=0.002).
Use of tissue adhesive in addition to sutures increased the intraluminal pressure achieved before leakage occurred, compared to sutures alone, following enterotomy closure in a caprine cadaver model. In vivo studies are indicated to further assess the value of supplementing intestinal suture lines with tissue adhesive.
在体外山羊空肠模型中,通过测量发生渗漏时的腔内压力以及腔内压力<40 mmHg时发生渗漏的闭合口比例,比较缝线与组织粘合剂联合使用和单纯使用缝线闭合肠切开切口的效果。
对一只安乐死的山羊采集空肠组织,在24个分离的空肠段上分别制作长度为4 mm的肠切开切口。将肠切开切口随机分为单纯使用单根间断缝线闭合(n = 12)或联合生物聚合物组织粘合剂闭合(n = 12)。向空肠段内注入含荧光染料的盐水,渗漏压力定义为盐水溶液出现可见渗漏时达到的峰值压力。记录腔内压力<40 mmHg时出现或未出现渗漏的肠切开切口数量。
使用缝线和组织粘合剂联合闭合的肠切开切口在更高的腔内压力(58.2(标准差4.7)mmHg)下发生渗漏,高于单纯使用缝线闭合的切口(29.8(标准差4.2)mmHg;p<0.001)。单纯使用缝线闭合的肠切开切口中,腔内压力在渗漏发生前未达到40 mmHg的比例(9/12,75%)高于使用缝线和组织粘合剂联合闭合的切口(3/12,25%;p = 0.002)。
在山羊尸体模型中,肠切开切口闭合后,与单纯使用缝线相比,联合使用组织粘合剂可提高渗漏发生前达到的腔内压力。需要进行体内研究以进一步评估用组织粘合剂补充肠缝线的价值。