Zagra Luigi
Hip Department, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan Italy.
EFORT Open Rev. 2017 May 11;2(5):171-178. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.170008. eCollection 2017 May.
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery has shown dramatic changes in terms of increased number of procedures and of technical development in recent years. It has been described as "the operation of the 20 century" for the excellent results, the high satisfaction of the patients and the improvement of the quality of life.A lot of variations have been introduced over the last few decades in THA especially in terms of indications (both in younger and older patients), techniques and devices (approaches, tissue preservation, biomaterials and industrial finishing), per-operative management (blood loss and pain control) and post-operative protocols (the so called "fast track" surgery). Looking at all these advances the emerging question is: have all of them been justified both in terms of improvement of the results for the patients and of the cost/benefit ratio from an economical point of view?The purpose of this paper is to critically analyse the advantages and the disadvantages of the theoretically proposed "advances in hip arthroplasty" and attempt to understand which are justified of such "advances" nowadays, based on the international and the European perspective with a focus on the author's personal clinical experience. Cite this article: 2017;2. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.170008. Originally published online at www.efortopenreviews.org.
近年来,全髋关节置换术(THA)手术在手术数量增加和技术发展方面发生了巨大变化。它因其出色的效果、患者的高度满意度以及生活质量的改善而被称为“20世纪的手术”。在过去几十年里,THA引入了许多变化,特别是在适应症(年轻和老年患者)、技术和设备(手术入路、组织保留、生物材料和工业加工)、术中管理(失血和疼痛控制)以及术后方案(所谓的“快速康复”手术)方面。审视所有这些进展,新出现的问题是:从患者治疗效果改善以及经济角度的成本效益比来看,所有这些进展是否都合理?本文的目的是批判性地分析理论上提出的“髋关节置换术进展”的优点和缺点,并试图从国际和欧洲的角度,结合作者个人的临床经验,理解如今哪些“进展”是合理的。引用本文:2017;2。DOI:10.1302/2058 - 5241.2.170008。最初在线发表于www.efortopenreviews.org。