Cordemans Virginie, Kaminski Ludovic, Banse Xavier, Francq Bernard G, Detrembleur Christine, Cartiaux Olivier
Neuro Musculo Skeletal Lab (NMSK), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain-la-Neuve, UCL/IREC/CARS, Avenue Mounier 53, Box B1.53.07, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Service d'orthopédie et de traumatologie de l'appareil locomoteur, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Eur Spine J. 2017 Nov;26(11):2917-2926. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5195-3. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
The goals of this study were to assess the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion using an intraoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) system, and to analyze the factors potentially influencing this accuracy.
Six hundred and ninety-five pedicle screws were inserted in 118 patients between October 2013 and March 2016. Screw insertion was performed using 2D-fluoroscopy or CBCT-based navigation. Accuracy was assessed in terms of breach and reposition. All the intraoperative CBCT scans, done after screw insertion, were reviewed to assess the accuracy of screw placement using two established classification systems: Gertzbein and Heary. Generalized linear mixed models were used to model the odds (95% CI) for a screw to lead to a breach according to the independent variables.
The breach rate was 11.7% using the Gertzbein classification and 15.4% using the Heary classification. Seventeen screws (2.4%) were repositioned intraoperatively. The only factor affecting statistically the odds to have a breach was the indication of surgery. The patients with non-degenerative disease had a significantly higher risk of breach than those with degenerative disease.
Use of intraoperative CBCT as 2D-fluoroscopy or coupled with a navigation system for pedicle screw insertion is accurate in terms of breach occurrence and reposition. However, these rates depend on the classification or grading system used. Use of a navigation system does not decrease the risk of breach significantly. And the risk of breach is higher in non-degenerative conditions (trauma, scoliosis, infection, and malignancy disease) than in degenerative diseases.
本研究的目的是评估术中使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)系统进行椎弓根螺钉植入的准确性,并分析可能影响该准确性的因素。
2013年10月至2016年3月期间,对118例患者植入了695枚椎弓根螺钉。使用二维荧光透视或基于CBCT的导航进行螺钉植入。从突破和重新定位方面评估准确性。对所有螺钉植入后进行的术中CBCT扫描进行回顾,使用两种既定的分类系统(Gertzbein和Heary)评估螺钉置入的准确性。使用广义线性混合模型根据自变量对螺钉导致突破的几率(95%可信区间)进行建模。
使用Gertzbein分类时突破率为11.7%,使用Heary分类时为15.4%。17枚螺钉(2.4%)在术中重新定位。唯一在统计学上影响突破几率的因素是手术指征。非退行性疾病患者的突破风险显著高于退行性疾病患者。
术中使用CBCT作为二维荧光透视或与导航系统结合进行椎弓根螺钉植入,在突破发生和重新定位方面是准确的。然而,这些比率取决于所使用的分类或分级系统。使用导航系统并不能显著降低突破风险。非退行性疾病(创伤、脊柱侧弯、感染和恶性疾病)中的突破风险高于退行性疾病。