• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管紧张素系统抑制剂对接受化疗和/或贝伐单抗治疗的新诊断脑胶质瘤患者和复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者生存的影响。

Effect of angiotensin system inhibitors on survival in newly diagnosed glioma patients and recurrent glioblastoma patients receiving chemotherapy and/or bevacizumab.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery and Neurosciences, Kaiser Permanente, Redwood City, CA, USA.

The Universiy of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Neurooncol. 2017 Sep;134(2):325-330. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2528-3. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1007/s11060-017-2528-3
PMID:28631191
Abstract

Given prior studies that suggest the use of angiotensin system inhibitors (ASIs) is associated with prolonged overall survival (OS) in glioblastoma (GBM) patients, we evaluated the effect of ASIs in glioma patients receiving chemotherapy and/or bevacizumab (BEV). Using retrospective IRB-approved electronic chart review of newly diagnosed WHO grade 2-4 glioma patients from the Kaiser Permanente Tumor Registry of Northern California, we evaluated the impact of ASIs on OS by Cox proportional hazard model analysis for subgroups who received cytotoxic therapy, cytotoxic therapy with BEV, or BEV alone, as well as those with recurrent GBM (rGBM). Of the 1186 glioma patients who received chemotherapy ASI exposure improved OS (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.71, 0.93; p = 0.003). When stratified by BEV exposure, a sub-analysis revealed further OS advantage for the BEV group (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62, 0.90; p = 0.002). In a second cohort of 181 rGBM patients who received BEV in varying dosages, ASI exposure conferred an OS advantage (HR 0.649; 95% CI 0.46, 0.92; p = 0.016). Moreover, patients with ASI exposure who received low-dose BEV treatment (AUC < 3.6 mg wk/kg) had a significantly longer OS (median = 99 weeks; 95% CI 44.3, 205) than those without ASI (median OS = 55.6 weeks; 95% CI 37.7-73.7; p = 0.032). ASI use is associated with longer OS in glioma patients. Further survival advantage with ASI use was observed in rGBM patients receiving low-dose bevacizumab. These data warrant prospective evaluation of adding ASI to low-dose BEV treatment in GBM patients to improve the outcome of standard therapies.

摘要

鉴于先前的研究表明,血管紧张素系统抑制剂(ASIs)的使用与胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)患者的总生存期(OS)延长有关,我们评估了 ASIs 在接受化疗和/或贝伐单抗(BEV)治疗的胶质瘤患者中的作用。我们使用北加利福尼亚 Kaiser Permanente 肿瘤登记处的新诊断为世界卫生组织 2-4 级胶质瘤患者的回顾性 IRB 批准的电子图表审查,通过 Cox 比例风险模型分析评估了 ASIs 对 OS 的影响,亚组患者接受细胞毒性治疗、细胞毒性治疗联合 BEV 或仅接受 BEV 治疗,以及那些患有复发性 GBM(rGBM)的患者。在接受化疗的 1186 名胶质瘤患者中,ASIs 暴露改善了 OS(HR 0.82;95%CI 0.71,0.93;p=0.003)。当按 BEV 暴露分层时,亚分析显示 BEV 组有进一步的 OS 优势(HR 0.75,95%CI 0.62,0.90;p=0.002)。在接受不同剂量 BEV 治疗的 181 名 rGBM 患者的第二个队列中,ASIs 暴露带来了 OS 优势(HR 0.649;95%CI 0.46,0.92;p=0.016)。此外,接受低剂量 BEV 治疗(AUC<3.6 mg·wk/kg)且有 ASI 暴露的患者的 OS 明显更长(中位 OS=99 周;95%CI 44.3,205),而没有 ASI 的患者的中位 OS 较短(中位 OS=55.6 周;95%CI 37.7-73.7;p=0.032)。ASIs 的使用与胶质瘤患者的 OS 延长有关。在接受低剂量贝伐单抗治疗的 rGBM 患者中,ASIs 的使用观察到了进一步的生存优势。这些数据需要前瞻性评估在 GBM 患者中添加 ASIs 以提高标准治疗的疗效。

相似文献

1
Effect of angiotensin system inhibitors on survival in newly diagnosed glioma patients and recurrent glioblastoma patients receiving chemotherapy and/or bevacizumab.血管紧张素系统抑制剂对接受化疗和/或贝伐单抗治疗的新诊断脑胶质瘤患者和复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者生存的影响。
J Neurooncol. 2017 Sep;134(2):325-330. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2528-3. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
2
Impact of bevacizumab administered dose on overall survival of patients with progressive glioblastoma.贝伐单抗给药剂量对进展性胶质母细胞瘤患者总生存期的影响。
J Neurooncol. 2015 Mar;122(1):145-50. doi: 10.1007/s11060-014-1693-x. Epub 2015 Jan 11.
3
Bevacizumab and re-irradiation for recurrent high grade gliomas: does sequence matter?贝伐单抗联合再放疗治疗复发性高级别胶质瘤:顺序重要吗?
J Neurooncol. 2018 Dec;140(3):623-628. doi: 10.1007/s11060-018-2989-z. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
4
Toxicity and efficacy of lomustine and bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma patients.洛莫司汀和贝伐珠单抗治疗复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者的毒性和疗效。
J Neurooncol. 2018 Apr;137(2):439-446. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2736-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
5
Evidence for improved survival with bevacizumab treatment in recurrent high-grade gliomas: a retrospective study with ("pseudo-randomized") treatment allocation by the health insurance provider.贝伐珠单抗治疗复发性高级别胶质瘤患者的生存获益证据:一项回顾性研究,按照医疗保险提供方的治疗分配进行(“伪随机化”)。
J Neurooncol. 2020 Jun;148(2):373-379. doi: 10.1007/s11060-020-03533-5. Epub 2020 May 14.
6
A Randomized Phase II Trial (TAMIGA) Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Bevacizumab Through Multiple Lines of Treatment for Recurrent Glioblastoma.一项评估贝伐珠单抗连续用药治疗复发性胶质母细胞瘤的疗效和安全性的随机 II 期临床试验(TAMIGA)。
Oncologist. 2019 Apr;24(4):521-528. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0290. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
7
Phase II Study of Bevacizumab and Vorinostat for Patients with Recurrent World Health Organization Grade 4 Malignant Glioma.贝伐珠单抗联合伏立诺他治疗复发性世界卫生组织分级 4 级恶性脑胶质瘤的 II 期研究。
Oncologist. 2018 Feb;23(2):157-e21. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0501. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
8
Dexamethasone administration during definitive radiation and temozolomide renders a poor prognosis in a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients.在一项针对新诊断胶质母细胞瘤患者的回顾性分析中,在确定性放疗和替莫唑胺治疗期间给予地塞米松预后较差。
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Oct 31;10:222. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0527-0.
9
Salvage re-irradiation for recurrent high-grade glioma and comparison to bevacizumab alone.挽救性再放疗治疗复发性高级别胶质瘤,并与贝伐珠单抗单药治疗进行比较。
J Neurooncol. 2017 Dec;135(3):581-591. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2611-9. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
10
Progression-free and overall survival in patients with recurrent Glioblastoma multiforme treated with last-line bevacizumab versus bevacizumab/lomustine.接受一线贝伐单抗与贝伐单抗/洛莫司汀治疗的复发性多形性胶质母细胞瘤患者的无进展生存期和总生存期
J Neurooncol. 2016 Feb;126(3):567-75. doi: 10.1007/s11060-015-2002-z. Epub 2015 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The application of telmisartan in central nervous system disorders.替米沙坦在中枢神经系统疾病中的应用。
Pharmacol Rep. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1007/s43440-025-00737-2.
2
Chronic compression drives macrophages toward a pathological pro-tumor state.慢性压迫促使巨噬细胞走向病理性促肿瘤状态。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 17:2025.05.13.653793. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.13.653793.
3
Targeting the tumour vasculature: from vessel destruction to promotion.靶向肿瘤血管:从血管破坏到促进。

本文引用的文献

1
Magnetic resonance perfusion image features uncover an angiogenic subgroup of glioblastoma patients with poor survival and better response to antiangiogenic treatment.磁共振灌注成像特征揭示出胶质母细胞瘤患者中存在一个血管生成亚组,这些患者的生存预后较差,但对抗血管生成治疗的反应更好。
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;19(7):997-1007. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now270.
2
Effect of Angiotensin System Inhibitors on Survival in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.血管紧张素系统抑制剂对晚期非小细胞肺癌化疗患者生存率的影响。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2017 Mar;18(2):189-197.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.07.008. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
3
Nat Rev Cancer. 2024 Oct;24(10):655-675. doi: 10.1038/s41568-024-00736-0. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
4
Metformin synergizes with PD-1 blockade to promote normalization of tumor vessels via CD8T cells and IFNγ.二甲双胍与 PD-1 阻断协同作用,通过 CD8T 细胞和 IFNγ 促进肿瘤血管正常化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jul 23;121(30):e2404778121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2404778121. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
5
Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future.胶质母细胞瘤治疗:过去、现在和未来。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Feb 21;25(5):2529. doi: 10.3390/ijms25052529.
6
Alleviating hypoxia to improve cancer immunotherapy.缓解缺氧以改善癌症免疫疗法。
Oncogene. 2023 Dec;42(49):3591-3604. doi: 10.1038/s41388-023-02869-2. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
7
Reprogramming the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment: exploiting angiogenesis and thrombosis to enhance immunotherapy.重新编程免疫抑制性肿瘤微环境:利用血管生成和血栓形成增强免疫治疗。
Front Immunol. 2023 Jul 3;14:1200941. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1200941. eCollection 2023.
8
Effect of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors on survival outcomes in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂对免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的癌症患者生存结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Immunol. 2023 Apr 19;14:1155104. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1155104. eCollection 2023.
9
The strange Microenvironment of Glioblastoma.脑胶质瘤的奇异微环境。
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2023 Jun;179(5):490-501. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2023.03.007. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
10
Tumor Microenvironment in Gliomas: A Treatment Hurdle or an Opportunity to Grab?胶质瘤中的肿瘤微环境:治疗障碍还是可把握的机遇?
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 7;15(4):1042. doi: 10.3390/cancers15041042.
Novel insights into vascularization patterns and angiogenic factors in glioblastoma subclasses.
胶质母细胞瘤亚类中血管生成模式和血管生成因子的新见解。
J Neurooncol. 2017 Jan;131(1):11-20. doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2269-8. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
4
Impact of Angiotensin-II receptor blockers on vasogenic edema in glioblastoma patients.血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂对胶质母细胞瘤患者血管源性水肿的影响。
J Neurol. 2016 Mar;263(3):524-30. doi: 10.1007/s00415-015-8016-9. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
5
Impact of renin-angiotensin system blockade on clinical outcome in glioblastoma.肾素-血管紧张素系统阻断对胶质母细胞瘤临床结局的影响。
Eur J Neurol. 2015 Sep;22(9):1304-9. doi: 10.1111/ene.12746. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
6
Angiotensin receptor blockers improve survival outcomes after radiofrequency ablation in hepatocarcinoma patients.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂可改善肝癌患者射频消融术后的生存结局。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Nov;30(11):1643-50. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12988.
7
Angiotensin system inhibitors and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.血管紧张素系统抑制剂与转移性肾细胞癌患者的生存结局
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Jun 1;21(11):2471-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2332. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
8
Lessons from anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor trials in patients with glioblastoma.胶质母细胞瘤患者抗血管内皮生长因子及抗血管内皮生长因子受体试验的经验教训。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr 1;33(10):1197-213. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.9575. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
9
Impact of bevacizumab administered dose on overall survival of patients with progressive glioblastoma.贝伐单抗给药剂量对进展性胶质母细胞瘤患者总生存期的影响。
J Neurooncol. 2015 Mar;122(1):145-50. doi: 10.1007/s11060-014-1693-x. Epub 2015 Jan 11.
10
Antiangiogenesis strategies revisited: from starving tumors to alleviating hypoxia.抗血管生成策略再探讨:从饿死肿瘤到缓解缺氧
Cancer Cell. 2014 Nov 10;26(5):605-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2014.10.006.