• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年住院患者的处方开具:对转诊至老年专科会诊的患者的回顾性分析。

Prescribing in the oldest old inpatients: a retrospective analysis of patients referred for specialist geriatric consultation.

作者信息

Ilango Sivarajah, Pillans Peter, Peel Nancye M, Scott Ian, Gray Leonard C, Hubbard Ruth E

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Department of Internal Medicine, The Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Intern Med J. 2017 Sep;47(9):1019-1025. doi: 10.1111/imj.13526.

DOI:10.1111/imj.13526
PMID:28632340
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While medications may prolong life and prevent morbidity in older people, adverse effects of polypharmacy are increasingly recognised. As patients age and become frail, prescribing may be expected to focus more on symptom control and minimise potentially harmful preventive medication use that confer little benefit within a short lifespan. Whether prescribing practice shifts to one of symptom controls among the oldest old admitted to hospital remains unclear.

AIM

To determine, in the oldest old inpatients, whether preventive versus symptom control medication prescribing was associated with age or level of frailty.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all patients aged ≥85 years referred for comprehensive geriatric assessment at a tertiary care hospital between May 2006 and December 2014 for whom all prescribed medications were documented. Medication use was assessed according to age group (85-89, 90-94, ≥95) and categories of frailty index calculated for patients based on 52 deficits (fitter, moderately frail, frail and severely frail).

RESULTS

Seven hundred and eighty-three inpatients were assessed of mean (SD) age 89.0 (3.4) and mean frailty index 0.45 (SD 0.14) with a median of eight co-morbidities (IQR 6-10) and who were prescribed a mean of 8.3 (SD 3.8) regular medications per day. Polypharmacy (5-9 medications per day) was observed in 406 patients (51.9%) and hyper-polypharmacy (≥10 medications per day) in 268 patients (34.2%). While there was a significant decrease in number of prescribed medications as age increased, there were no differences across age groups or frailty categories in proportions of medications used for prevention versus symptom control.

CONCLUSION

Polypharmacy is prevalent in oldest old inpatients and prescribing patterns according to prevention versus symptom control appear unaffected by age and frailty status.

摘要

背景

虽然药物可以延长老年人的寿命并预防疾病,但多重用药的不良反应越来越受到关注。随着患者年龄增长且身体变得虚弱,处方可能更应侧重于症状控制,并尽量减少在短寿命内益处不大的潜在有害预防性药物的使用。对于入住医院的高龄老人,处方实践是否转向症状控制之一仍不清楚。

目的

确定在高龄住院患者中,预防性用药与症状控制用药的处方是否与年龄或虚弱程度相关。

方法

对2006年5月至2014年12月在一家三级护理医院接受综合老年评估的所有年龄≥85岁的患者进行回顾性分析,这些患者的所有处方药物均有记录。根据年龄组(85 - 89岁、90 - 94岁、≥95岁)以及基于52项缺陷为患者计算的虚弱指数类别(身体状况较好、中度虚弱、虚弱和重度虚弱)评估药物使用情况。

结果

评估了783名住院患者,平均(标准差)年龄为89.0(3.4)岁,平均虚弱指数为0.45(标准差0.14),中位数为8种合并症(四分位间距6 - 10),每天平均开具8.3(标准差3.8)种常规药物。406名患者(51.9%)存在多重用药(每天5 - 9种药物),268名患者(34.2%)存在超多重用药(每天≥10种药物)。虽然随着年龄增加,处方药物数量显著减少,但在预防用药与症状控制用药比例方面,各年龄组或虚弱类别之间没有差异。

结论

多重用药在高龄住院患者中普遍存在,根据预防与症状控制的处方模式似乎不受年龄和虚弱状态影响。

相似文献

1
Prescribing in the oldest old inpatients: a retrospective analysis of patients referred for specialist geriatric consultation.老年住院患者的处方开具:对转诊至老年专科会诊的患者的回顾性分析。
Intern Med J. 2017 Sep;47(9):1019-1025. doi: 10.1111/imj.13526.
2
Adverse Outcomes in Relation to Polypharmacy in Robust and Frail Older Hospital Patients.强健和虚弱老年住院患者多重用药相关的不良结局
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Aug 1;17(8):767.e9-767.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.05.017. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
3
Geriatrician interventions on medication prescribing for frail older people in residential aged care facilities.老年医学专家对居住式老年护理机构中体弱老年人用药处方的干预措施。
Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Jun 25;10:1043-51. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S84402. eCollection 2015.
4
Medication prescribing in frail older people.老年人虚弱者的药物处方。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Mar;69(3):319-26. doi: 10.1007/s00228-012-1387-2. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
5
Deprescribing in multi-morbid older people with polypharmacy: agreement between STOPPFrail explicit criteria and gold standard deprescribing using 100 standardized clinical cases.多病共存且用药过多的老年患者的撤药治疗:STOPPFrail明确标准与使用100个标准化临床病例的撤药治疗金标准之间的一致性
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Mar;75(3):427-432. doi: 10.1007/s00228-018-2598-y. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
6
Underuse of medications for chronic diseases in the oldest of community-dwelling older frail Japanese.社区居住的高龄体弱日本老人中慢性病药物的使用不足情况
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Apr;54(4):598-605. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00659.x.
7
Prescribing for older people discharged from the acute sector to residential aged-care facilities.为从急症科出院后入住老年护理机构的老年人开药方。
Intern Med J. 2014 Oct;44(10):1034-7. doi: 10.1111/imj.12553.
8
Family conferences and shared prioritisation to improve patient safety in the frail elderly (COFRAIL): study protocol of a cluster randomised intervention trial in primary care.家庭会议和共同优先级排序以改善虚弱老年人的患者安全(COFRAIL):初级保健中群组随机干预试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Mar 20;21(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4182-x.
9
The potential clinical benefits of medicines optimisation through comprehensive geriatric assessment, carried out by secondary care geriatricians, in a general practice care setting in North Staffordshire, UK: a feasibility study.通过在英国北斯塔福德郡的一般实践护理环境中由二级护理老年病学家进行全面老年评估来优化药物治疗的潜在临床获益:一项可行性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 28;7(9):e015278. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015278.
10
Multiple medication use in older patients in post-acute transitional care: a prospective cohort study.老年患者在急性后过渡护理中的多重用药:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Sep 2;9:1453-62. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S64105. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterising polypharmacy in the very old: Findings from the Newcastle 85+ Study.描述非常高龄老年人的多重用药情况:纽卡斯尔 85+ 研究的结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 19;16(1):e0245648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245648. eCollection 2021.