Degenhardt Brian F, Johnson Jane C, Fossum Christian, Andicochea Chad T, Stuart Melissa K
*A.T. Still Research Institute, A.T. Still University, Kirksville, MO †Naval Strike and Warfare Center, Fallon, NV ‡Department of Microbiology/Immunology, A.T. Still University-Kirksville College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kirksville, MO.
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Jul;30(6):E690-E701. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000231.
Unbalanced 3-factor design with repeated measures on 1 factor.
To determine the effect of manual treatment (MT) on cytokine and pain sensations in those with and without low back pain (LBP).
Evidence suggests that MT reduces LBP but by unknown mechanisms. Certain cytokines have been elevated in patients with LBP and may be affected by MT.
Participants aged 20-60 years with chronic LBP or without LBP were recruited and randomly assigned to MT, sham ultrasound treatment, or no treatment groups. Venous blood samples were collected and pain levels assessed at baseline, 1 hour later, and 24 hours later. Blood was analyzed for interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and C-reactive protein. Pain levels were measured by pressure pain threshold (PPT), mechanical detection threshold (MDT), dynamic mechanical allodynia, and self-report.
Forty (30 women, age 36±11 y) participants completed the study, 33 with LBP (13 MT, 13 sham ultrasound treatment, and 7 no treatment) and 7 without LBP. Participants with or without LBP could not be differentiated on the basis of serum cytokine levels, PPT, or MDT (P≥0.08). There were no significant differences between the groups at 1 hour or 24 hours on serum cytokines, PPT, or MDT (P≥0.07). There was a significant decrease from baseline in IL-6 for the no treatment (LBP) group (P=0.04), in C-reactive protein for the sham ultrasound treatment group (P=0.03), in MDT for all 3 LBP groups (P≤0.02), and in self-reported pain for the MT and sham ultrasound treatment groups (P=0.03 and 0.01).
Self-reported pain was reduced with MT and sham ultrasound treatment 24 hours after treatment, but inflammatory markers within venous circulation and quantitative sensory tests were unable to differentiate between study groups. Therefore, we were unable to characterize mechanisms underlying chronic LBP.
不平衡三因素设计,对一个因素进行重复测量。
确定手法治疗(MT)对有和无下腰痛(LBP)患者细胞因子和疼痛感觉的影响。
有证据表明MT可减轻LBP,但作用机制不明。某些细胞因子在LBP患者中升高,可能受MT影响。
招募年龄在20 - 60岁的慢性LBP患者或无LBP患者,并随机分为MT组、假超声治疗组或不治疗组。在基线、1小时后和24小时后采集静脉血样本并评估疼痛程度。分析血液中的白细胞介素(IL)-1β、IL-6、肿瘤坏死因子-α和C反应蛋白。通过压力疼痛阈值(PPT)、机械检测阈值(MDT)、动态机械性痛觉过敏和自我报告来测量疼痛程度。
40名(30名女性,年龄36±11岁)参与者完成了研究,33名有LBP(13名接受MT,13名接受假超声治疗,7名不治疗),7名无LBP。有或无LBP的参与者在血清细胞因子水平、PPT或MDT方面无法区分(P≥0.08)。在1小时或24小时时,各组在血清细胞因子、PPT或MDT方面无显著差异(P≥0.07)。不治疗(LBP)组的IL-6较基线有显著下降(P = 0.04),假超声治疗组的C反应蛋白较基线有显著下降(P = 0.03),所有3个LBP组的MDT较基线有显著下降(P≤0.02),MT组和假超声治疗组的自我报告疼痛较基线有显著下降(P = 0.03和0.01)。
治疗24小时后,MT和假超声治疗均使自我报告的疼痛减轻,但静脉循环中的炎症标志物和定量感觉测试无法区分研究组。因此,我们无法确定慢性LBP的潜在机制。