O'Keefe D, Stoové M, Doyle J, Dietze P, Hellard M
Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
J Viral Hepat. 2017 Sep;24(9):714-724. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12741. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
Inadequate response to injecting drug use (IDU) is a significant problem the world over. Low levels of funding, political inaction, poor levels of health service coverage, high prevalence and incidence of IDU-related blood-borne viruses (BBVs) and ongoing stigmatization/marginalization affect people who inject drugs (PWID) regardless of the income status of the country they reside in. These barriers and system failings are, however, exacerbated in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), meaning that the potential consequences of inaction are more pressing. In this narrative review, we describe the levels of IDU and IDU-specific BBV prevalence in LMICs; levels of harm reduction implementation; the consequences of late or insufficient response, the shortcomings of data collection and dissemination; and the barriers to effective LMIC harm reduction implementation. We also exemplify cases where IDU-related harms and BBV epidemics have been successfully curtailed in LMICs, showing that effective response, despite the barriers, is possible. In conclusion, we suggest four key priorities on the basis of the review: confirming the presence or absence of IDU in LMICs, improving the collection and dissemination of national IDU-specific data, increasing the level of harm reduction programme implementation in LMICs, and increasing both national and international advocacy for PWID and attendant public health interventions.
对注射吸毒问题应对不力是全球一个重大问题。资金水平低、政治上不作为、卫生服务覆盖水平差、与注射吸毒相关的血源性病毒(BBV)的高流行率和发病率以及持续存在的污名化/边缘化现象,影响着注射吸毒者(PWID),无论他们所在国家的收入状况如何。然而,这些障碍和系统缺陷在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)中更为严重,这意味着不作为的潜在后果更为紧迫。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们描述了低收入和中等收入国家注射吸毒的水平以及特定于注射吸毒的血源性病毒流行率;减少伤害措施的实施水平;应对迟缓或不足的后果、数据收集和传播的缺点;以及低收入和中等收入国家有效实施减少伤害措施的障碍。我们还举例说明了在低收入和中等收入国家成功遏制与注射吸毒相关的危害和血源性病毒流行的案例,表明尽管存在障碍,但有效应对是可能的。总之,我们在综述的基础上提出了四个关键优先事项:确认低收入和中等收入国家是否存在注射吸毒现象,改善国家特定于注射吸毒的数据的收集和传播,提高低收入和中等收入国家减少伤害方案的实施水平,以及加强国家和国际上对注射吸毒者及相关公共卫生干预措施的宣传。