Shanmuga Doss Sreeja, Bhatt Nirav Pravinbhai, Jayaraman Guhan
Department of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of Biosciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India.
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India.
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2017 Aug 15;1060:255-261. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
There is an unreasonably high variation in the literature reports on molecular weight of hyaluronic acid (HA) estimated using conventional size exclusion chromatography (SEC). This variation is most likely due to errors in estimation. Working with commercially available HA molecular weight standards, this work examines the extent of error in molecular weight estimation due to two factors: use of non-HA based calibration and concentration of sample injected into the SEC column. We develop a multivariate regression correlation to correct for concentration effect. Our analysis showed that, SEC calibration based on non-HA standards like polyethylene oxide and pullulan led to approximately 2 and 10 times overestimation, respectively, when compared to HA-based calibration. Further, we found that injected sample concentration has an effect on molecular weight estimation. Even at 1g/l injected sample concentration, HA molecular weight standards of 0.7 and 1.64MDa showed appreciable underestimation of 11-24%. The multivariate correlation developed was found to reduce error in estimations at 1g/l to <4%. The correlation was also successfully applied to accurately estimate the molecular weight of HA produced by a recombinant Lactococcus lactis fermentation.
在使用传统尺寸排阻色谱法(SEC)估算透明质酸(HA)分子量的文献报道中,存在不合理的高度差异。这种差异很可能是由于估算误差所致。本研究使用市售的HA分子量标准品,考察了由于两个因素导致的分子量估算误差程度:使用非HA基校准以及注入SEC柱的样品浓度。我们建立了多元回归相关性以校正浓度效应。我们的分析表明,与基于HA的校准相比,基于聚环氧乙烷和支链淀粉等非HA标准品的SEC校准分别导致高估约2倍和10倍。此外,我们发现注入样品浓度对分子量估算有影响。即使在注入样品浓度为1g/l时,0.7和1.64MDa的HA分子量标准品也显示出11-24%的明显低估。发现所建立的多元相关性可将1g/l时的估算误差降低至<4%。该相关性还成功应用于准确估算重组乳酸乳球菌发酵产生的HA的分子量。